Va. Board of Education votes to keep 3rd grade history SOL test

» 4 Comments | Post a Comment

The state Board of Education this morning unanimously voted to keep the third grade history and social science SOL test.

Several speakers urged the board to keep the test, which has generated lots of discussion about the state's Standards of Learning system.

State Superintendent of Instruction Patricia I. Wright had proposed eliminating the test, but last week withdrew her proposal. The test covers material taught in kindergarten through third grade.

Wright changed course after bipartisan disapproval of the idea, which she said would save money and cut out a test that is not federally mandated.

For more on the debate, see tomorrow's Richmond Times-Dispatch.

-- Olympia Meola

Advertisement

 
View More: latest news,city of richmond,board of education,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by concerned on June 26, 2009 at 8:23 pm

View the archived webcast at :

http://edlabor.house.gov/hearings/2009/05/examining-the-abusive-and-dead.shtml

View all 4 segments of Jason’s story:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpuDDXSJQd8

Flag Comment Posted by one89 on June 25, 2009 at 3:14 pm

If the SOLs were about “teacher accountability” only then would there probably be less of an issue about them. However, the SOLs are only succeeding in “dumbing up” our children. Children who have only been exposed to the SOLs have very little ability to critically analyze anything anymore and in all actuality critical analysis is discouraged. In the real world, they MUST demonstrate critical analysis skills to be able to survive.  What, I ask, was wrong with the former way of teaching our children? Are we as a society saying that everyone who attended school prior to the SOLs are ignorant and received a below standard education? Then, if that is the point, I for one beg to differ. We—or at least I (older individuals) received an excellent education without the SOLs—but I don’t think my grandchildren will be able to say that.  We are losing an entire generation of young people who are being taught to “memorize” the answer to 1+1, but don’t ever ask them to explain the varied reasons for why the sky is blue b/c that requires that they critically assess the possible reasons like: the gases in the atmosphere or the “power of God” or how the colors blend together to create ‘blue’.  Furthermore, the answers on the tests are very subjective, yet there is only one answer that is acceptable—which then penalizes a student for being able to think outside of the box.  For example, one question on the first grade test ask: What do we have now that we did not have years ago. The “correct” answer was computers machine; however sewing machine was also one of the options.  Now for a first grader, the computer has been around FOREVER, but chances are they know very little about a sewing machine—which also was not around at some point “years ago”, yet if a student selected sewing machine it was considered wrong. Only one answer acceptable, yet there were two possible answers. 

In my opinion, not only do we need to get rid of third grade SOLs, but we need to get rid of all standardized test because what is “standard” for one race or ethnicity (or person), may not be “standard” for another.  We need to allow the teachers to once again be creative and come up with ways to teach a diverse group of students—some of whom are visual learners, while others may be audio learners. As it stands now with the SOLs—all of the students had better have a good memory b/c that is all they are learning - how to build their memorization skills—but don’t ask them anything that requires them to think.  So sad…

Flag Comment Posted by Roon on June 25, 2009 at 12:24 pm

This is a response to edrebber: Are you a public school teacher? Are you a student in the public school system? Did you have to take the SOLs? If none of the above are true, then I feel like you are speaking outside of your realm of expertise. Teachers squeal (the correct spelling with with “ea” not “ee”) about SOLs not because it deals with teacher credibility and accountability, but because it merely teaches rote memorization and regurgitation. SOLs don’t test skills—it tests facts. I can tell you that as a former HS teacher and a current college faculty member that the SOLs have made our students LESS prepared for the real world, very inept at thinking for themselves, and quite inarticulate in both speaking and writing skills. It is a shame that the SOLs won’t be revised, or taken away. Teachers should be able to fail students based on their inability to meet basic requirements—did you know that students are promoted to higher grades all the while they have failed their SOL? For example, a 9th grade reading class at a local high school will have in its majority students who failed the 8th grade SOL…yet they are in High School english? Additionally, students fail the writing portion of the SOL given in English 10 and the reading portion given in English 11 and are still allowed to advance to the 12th grade. Think about it…are these tests really teaching are children anything? Don’t blame the teachers.

Flag Comment Posted by edrebber on June 25, 2009 at 11:59 am

Congratulations to the state Board of Education for shooting down this proposal.  The teachers squeel like stuck pigs when tests are put in place to measure their performance.  Obviously the Superintendent of Instruction is only trying to remove a valuable tool to measure a teachers performance so they can’t be held accountable when a student was promoted without mastering the required courses.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement