Geithner says some bailout funds to help lower deficit
Published: November 19, 2009
Updated: November 19, 2009
WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Thursday the government’s $700 billion bailout program will end “as soon as we can,“ and that part of it will be used to lower the record deficit.
During a Joint Economic Committee hearing, Geithner was pressed to disclose the administration’s plan for dealing with the unpopular financial rescue program. He did not say how much of the bailout would go toward paying down the deficit, which hit an all-time high of $1.42 trillion for the budget year that ended Sept. 30 and is expected to rise even higher this year.
“We are winding it down and will close it as soon as we can,“ he said.
Geithner was on Capitol Hill pushing Congress to move quickly in overhauling the nation’s badly flawed financial rules, which he says is essential for the health of the economy.
Both the House and Senate are making progress toward revamping the current regulations, but Geithner said a rapid conclusion is needed to keep the economic recovery on track.
“To ensure the vitality, the strength and the stability of our economy going forward, we must bring our system of financial regulation into the 21st century,“ Geithner testified.
The House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Banking Committee are working on their own versions of sweeping overhaul plans, but the two panels are taking sharply divergent approaches in some areas.
Both proposals also face sharp opposition from major sectors in the financial industry, casting doubt on how quickly Congress will be able to reach agreement and send a finished bill to the White House.
Geithner said the administration wants to ensure that firms not be able to escape or avoid oversight by shopping for the most lenient regulator, a situation critics say contributed to the worst financial market crisis in seven decades.
“The fact that investment banks like Bear Stearns or Lehman Brothers or other large firms like AIG could escape meaningful consolidated federal supervision simply by virtue of their legal form should be considered unthinkable from now on,“ Geithner said.
Another item the administration wants to see approved by Congress is to make sure the financial system as a whole is more capable of absorbing shocks and coping with failures. Geithner said this will require putting a greater focus on the quality of capital that firms are allowed to hold.
Capital reserves are the cushion financial firms carry to absorb loses.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
If I have a mortgage loan of $200,000 at 5% and pay it off with another loan at 7.5% how is that reducing my personal deficit?
By putting the 2nd loan in an SPV and keeping it off of the balance sheet. If it works for Citigroup….
Really?,
The other problem is that the gov had to pay interest on this money, but as far as I know the institutions paying it back don’t.
Two points: The government borrowed the money at extremely low rates - think a half of 1 percent. And every swinging financial institution is paying interest, and that interest rate increases the longer they hold on to the loan.
If I have a mortgage loan of $200,000 at 5% and pay it off with another loan at 7.5% how is that reducing my personal deficit?
It’s quite simple really and has always been there for people to understand if they aren’t out there fearmongering.
The 700B bailout for financial institutions (passed under Bush) was intended to be loans to help them through a tough time, albiet of their own making. As those monies get paid back, see story on Union Bankshares as an example, it would either get doled out to other institutions or as the program gets ramped down go back to the gov, which could then be used to pay down the debt created by borrowing the 700B in the first place.
Will the whole 700B get paid back. No, some of the businesses ended up going under anyways, so that portion of the money is gone, but I am guessing much of eventually will get paid back. How much? We will just have to wait and see.
The other problem is that the gov had to pay interest on this money, but as far as I know the institutions paying it back don’t. So, there goes some money there. Whatever is left over is supposed to go back to paying off US debt.
The $700B was “expensed” as part of the National Debt - so of the $1.42T deficit, some was used to loan out to help various entities survive and continue operations. As it is repaid it could either be re-used or put back against the deficit—I think we all want to see it put back against the deficit!
At the risk of sounding ignorant, just exactly how do you reduce a deficit with borrowed money? Wouldn’t it be wiser to not get into further debt?
I’m reminded of 19th century ‘snake-oil’ salesmen. Whatever they were selling would cure EVERYTHING. Uh - the stimulus money is a loan. If we use it to pay off the debt, doesn’t that mean we will have to take out another loan to pay off the first loan - at higher interest?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement