GM out of bankruptcy, pledges to be more responsive

GM out of bankruptcy, pledges to be more responsive

AP

The path is now clear for General Motors to leave bankruptcy protection in record time.

» 31 Comments | Post a Comment

Ownership stake

Here is the breakdown of who will own the new General Motors:
61 percent:
U.S. government
17.5 percent: United Auto Workers union through its retiree health-care trust
11.7 percent:
Canadian government
9.8 percent: bondholders from the old company
SOURCE: The Associated Press

 

DETROIT — General Motors completed an unusually quick exit from bankruptcy protection on Friday with ambitions of making money and building cars people are eager to buy.

Once the world’s largest and most powerful automaker, new GM is now leaner, cleansed of massive debt and burdensome contracts that would have sunk it without federal loans.

But GM, whose 40 days under court supervision was far shorter than anyone predicted, faces the worst auto sales slump in a quarter-century.

At a news conference, CEO Fritz Henderson said the revamped automaker will be faster and more responsive to customers than the old one. It will generate cash and repay billions in government loans ahead of a 2015 deadline.

The new company will build more cars and trucks that consumers want and launch them faster than in the past, the CEO said. GM also announced a partnership with online retailer eBay to test auctioning vehicles online.

“We recognize that we’ve been given a rare second chance at GM, and we are very grateful for that. And we appreciate the fact that we now have the tools to get the job done,“ he said.

Known for its sluggish decision-making process and bloated management ranks, GM will create a single, eight-member executive committee to speed up day-to-day decision-making, replacing two senior leadership forums.

Henderson said General Motors Corp. will streamline its bureaucratic management structure, cutting U.S. salaried employment by 20 percent, or 6,150 positions, by the end of 2009. The cuts include 450 executive jobs.

Henderson, who was promoted to chief executive in March, will run the global company and oversee its North American operations. GM’s former chief operating officer, Henderson was chosen when President Barack Obama said former CEO Rick Wagoner’s restructuring plans didn’t go far enough.

Top executives at the new company will focus on business results, new vehicles, brands and consumers.

Bob Lutz, a legendary industry executive, was “unretiring” to become a vice chairman responsible for creative elements of products, marketing and customer relationships, Henderson said. Lutz had previously planned to retire at the end of the year after more than four decades in the auto business.

Nick Reilly, who has served as GM’s Asia-Pacific president, will become executive vice president of GM’s international operations based in Shanghai, China.

The new company will focus on customers, cars and culture.

“If we don’t get this right, nothing else is going to work,“ Henderson said at GM’s Downtown Detroit headquarters. “Business as usual is over at General Motors.“

The automaker is launching a “Tell Fritz” Web site to allow owners and the public to share their concerns with senior management, and Henderson plans to go out on the road every month.

He said GM will partner with eBay in California to allow consumers to bid on vehicles just as they would in a typical eBay auction. They could also choose a “Buy it Now” option in an experiment to make car shopping easier. Dealers would still distribute the cars.

“As a culture, General Motors needs to be prepared to experiment and adjust,“ he said.

New Chairman Edward Whitacre Jr. said GM’s trip through bankruptcy protection had been extremely challenging. “There have been a lot of long hours, there have been a shuttering of plants, there have been painful layoffs.“

Whitacre cited the “strong leadership” of Henderson and the management team, giving the CEO a vote of confidence.

The company’s logo will remain blue with white underlined GM letters, although the company had considered changing the background to green to symbolize an environmental focus. GM has no plans to change the background, Henderson said.

He said the U.S. government, which owns a majority stake in GM, has vowed that it would not get involved in day-to-day decisions.

The Treasury Department released a statement Friday afternoon crediting GM’s restructuring with saving both the automaker and “tens of thousands” of American jobs.

“The hard work of charting a path to viability now rests with GM’s board and management,“ Treasury said in its statement. “But we are confident that we remain on track to ultimately see returns on these taxpayer investments.“

GM received $19 billion to $20 billion more in federal aid on Friday, the remainder of the $50 billion it will receive, Henderson said. A large part of the money will be held in escrow.

GM, in a viability plan presented to the government, said it would break even before interest and taxes next year, and be slightly above break-even for 2011 on a pretax basis.

“Sitting here today, I don’t have any reason to disbelieve those numbers,“ Henderson said, giving no details of when the company would make a net profit.

Turning a profit will not be easy. GM has piled up losses and survives only because of government loans.

Besides the U.S. government’s 61 percent controlling interest, the United Auto Workers union gets a 17.5 percent stake of the company through its retiree health care trust, and the Canadian government will control 11.7 percent. The remaining shares went to bondholders of the old company.

Concessions made by the United Auto Workers union just before the company entered bankruptcy protection have brought GM’s labor costs down to where they are fully competitive with Toyota Motor Corp., Henderson said.

The parts of GM not moving to the new company will become part of “old GM,“ a collection of assets and liabilities that will be sold to pay creditors.

___

Ken Thomas reported from Washington, D.C.. AP Auto Writer Kimberly S. Johnson and AP Business Writer Jeff Karoub in Detroit contributed to this report.

 

Advertisement

 
View More: latest news,gm,bankuptcy,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by mikeyt on July 11, 2009 at 1:50 pm

GM cut dealers, jobs and brands to try to stop the losses, but they still are using the same business model. The business model is the problem.

GM won’t go back into bankruptcy during Obama’s term because he’ll just keep pumping our tax dollars into the company so the UAW won’t suffer. But once Obama’s gone in 2012, it won’t be two years before GM is back in Chapter 11.

Flag Comment Posted by ziggy on July 11, 2009 at 10:12 am

oneuseer, my company has already paid back the funds that were given to them by the govt. Companies were basically forced to take these funds so my tax dollars went there with yours. I don’t work for one of the poorly run financial giants… I work for one of the better run companies. I agree that some of them are a bigger burden but don’t lose sight that many of those companies have paid back the TARP funds already.

Flag Comment Posted by JohnBottom on July 11, 2009 at 9:38 am

Last time I checked, Ford, Toyota, Honda, VW, etc. are all losing BILLIONS of dollars hand over fist.  In fact, Honda and Toyota both have changed CEO’s over the past few months.  That’s what happens when the U.S. market goes from 16 million new vehicle sales in 07 to around 9 million this year, which is a direct result of the economy’s collapse(caused by the Fed’s poor monetary policy and the Govt’s poor fiscal policy), not the other way around.  The ONLY reason Ford did not have to take any goverment loans is because their CEO Alan Mulally mortgaged ALL the company’s assets a couple years ago, as he knew Ford would go bankrupt without doing so.  That is the difference between good upper management and bad upper management. 

As for those of you who complain about domestic vehicles being built in Mexico/Canada, have you taken a second to think why they are doing this??  I’m going to go out on a limb and say that it’s CHEAPER!  That’s the bottom line, period.  There is no other reason to do so other than cutting costs.  If you want more products built in America and more American jobs, write your congressman and tell him to abolish minimum wage laws.  It doesn’t take an economist like myself to see that as the minimum wage increases, unemployment increases. 

And for those of you still not convinced the American manufacturers make quality vehicles, the 09 JD Power Initial Quality study has Ford, Chevrolet, and Toyota in a virtual tie.  In fact, Ford and Chevrolet both rank higher than Infiniti, Nissan, Acura, BMW, Audi, VW, Mazda, Subaru, and the list goes on.  Chrysler/Dodge did not fare as well.  Cadillac ranked 3rd behind Lexus and Porsche.  Buy whatever car you want for whatever reason you want, just don’t lose sight of the fact that the Government is to blame for this recession.

Flag Comment Posted by bholl on July 11, 2009 at 7:11 am

CEO speech,  was that a comedy routine?
Well, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt:  hahahahahahahahahahahahah

Can you say Hummer?

Tried to sell the environmentally worst consumer vehicle on earth to possibly the worst Polluter on Earth, China.
Does this indicate that GM has learned anything?

I don’t think so.  The new GM is the pre-chapter 7 bankrupt company!

Flag Comment Posted by Ken on July 11, 2009 at 4:37 am

My 2008 Impala wasn’t made in the USA.  None of them are.  My next car will not be a Government Motors vehicle.  It will be a Ford Product.  I bought my Ford truck because it was made in Norfolk and have been very happy with it.  My Escape was made in St Louis and it has been great.  I bought a Canadian Chevrolet instead of a Mexican Ford.  I would have had to buy a Honda, Toyota or Hyundai to get an American made car in the size I wanted.

Flag Comment Posted by ripsomelips on July 10, 2009 at 11:35 pm

ziggy, you said you American cars are pieces of crap. GM is American. 1492 was “pivotal” in American history. GM exists because of that “pivot”. You give advice. You said that union workers are lazy and think the world owes them something. I stated that my union training allows me to build that ship using primitive tools. I can navigate it using primitive math. I am betting that if they pull the plug, you are lost. Every comfort you enjoy has a union member attached to it. The trade deficit we have has grown with every year union membership has declined. GM also come from the Revolutionary War.Without it, no GM! During that war, people had to decide something. Sacrafice for the benefit of all and join the revoloution. Or save themselves by giving in to the British. It takes backbone to join hands and stand together. Cowards think of themselves.

Flag Comment Posted by oneuser on July 10, 2009 at 10:40 pm

ziggy, If you work for a financial institution they are a bigger drain on the economy than GM or the union. We taxpayers have contributed billions of dollars so you can sit there and complain about another poorly run company, just like the financial institutions were very poorly run.

Flag Comment Posted by ziggy on July 10, 2009 at 10:19 pm

Uh, what? Wow, talk about going off into la la land with those comments. What does a GPS device in 1492 have to do with GM? I work for a financial company, no union and we get company paid training and classes. No union dues needed there. No work stoppages either. Evidently the union is in bed with you, you might want to turn on the lights and see how ugly it is.

Flag Comment Posted by ripsomelips on July 10, 2009 at 9:43 pm

well ziggy, unless you can afford a true import, in your words, you bought an American built piece of crap. Ford didn’t ask for bailout. Terminology of “Big Three” is from the 1960’s. “Big Three” are buzzwords the media uses to mezmorize sheeple. If people aren’t union, they are anti-union. Even if it sucks, work where I work, it’s great. even if it’s a piece of crap, but what I bought, it’s great. No facts, just self proclaimed brilliance. The people who founded this nation navigated ships to get here. No GPS. They used tools and mathematics to do it. My union training allows me to do just that. I would bet that you don’t know how you got here. Much less how to get back. 1492 knows more than you? Reveal what it is you do or produce, I don’t want to buy American. Nothing but junk there.

Flag Comment Posted by ziggy on July 10, 2009 at 9:07 pm

I won’t buy american because they’re pieces of crap. I’ll take a product built buy a hungry worker any day over one built buy a union worker who thinks the world owes him something. Working is a privelage, not a right. I’m a consumer, I could care less if the workers have personal problems. Give me a good car that lasts and is cheap. GM, Ford and Chevy don’t make those. The Big Three don’t know how to run a business anymore, why should we buy from that?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement