Richmond Times-Dispatch
Email Facebook Twitter YouTube Mobile RSS
|
 
RTD Virginia Politics

Capitol Briefs: Ignition lock advances for drunken drivers

Ignition interlock

Credit: BOB BROWN/TIMES-DISPATCH

Jack Dalton of LifeSafer demonstrated an an ignition interlock device for legislators last week.


»  Comments | Post a Comment

What's happening today?

The House of Delegates takes up a bill that would require a woman to have an ultrasound before having an abortion.

Curb on GPS tracking fails in Senate panel

Legislation that would have prohibited the use of GPS devices to track people without their knowledge failed in a Senate committee Monday.

House Bill 807, sponsored by Del. Joe T. May, R-Loudoun, was defeated 9-6 on the Republican-controlled Courts of Justice Committee on a bipartisan vote. The vote effectively kills the legislation for the year.

The measure was a recommendation of the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and was inspired by a constituent who learned that a private detective hired by his spouse could legally place a tracking device on his car without his knowledge.

May's bill provided numerous exemptions for law enforcement, parents, caregivers and owners of fleet vehicles.

Ignition lock advances for drunken drivers

Legislation that calls for the installation of an ignition interlock device for a first offense of drunken driving cleared the Senate Courts of Justice Committee on a bipartisan 9-6 vote.

Currently ignition interlocks — which prevent cars from starting if the driver is under the influence — are installed on second or subsequent offenses of DUI, or on a first offense if a driver's blood alcohol content is 0.15 percent or greater.

The Senate recently passed an interlock bill that requires the devices to be installed when drivers are convicted of exceeding the legal limit of 0.08 percent.

House Bill 279, sponsored by Del. Salvatore R. Iaquinto, R-Virginia Beach, had a similar provision but was amended by the panel to set a new threshold of 0.12 percent.

The measure now heads to the full Senate for consideration.

Was that a ringing endorsement of bill?

An unknown state delegate may have committed a Class 3 misdemeanor Monday when he caused his phone to ring (multiple times) with intent to annoy Del. Robert Tata, R-Virginia Beach.

When the offense occurred, Tata was in the process of explaining his House Bill 39. The bill would make it a Class 2 misdemeanor — punishable by up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine — for a second or subsequent offense of causing a phone or pager to "ring with intent to annoy."

Currently, a person guilty of such a crime faces a Class 3 misdemeanor, which carries a fine of up to $500, no matter how many times the offender has been convicted.

Terms and Conditions

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 
 

Advertisement

Reader Comments

*Facebook Account Required to Comment. If you are not already logged into Facebook, please click the comment button to do so.

Deal of the Day

Advertisement

VCU Rams' Gear

VCU Rams' Gear 300px

Get all your Rams' gear right here.

Advertisement

Daily Email Newsletter

daily update 2

Get the morning's top headlines delivered directly to your inbox every morning. Sign up now!

 
 

Most Popular

Purchase RTD Photos

Columbus' ships sail into Richmond
Columbus' ships sail into Richmond
Close Title
 

Advertisement

Media General
KewlBoxBoxerJam: Games & Puzzles
Games, Puzzles & Trivia
Blockdot: Advergaming and Branded Media
Advergaming and Branded Media

MyYahoo!