MOUNTAIN OF DEBT: Rising debt may be next crisis

MOUNTAIN OF DEBT: Rising debt may be next crisis

(AP Photo/Yanina Manolova) 

The soaring national debt is recorded on the National Debt Clock in New York, Friday, July 3, 2009.

» 7 Comments | Post a Comment

WASHINGTON (AP)—The Founding Fathers left one legacy not celebrated on Independence Day but which affects us all. It’s the national debt.

The country first got into debt to help pay for the Revolutionary War. Growing ever since, the debt stands today at a staggering $11.4 trillion - equivalent to about $37,000 for each and every American. And it’s expanding by over $1 trillion a year.

The mountain of debt easily could become the next full-fledged economic crisis without firm action from Washington, economists of all stripes warn.

“Unless we demonstrate a strong commitment to fiscal sustainability in the longer term, we will have neither financial stability nor healthy economic growth,“ Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke recently told Congress.

Higher taxes, or reduced federal benefits and services - or a combination of both - may be the inevitable consequences.

The debt is complicating efforts by President Barack Obama and Congress to cope with the worst recession in decades as stimulus and bailout spending combine with lower tax revenues to widen the gap.

Interest payments on the debt alone cost $452 billion last year - the largest federal spending category after Medicare-Medicaid, Social Security and defense. It’s quickly crowding out all other government spending. And the Treasury is finding it harder to find new lenders.

The United States went into the red the first time in 1790 when it assumed $75 million in the war debts of the Continental Congress.

Alexander Hamilton, the first treasury secretary, said, “A national debt, if not excessive, will be to us a national blessing.“

Some blessing.

Since then, the nation has only been free of debt once, in 1834-1835.

The national debt has expanded during times of war and usually contracted in times of peace, while staying on a generally upward trajectory. Over the past several decades, it has climbed sharply - except for a respite from 1998 to 2000, when there were annual budget surpluses, reflecting in large part what turned out to be an overheated economy.

The debt soared with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and economic stimulus spending under President George W. Bush and now Obama.

The odometer-style “debt clock” near Times Square - put in place in 1989 when the debt was a mere $2.7 trillion - ran out of numbers and had to be shut down when the debt surged past $10 trillion in 2008.

The clock has since been refurbished so higher numbers fit. There are several debt clocks on Web sites maintained by public interest groups that let you watch hundreds, thousands, millions zip by in a matter of seconds.

The debt gap is “something that keeps me awake at night,“ Obama says.

He pledged to cut the budget “deficit” roughly in half by the end of his first term. But “deficit” just means the difference between government receipts and spending in a single budget year.

This year’s deficit is now estimated at about $1.85 trillion.

Deficits don’t reflect holdover indebtedness from previous years. Some spending items - such as emergency appropriations bills and receipts in the Social Security program - aren’t included, either, although they are part of the national debt.

The national debt is a broader, and more telling, way to look at the government’s balance sheets than glancing at deficits.

According to the Treasury Department, which updates the number “to the penny” every few days, the national debt was $11,518,472,742,288 on Wednesday.

The overall debt is now slightly over 80 percent of the annual output of the entire U.S. economy, as measured by the gross domestic product.

By historical standards, it’s not proportionately as high as during World War II, when it briefly rose to 120 percent of GDP. But it’s still a huge liability.

Also, the United States is not the only nation struggling under a huge national debt. Among major countries, Japan, Italy, India, France, Germany and Canada have comparable debts as percentages of their GDPs.

Where does the government borrow all this money from?

The debt is largely financed by the sale of Treasury bonds and bills. Even today, amid global economic turmoil, those still are seen as one of the world’s safest investments.

That’s one of the rare upsides of U.S. government borrowing.

Treasury securities are suitable for individual investors and popular with other countries, especially China, Japan and the Persian Gulf oil exporters, the three top foreign holders of U.S. debt.

But as the U.S. spends trillions to stabilize the recession-wracked economy, helping to force down the value of the dollar, the securities become less attractive as investments. Some major foreign lenders are already paring back on their purchases of U.S. bonds and other securities.

And if major holders of U.S. debt were to flee, it would send shock waves through the global economy - and sharply force up U.S. interest rates.

As time goes by, demographics suggest things will get worse before they get better, even after the recession ends, as more baby boomers retire and begin collecting Social Security and Medicare benefits.

While the president remains personally popular, polls show there is rising public concern over his handling of the economy and the government’s mushrooming debt - and what it might mean for future generations.

If things can’t be turned around, including establishing a more efficient health care system, “We are on an utterly unsustainable fiscal course,“ said the White House budget director, Peter Orszag.

Some budget-restraint activists claim even the debt understates the nation’s true liabilities.

The Peter G. Peterson Foundation, established by a former commerce secretary and investment banker, argues that the $11.4 trillion debt figures does not take into account roughly $45 trillion in unlisted liabilities and unfunded retirement and health care commitments.

That would put the nation’s full obligations at $56 trillion, or roughly $184,000 per American, according to this calculation.

—-

On the Net:

Treasury Department “to the penny” national debt breakdown: http://tinyurl.com/yrxrsh

Peter G. Peterson Foundation independent assessment of the national debt: http://www.pgpf.org/

“Deficits do Matter” debt clock: http://tinyurl.com/l6mvjb

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by bjcs on July 05, 2009 at 8:03 pm

J-reb,
Bush took an awful lot of blame for his presidency and poor running of the country.

Do you remember 9-11? do you think any of the money he spent may have went to something that didnt even exist prior to Bush’s admin, Homeland Security?

Bush made some mistakes (alot of mistakes) in the war but do you ascertain that we should not have been in the war at all?

Bush had something to show for his spend, Obama has nothing to show for his spend. He is pumping money into failing people and companies and calling it progress.

Face it, we were fooled by him. Obama does not have a clue to what he is doing. He said he had all the answers. He promised us “change” and “hope”. Twi things everybody wants. But he never said what the change would be and what he was hoping for. The one term senator thought unemployment would not raise above 8%. 1 trillion dollars later we are near 10%. Obama is very committed to spreading wealth from successfull people and companies to unsuccessfull people and companies.

The only consolation prize for those of us that voted for Obama is that the McCain Palin ticket was even flakier. McCain was a wimp that was afraid to say no to these bailouts (he is a repub who is supposed to say no) and Palin couldn’t even finish 1 term of governorship in Alaska.

But dont kid yourself, Obama is ruining this country. Change has come!

Flag Comment Posted by RepublicanX on July 05, 2009 at 10:31 am

J-reb, who freaking cares about what W did. If you want to play the sheep then do the math. 5 tril/8 years is a rate of 625 bil/year. Obama has done 1 trillion in 6 months. A rate of 2 tril/year! That is not even including what the CBO says the cap and bend over bill along with give healthcare to lazy people is going to put us on the hook for. W may have balooned the deficit to fight 2 wars and give a prescription drug plan to old folks but he did not bury us under government excrement. Its sheep like you living in the United States of Entertainment that has condemned us by voting for unqualified retards like Obama.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on July 04, 2009 at 11:45 pm

Bush took the Debt from $5 Trillion to $10 Trillion, and had absolutely no excuse for doing so.  And escaped without any blame or responsibility. 

Now, under Obama, the Debt has increased from $10 to $11 Trillion.  How that constitutes “tripling” the National Debt is clear only to your average brain-addled talk-radio addict.

That is all.

Flag Comment Posted by Whitty1 on July 04, 2009 at 1:03 pm

I think the debt clock is going to need more digits soon? I wish I could print money like our finest in government.

Flag Comment Posted by Question Govt on July 04, 2009 at 9:19 am

On a day intended to celebrate our freedom, it is sad and discouraging to contemplate the extent to which we, the People, have allowed hate-promoting partisan professional political operatives of every party, their partisan allies, and their political action committees to seize control of our political system. The tragic result is that time after time we continue to elect or re-elect people who are interested only in their own selfish personal or extremely partisan agendas and care nothing about the welfare of the average American citizen.

I do not intend to absolve any President from blame for economic irresponsibility, however, it is the Congress that is intended to control the “National purse strings” and to which oversight responsibilities belong. Chiefly, it is they who have, for reasons of self-interest or rabid party alliances, absolutely failed to come anywhere close to discharging either of these crucial responsibilities adequately.


So long as we voters are content to tolerate, support, believe, and rely on extremely hateful and partisan propaganda, deliberate misrepresentation, and biased media reports, it is not likely the situation will improve. Our modern democratic republic suffers directly as a result of the dearth of voters willing to educate themselves adequately before going to the polls, citizens willing to offer themselves for public service motivated only by the common good, and leaders with the intellect and reason of James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and those Founding Fathers whose memories we recall today.

Like many of his predecessors, the current President proposes one ill-conceived program after another without having even the slightest clue about whether the taxpayers can afford them, what they really will cost, how they will be financed, and whether they are feasible or will even be effective.

By our continued willingness to rely on party propaganda, hateful misrepresentation, and biased media reports, we have elected the most liberal and least qualified President in history, and Congress, composed of members of both parties elected as a result of our same foolish reliance on inaccurate, biased, and unreliable information, continues to support or acquiesce to his ill-conceived agenda with complete disregard for the welfare of America and in complete allegiance to rabid partisanship.

I can see no way to extinguish the unconscionable and excessive debt being foist upon us but confiscatory taxes which will further damage our economy, increase reliance on social welfare, and lead to a dramatic decline in the standard of living, security, and freedom for every U.S. Citizen.

Rabid partisanship has supplanted the “public good” and until we, the People, reclaim our constitutional rights by refusing to vote for candidates about whom we know precious little that can be factually proven, this tragic circumstance will remain unchanged.

Flag Comment Posted by RepublicanX on July 04, 2009 at 7:46 am

The country has not been debt free since Andrew Jackson. Every President since holds responsibility for the national debt. At this point it is as if Presidents do not even care anymore. Unsupportable debt caused Rome to fall and we are next.

Flag Comment Posted by drhoagie on July 04, 2009 at 6:32 am

No one will argue that President Bush pushed up the national debt.  We heard it daily from the partisan press and those get on teevee who exist to read George Soros talking points while looking pretty.
But one thing is refreshing;  With Obama tripling the debt left to him by President Bush in a matter of months and already outspending every president from George Washington through President Bush, Obama has taken every piece of “ammo” out of the Obama-medias arsenal when it comes to Bush bashing.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement