Richmond adds SWAT officers to weekend patrols

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment

A red light flashed on a computer screen inside the squad car, signaling a priority call:

Robbery outside the Econo Lodge on Midlothian Turnpike. No gun displayed. Suspect in a black puffy jacket. Last seen fleeing toward Carnation Street.

It wasn't necessarily an unusual robbery call, but on Saturday night, a pair of officers from Richmond's SWAT team hurried toward the scene.

Sgt. Mike Bohannon squeezed the cruiser through a closed security gate at a nearby apartment complex, and then he and officer Brian Robinson got out and followed other officers led by a police dog. The dog lost the track, and the two officers returned to their squad car and their roving patrol duty.

The city's Special Weapons and Tactics team used to only get called out for special missions such as hostage rescues or drug raids. But Police Chief Bryan T. Norwood has added SWAT team members to the patrol mix on weekend nights.

They provide tactical expertise on high-risk calls, as well as on-scene training for regular patrol officers.

The deployment is called Support through Rapid Tactical response, or SRT. It took effect in mid-November, shortly after Norwood's first day as chief on Nov. 3.

On Friday nights, four SWAT officers are on patrol from about 8 p.m. until 3 a.m., with one two-man team focused primarily on the north side of the James River, and the other team on the south side.

On Saturday nights, a third two-man team is added to float throughout the city.

Their marked squad cars are loaded with equipment such as rifles, helmets, shields, body armor, breaching rams and Tasers, so they can get to them quickly. But city residents shouldn't expect to see officers patrolling in full tactical gear.

"The concept isn't that they wear this stuff and they walk out of the car looking like RoboCop," Assistant Chief David M. McCoy said.

The tactical patrol teams generally respond to major calls such as shootings, robberies, home invasions and anything that seems like it could pose a safety threat. They provide backup and perform duties such as helping to set up a perimeter during sticky situations.

"They are not out there to handle normal calls for service," McCoy said.

They also act as advisers to regular patrol officers, helping them brush up on their tactical skills. Unlike regular officers, Richmond's SWAT team members each get more than 200 hours of advanced tactical training per year.

"If you're not consistently training on tactical responses -- although you might be good at it -- you lose an edge," McCoy said.

Neither Chesterfield County nor Henrico County, the Richmond area's two most populous localities, assigns SWAT team officers to patrol duties. Members of Richmond's SWAT team, of course, are still on call for various missions, including situations in which an armed person is holed up and refuses to surrender, and they assist in serving high-risk search warrants and arrest warrants. They also protect dignitaries when requested.

The team was called out for 17 missions in 2008.

The SWAT team consists of 19 officers, including the team's commander, Lt. Brian Corrigan.

Corrigan said the deployment has been well received by other officers out in the field.

"You've got the immediate response right there," he said.
Contact Reed Williams at (804) 649-6332 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: swat,richmond police,bryan norwood,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by dklee on January 07, 2009 at 8:11 pm

If the SWAT members were doing nothing but sit in their HQ waiting for that top priority call, that happened only 17 times last year, they should be deployed.  but if SWAT members are part of the regular force, and do other stuff when not part of swat, i think they need a break.

Flag Comment Posted by RUKiddingMe on January 07, 2009 at 7:40 pm

Dear former/original member of the Church Hill Rangers, why stop at SWAT?  Let’s call in several members of the National Guard to go with it.  I mean, with VCIT task forces and RAVE task forces running around the City, I just question the additional “show” of force on the ordinary citizen.  The simple fact that you consider my opinion whine when I am concerned about my civil rights goes to show that you have never been victimized nor targeted when innocent.  The patrol individuals and homicide are doing just fine.  I know that SWAT members take on additional duties, this was part of my point.
Now, since you have identified yourself as a Church Hill Ranger, I guess you share a common sign, symbol or name with at least 3 or more individuals in the City.  Be careful, under 18.2-46.2, SWAT members should come out and charge you for participating in a criminal street gang.  Kudos to RPD for protecting the folks, but really, do we need an additional show of force?

Flag Comment Posted by Trafdlo60 on January 07, 2009 at 6:01 pm

Well, having been a member of RPD for 23 years and retired with some service in specialized units, I would say this is a welcomed sight for the officers on the street who could use this tacitcal advantage and assistance.  I do agree with Winds of C that is is really tough on spouses and family, but hey, its always tough on family.  Hey guys on SWAT.  Maybe now that you are on a mandatory street assignment you guys can finally get those “take home cars” you’ve deserved for many years.

Flag Comment Posted by Winds of C on January 07, 2009 at 5:27 pm

Contrary to what RUKiddingMe might think, he/she fails to grasp any concept of what this means to the officers of SWAT.  Every member of the SWAT Team is a volunteer that devotes countless hours to training and making the City as safe as it can possibly be under their watch.  In doing so, they give up the valuable time that mosy devote to their families.  It’s a devotion to one’s belief’s and to another; but it is also a sacrifice to their own family. What RUKiddingMe fails to consider is each SWAT Team member quite possibly has additional responsibilities in addition to that which they already have.  If I were one of their spouses, I’d be pissed upset at whoever made the decision to have them work above & beyond what they already do.  But…most government agencies take and fail to give back. Even corporate America squeezes everything it can from its employees; and very few qualify as “human corporations”.  So, to RUKiddingMe, my respose is, “I’m so sorry I have no cheese to go with your whine.“

Signed,
One of the Original “Church Hill Rangers”

Flag Comment Posted by RUKiddingMe on January 07, 2009 at 4:35 pm

I know we are patting ourselves on the back for the homicide decrease.  I also know that since the decrease, robberies in the area on the increase, but SWAT personnel on the street now?  Am I being paranoid or is Richmond starting to feel more and more like a “police” state?  What’s next . . . sniper’s on the roof top?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement