GRTC site to be used for affordable housing?

» 15 Comments | Post a Comment

Richmond plans a public debate over the future of GRTC Transit System's historic headquarters next to the Fan District, but the role of affordable housing in the project already is an issue.

Affordable housing is listed as the goal of Mayor Dwight C. Jones and the mission of the Richmond Redevelopment & Housing Authority in a written proposal for the city to buy the property, which is appraised at up to $5.4 million.

The 6.8-acre site is at 101 S. Davis along the 2400-2500 blocks of West Cary Street.

However, the chairman of the housing authority said the proposal is not aimed at developing low-income housing on the property.

"Personally, I don't think that would be the appropriate spot for it," Elliott M. Harrigan, chairman of the RRHA Board of Commissioners, said yesterday.

Tammy D. Hawley, the mayor's press secretary, reiterated yesterday that the administration has not begun to consider how the property might be developed if the city is able to acquire it. "No specific plans for this site have been determined," she said.

Harrigan, owner of a real estate company that operates outside of Richmond, said he met with the mayor more than two months ago about the administration's proposal for RRHA to acquire the GRTC property and oversee its redevelopment.

"I asked whether this was going to have a low-income housing component in it, and my understanding was that it would not," he said. Instead, Harrigan said Jones wants the authority to buy and hold the property, while a new city committee conducts a public process to determine its best use. The site includes buildings constructed more than a century ago to house the city's trolley cars. The project also would depend on the City Council appropriating up to $5 million to buy the property from GRTC over 20 years.

However, the administration's plan already has rankled City Councilman E. Martin Jewell, whose 5th District includes the GRTC property.

"I find it interesting that they would contemplate being a real estate broker," by buying the property and flipping it to a developer, Jewell said yesterday. "It is a prized piece of land whose highest and best use would not necessarily be affordable housing."

T.K. Somanath, executive director of the Better Housing Coalition, has overseen the development of 100 units of affordable housing along West Cary Street within several blocks of the GRTC property. "I think there could be a component for affordable housing," he said yesterday.

The proposal was approved by the housing authority board in May, but not by GRTC's board of directors, which first learned of the project at a meeting in mid-June, according to Chairman Daniel K. Smith. The board has seen the proposed contract but will not be prepared to act before its August meeting, Smith said yesterday. "We have not made any decision regarding that contract whatsoever."

Smith was appointed to the six-member board by Chesterfield County, which owns half of the transit system. He said he has discussed the proposal with Chesterfield County Administrator James J.L. Stegmaier and Supervisor Daniel A. Gecker

"One goal, first and foremost, is to get fair market value for the property," Smith said.

The transit system has received an appraisal that values the property between $4.7 million and $5.4 million, according to an eight-page overview prepared by GRTC and RRHA attorneys. The money would be paid over 20 years, with an interest rate of 5 percent.

In addition to providing a long-term revenue stream, the proposal would enable GRTC to avoid hiring a consultant to help it sell the property, said John M. Lewis Jr., chief executive officer of the transit company. "What makes the deal attractive to GRTC is that it's clean."

GRTC would bear the cost of identifying and cleaning up any environmental contamination of the property, which has eight underground fuel storage tanks. Lewis said the system has money reserved in its capital budget to cover those costs, which could exceed $1 million.

The written overview of the proposal does not say what uses the city would propose for the property, which is part of the Fan Area Historic District Extension in the National Register of Historic Places. However, the proposal cites the "administration's goal to provide high quality affordable housing within the city" and the RRHA's mission "to be the catalyst for quality affordable housing and community revitalization."



Contact Michael Martz at (804) 649-6964 or .

Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on July 19, 2009 at 10:39 pm

I was just thinking about how unaffordable housing is in Richmond. It is so hard to come up with $400 rent or pay a mortgage on a $150,000 house.  The city government should definitely start flipping properties to fill the burgeoning market for sub-$300/mo rentals. 

I would instruct Mayor Jones to recruit more high paying employers instead of bargain basement tenements.

Flag Comment Posted by theobserver on July 19, 2009 at 6:01 pm

You can’t manage a city /for/ poor people—not if you want a dynamic, nice city. That’s simply a fact. David Dinkins tried that in NYC and it didn’t work. Cities need money, and it comes from businesses that generate jobs and from //middle-income// people. If you cater to the poor population—and I say this as someone who is a Democrat and voted for Obama—you will never have anything more than a city for poor people, and that’s a recipe for a bad city. I am not insensitive to the needs of the poor, but Richmond needs to attract middle-income people—and if the mayor doesn’t understand that, he should go back to being a preacher. But then this has long been a problem with Richmond and its mayors, to be candid.

Flag Comment Posted by dc on July 19, 2009 at 7:13 am

The comments thus far have been, for the most part, very negative towards the concept of a mixed-income development. Nationwide, the realization is that pockets of poverty do not work. Low-income developments do not work. The only answer is to make developments mixed-income. Create a community!

This site is perfect for mixed-income community development. Close to shops and stores, a city park for ALL citizens to enjoy. Public transportation. Access to many JOBS so that the low-income residents can have a place to work. Come on people! Put your thinking caps on for one minute and look at the big picture. The area surrounding the bus depot has been, pretty much, all low-income development. Just to the east, the houses south of Cary are all pretty much low-income residents. Just to the west is more low to middle income housing, a few small businesses that cater to low-income residents. If you don’t believe me, take a drive over there. I see it almost every day.

The mayor (even though I do not like his governing style) is right on this one. Purchase the property BEFORE the property values begin to rise again, and use this development as the centerpiece to back up the talk of mixed-income development. Never mind the nay-sayers. They will gripe and complain no matter what is built. Just DO THE RIGHT THING!! Build something for ALL to enjoy.

Flag Comment Posted by Common_Sense on July 19, 2009 at 1:06 am

Well… the people that voted for him are the same people that will be living in the affordable housing. Face it the majority of citizens in Richmond are low-middle income or young students or young graduates AKA democrats. Cant get mad at the Mayor.. he’s just serving his constituents.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on July 18, 2009 at 3:26 pm

Apparently Mayor Dwight C. Jones and Company haven’t noticed that the entire nation is suffering from a glut of housing supply.  The very last thing we need is to build more, not to mention wasting the citizens’ money in the process.

If Mayor Dwight C. Jones wants to do something useful for the poor people of Richmond, he might focus on education and job training, two areas sorely lacking in the underclass.  Then they might be able to learn how to hold down actual jobs and get their own housing, along with a certain amount of pride that comes from actual accomplishment.  And THAT is how you bring down crime and rescue an ailing city. 

Handouts, in the end, help no one except the self-perpetuating government bureaucracy.

Flag Comment Posted by dklee on July 18, 2009 at 10:59 am

this idea is EXACTLY what carytown needs to get back into business.  you develop a place where people can’t afford to buy anything, where they just commit crimes, and depreciate the property value of surrounding houses nearby. 

I say we put them in petersburg.  that area already looks like a warzone.

Flag Comment Posted by ddub28 on July 18, 2009 at 10:59 am

A new city administration that’s just as clueless as the ones in the past. No wonder everyone prefers to live in the counties. Richmond will just become even more of a “Hood” with these “projects”.

Flag Comment Posted by tripower on July 18, 2009 at 9:08 am

Affordable housing is just liberal code word for subsidized housing which is code word for The Projects.

Breaking news Mr. Mayor…you are NOT a real estate developer. You know nothing about this business so leave it to the pros. More breaking news, people who live in “Affordable housing” DO NOT generate revenue for the city.

Keep doing crap like this and people will move out to the counties even faster than they already are.

Flag Comment Posted by LexTalionis on July 18, 2009 at 9:08 am

One of three things will happen with the City’s involvement. 1) We’ll have another housing project: the jewel in the crown of Carytown. 2) Someone in the City government, their friends or relatives will make a bundle on a deal involving the property. OR: 3)We’ll have another 6th St. Marketplace type of thing. We can count on a few things. The City will spend an obscene amount of money “studying” what to do…and then they’ll mess it up.

Flag Comment Posted by spydrz on July 18, 2009 at 8:47 am

I’m pretty sure the Fan already has tons of inexpensive apartments…don’t students live there?  They can’t all afford $1200/mo flats.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement