Sotomayor pledges impartial justice if confirmed

Sotomayor pledges impartial justice if confirmed

Win McNamee/AP

Celina Sotomayor, mother of Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor (left) watches as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., administers the oath to the nominee. 

» 86 Comments | Post a Comment
MULTIMEDIA
Follow the confirmation hearings via The Associated Press by Twitter
Video reports from Associated Press
Sonia Sotomayor timeline
Senate Judiciary Committee
The process of becoming a justice
MORE
Nominee puts on best face, but who is she?
Hispanic rights group at center of Sotomayor fight
Women’s groups quiet on Sotomayor
Cast of characters on Senate Judiciary Committee

WASHINGTON — Her confirmation all but assured, Sonia Sotomayor pledged Monday to serve the “larger interest of impartial justice” rather than any narrower cause if she becomes the first Hispanic on the U.S. Supreme Court.

“My personal and professional experiences help me to listen and understand, with the law always commanding the result in every case,“ Sotomayor told senators at a televised confirmation hearing.

The remarks about judicial philosophy were her first since President Barack Obama nominated the veteran of 17 years on the federal bench. They appeared aimed at Republicans who have questioned her commitment to impartiality in light of a 2001 remark that experience as a “wise Latina” might give her an advantage over white males.

The 55-year-old appeals court judge spoke after several hours of speechmaking in which Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee praised her as a Hispanic pioneer well qualified for the high court and Republicans questioned her impartiality as well as Obama’s views in nominating her, his first pick for the high court.

Despite Republican misgivings, Sen. Lindsey Graham told Sotomayor, “Unless you have a complete meltdown, you’re going to get confirmed.“

“And I don’t think you will” have a meltdown, he added quickly as Sotomayor sat listening, her face in a half-smile.

Soitomayor has no serious roadblock to become the third woman to serve on the high court. Democrats control the Judiciary panel by a 12 to 7 margin over Republicans and have the necessary floor votes to elevate Sotomayor.

In the nearly seven weeks since Obama nominated her to replace Justice David Souter, critics have labored without much success to exploit weaknesses in her record. But Republicans have had to temper their remarks to avoid offending Hispanic voters, the fastest-growing segment of the electorate.

If confirmed, Sotomayor is unlikely to change the court’s ideological makeup since she would replace Souter, part of the court’s liberal wing. Under former President George W. Bush, the court has tended to be more conservative in its rulings in recent years.

In her remarks, Sotomayor said, “The progression of my life has been uniquely American,“ that of a child of Puerto Rican parents who moved to New York during World War II. “I want to make one special note of thanks to my mom,“ she said. “I am here today because of her aspirations and sacrifices for my brother Juan and me.“

“Mom, I love that we are sharing this together,“ said Sotomayor, whose father died when she was 9. She turned as she spoke, whispering a thank-you to her mother, seated one row behind her in the packed hearing room.

Sotomayor, who spoke for only about five minutes, returns on Tuesday to begin hours of questioning from committee members who will cast the first votes on her appointment.

The role of racial politics in the day’s proceedings became clear within minutes after Sen. Patrick Leahy, the committee chairman, rapped the opening gavel.

“She’s been a judge for all Americans. She’ll be a justice for all Americans,“ said the Democrat.

“Let no one demean this extraordinary woman,“ Leahy said in a warning to committee Republicans to tread lightly in the days ahead.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, the top Republican, vowed a “respectful tone” and “maybe some disagreements” when lawmakers begin questioning Sotomayor on Tuesday.

Moments later, he took aim at Sotomayor’s 2001 statement that her standing as a “wise Latina woman” would sometimes allow her to reach a better decision than a white male.

“I will not vote for, and no senator should vote for an individual nominated by any president who believes it is acceptable for a judge to allow their own personal background, gender, prejudices or sympathies to sway their decision,“ he said.

“Call it empathy, call it prejudice or call it sympathy, but whatever it is, it’s not law,“ Sessions said. “In truth, it’s more akin to politics, and politics has no place in the courtroom.“

That was a reference to Obama’s declaration — made before he named Sotomayor — that he wanted a person of empathy on the high court.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat, made a spirited rebuttal later. “The empathy that President Obama saw in you has a constitutionally proper place” in the judiciary,“ he said.

Advertisement

 
View More: supreme court,sotomayor,latest news,hispanic,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Will on July 13, 2009 at 3:41 pm

Souter quit in part because he was disgusted that in 2000 his colleagues betrayed their own stated and practiced judicial philosophies to put Bush in office. Here’s the gang of current activist judges: Scalia who thinks he’s perfect and doesn’t have to recuse himself for anything; Thomas who is just plain weird; Alito and Roberts who are glued at the hip to corporate America. This wise woman, first named a judge by George Bush Sr. and strongly supported by Kenneth Starr, looks like heaps of improvement to me.

Flag Comment Posted by hlaford on July 13, 2009 at 3:19 pm

“Sotomayor pledges impartial justice if confirmed”  I wonder…  Impartial justice to or for whom?

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on July 13, 2009 at 2:27 pm

she has been reversed several times by a higher court.

Out of her 380 opinions written as an appeals court judge, she was reversed 3 times by the Supreme Court.  Only 5 of her opinions were reviewed by the Supremes and her 60% reversal rate is less than the average appellate judge (75%).

I don’t think she’s a racist and that line of attack won’t go very far IMO.  I’m far more concerned about her deference to the prosecution and law enforcment.  Her record on property rights isn’t great either.

Flag Comment Posted by Fred on July 13, 2009 at 1:10 pm

this is another great example of liberal hipocracy at its worst. This woman is a racist, a biggot, a sexist and a lousy judge…she has been reversed several times by a higher court. Maybe this is another example of Obama’s change…If you are White and you make a negative comment, YOU ARE DONE!! However, if you are a “minority” and/or a liberal, you can talk all kinds of garbage and disregard the law, and the rest of the liberals love it. Obama’s “change” in this case is putting an unqualified racist on the supreme court…the more the “change” the worse it gets!

Flag Comment Posted by ramfan79 on July 13, 2009 at 12:40 pm

I have to second that, 123456.  Her ruling on the New Haven firefighters case strikes me as even more disturbingly glaring than the ‘wise latina’ comments. 

Additionally, every news piece about this confirmation has painted the picture that it’s exclusively Republicans that have brought these factors up regarding her qualifications. 

How in the world can anyone in these vetting and confirmation processes, regardless of party affiliation, be so carefree of what would seem to be red flags in this situation?

Flag Comment Posted by 123456 on July 13, 2009 at 12:13 pm

This should be a huge eye opener for America.  It just goes to prove that our country only views white people as racist. Her remarks about a wise latina…were somehow taken with a grain of salt.  However, if a WHITE female in her position would have made the same remark all he1l would have broken loose and you can guarantee she would not be in the position this woman was.  It’s disgraceful to see how our country runs.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement