Pastor questions Richmond’s new stormwater utility fee
|
WANT TO APPEAL? Property owners in Richmond have 60 days to appeal after receiving a stormwater assessment notice. Appeals need to include documentation of how an assessment was in error. For information, call (804) 644-3000 and choose the stormwater prompt. |
The Rev. Mat Brown worries that Richmond has lost sight of one of Virginia's commandments: Thou shalt not tax churches.
He's trying to make sense of the city's new stormwater utility fee and questioning why churches should have to pay it, just as owners of homes and business properties do.
"Churches are different. We are always treated differently," said Brown, pastor of Branch's Baptist Church in South Richmond. "The precedent is that the government sees that what we do is a worthy thing."
The city recently sent out its first stormwater assessments to the owners of more than 68,000 properties. Based on its two notices, Branch's Baptist can expect a bill of $6,075 this fall. That's more than the church spends annually on its ministry programs for children, young adults and seniors, and it'll likely force leaders to dip into a meager reserve fund, Brown said.
City officials said they sympathize with churches and others who object to the fee, but they emphasize that they're trying to correct drainage problems that have plagued the city for decades. Chesterfield and Henrico counties do not charge a similar fee.
The city's fee is charged on developed properties based on the amount of space taken up by parking lots, rooftops and other hard or "impervious" surfaces that cause rain and melted snow to run off rather than to seep into the ground.
After years of debate, Mayor Dwight C. Jones recommended and the City Council approved the fee this spring to provide a dedicated source of funding for maintaining and improving stormwater management. Officials expect to collect $7.8 million this fiscal year, and a list of improvement projects is being developed. In the past, such projects had to compete with other city needs for funding.
Under the program, single-family homes are being charged a flat rate of $25, $45 or $70 depending on the amount of impervious space.
Other properties, including businesses, apartment buildings, churches and those owned by other nonprofit groups, are charged a fee that's based on dividing the total impervious area by 1,425, which is the median square-footage value of impervious area for all single-family parcels.
The calculation determines the number of "equivalent residential units" for the property, which is then multiplied by the $45 rate. Bills are to be mailed beginning in September.
Based on its assessments, Branch's Baptist has 192,396 square feet of impervious area, much of it in the asphalt parking lot that wraps around the church-building complex at Walmsley and Broad Rock boulevards.
Brown questions the city's numbers, as well as its decision to charge a higher rate on a church-owned house because it's in a parcel that includes some parking lot. He also wonders why the church must pay a fee on part of a parking lot that drains into woods that are owned by the church.
"It just seems very arbitrary," he said.
Branch's Baptist looks like a big church, but that's largely an indication of its past. The sanctuary was built in 1949. It regularly accommodated 1,600 people for Sunday services during the 1950s, Brown said. Now, a typical Sunday attracts about 250 worshippers.
The city determined the size of impervious areas on parcels by using assessment records and aerial photos, said Angela Fountain, a spokeswoman for the Department of Public Utilities.
City officials had considered charging a reduced rate for churches and nonprofits, but attorneys concluded that state law doesn't allow such discounts, Fountain said. She said the city may ask the General Assembly to approve legislation that would allow more property owners to receive credits for rain gardens or other features that reduce the impacts of runoff.
Brown said he intends to appeal the church's assessments, and he's contacting other religious leaders to lobby for exemptions for religious organizations and nonprofits.
"The large question is, should we be charged this at all?" he said.
Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
The pastor has to come up with $116.83 a week. For a congregation of 250, that’s an additional $0.47 cents in the collection plate a week. Not a bad investment for cleaner water.
The pastor doesn’t acknowledge that the stormwater charge is not a tax, it is a fee, big difference. By asking an exempt organization (church) to not pay the fee is the same as saying “everyone else should pay our share”. One solution for him is to remove some of the asphalt parking area.
One of the good things about the SW utility is that it is just about the most discussed issue we have seen in the past several years. More than a dozen public hearings around the city, several districst meetings, mass mailings, etc. In fact, I believe Rev. Brown attended one of those meetings and stormed out halfway through. The information has been more than clear about the need, and the type of projects to be addressed.
Churches already get huge tax exemptions in Va. Both Federal and State tax law and City ordinances give them breaks which already amount to citizens supporting them. They are lucky; why do they get exemptions in the first place?
As a former DPU employee in the city , storm water run off is a huge problem and the storm water drains are old and need to be modernized. Churches should not be excempt from paying utility bills or taxes. The property that these churches stand on contribute to the run off and so when there’s a problem the church leaders call DPU and complain and want the drains fixed but they haven’t contributed financially. The fact that there’s a church on every corner of the city and vacant store front doesn’t help either. I attend church every Sunday and I am on my church’s finance council and we (the church is not in the city) have to pay our utilities or they get cut off. I agree churches should not be excempt from paying for improvements to problems they contribute to. As to where the money is going, go to the city’s website and look up their budget p/department, now if you believe it or not that the money will be be used for improvements its up to you but someone, somewhere has to pay and it shouldn’t be just residents and business owners.
Every person, every business and every church contributes to the runoff problem. Why should churches be exempt from paying their share along with everyone else?
This discussion brings up another question. Why are churches exempt from paying taxes in the first place? This loophole should be eliminated as every taxpaying citizen is subsidizing their existence.
To the good pastor. The environement doesn’t care whether the runoff is from a church or a 7-11. Your property shold contribute as much as the next. Be a good neighbor and make the payment. If your congregation cares, they will up the ante to use this property for their chosen purpose.
Was the church built for free? I doubt it. Is the telephone and power provided for free? I doubt it. Should the church get a pass on local environmental needs. Absolutely not. Pave less, and you’ll pay less.
This area has a huge problem with the drainage. Every time it rains for any amount of time, some of the roads become impassable. One of the contributing factors is the amount of trash that people throw in the street and down storm drains. It clogs them up so the water cannot drain. If people would act like they are civilized and use garbage cans, some of the flooding could be avoided. Otherwise, the government has to use tax money to clean and fix the drains. This is to avoid devastating floods that ruin houses, businesses, and churches.
There are lots of businesses that do good work for society. Churches are not the special little exception to everything bad in our system. The churches are some of the largest properties and should pay for upkeep of the infrastructure that they use. They also need to pay taxes if they want to participate in the process of government. It is not free. We all pay taxes, personal, business, sales, income. It goes to pay for the government that the churches want to be a huge part of, and sometimes control. They need to contribute to that process.I say pay taxes or get out of the government.
God makes storms so He should have to pay for the clean up of His glorious mess. It’s therefore logical to use church money; in fact, they should pay the whole bill. Perhaps they can instead build holy holding ponds and collect the water to fix the problem.
One might also question why these cult businesses are exempt from paying taxes to begin with.
Diverting the runoff from the house is one step but I think they’d still have the problem with the runoff from the other hard surfaces such as driveways, parking lots and roads.
During excess periods of rain a normally dry gulley beside our house becomes a raging body of water due to all of the run off from up and across the street. It then travels down to connect with Falling Creek that runs behind our house and will eventually travel to the James.
Fortunately not a problem for us but in other areas where you don’t have the opportunity for it to lead naturally into a creek or river it must travel through the sewers so I’m thinking that the dollars are going to be used to replace the City’s sewers which are in desperate need to be upgraded. The Shockoe Bottom is one area that comes to mind as being in need of upgrades.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement