Responsible hunting with hounds benefits everyone

» 5 Comments | Post a Comment

Hunting with hounds is as old as Virginia. Our state dog is the American Foxhound. Twenty-five Virginia county boards of supervisors have passed resolutions supporting hunting with dogs.

Today this tradition is under attack by forces unconcerned with facts. Instead they resort to accusing hunters of inhumane treatment of their animals and the game they hunt. They repeat urban legends about undernourished and abandoned hounds, ignoring the truth about hunting and its benefits to the community and its contribution to keeping the natural order balanced.

Hunting with hounds accounts for approximately 65 percent of all deer hunting east of U.S. Route 29, the east of the Blue Ridge demarcation where using dogs for deer hunting is legal. Dog-based hunting adds about $250 million annually to Virginia's economy.

Many convenience stores in rural Virginia could not survive without the income from members of local hunt clubs that use hounds. Much of the rural open space that Virginians enjoy would not exist if hunters did not lease that land and provide owners with income, resource management, and, in many cases, maintenance of their interior roads.

Public safety is another benefit of Virginia's hunting-with-hounds tradition. Nationally, more than 200 people die annually in automobile crashes with wildlife, mostly deer, and many more people are injured. In 2006, 44,000 insurance damage claims were paid, averaging $2,800 each, and it is estimated that many more crashes were not reported. Without hunting, losses in property and life would rise tremendously. Virginia's black bear population has dramatically increased, and these larger animals present more danger.

Unmanaged wildlife populations devastate farms and suburban landscapes and lead to diseases -- deer ticks spread Lyme's; foxes and raccoons spread rabies. Hunting with hounds is the most effective way to control these populations -- and when hounds are used, wounded game is less likely to escape. Also, hunters provide thousands of pounds of meat to the needy through programs such as Hunters for the Hungry.

Rumors of dogs abandoned after hunting season are exaggerated. While there are a few unethical hunters, the overwhelming majority love their hounds and provide them excellent care. Hunters invest a lot of time and money in the care and training of their dogs. Most veterinarians observe that hounds used for hunting are far healthier than the average house pet that gets little exercise and is usually overweight.

Like any athlete who runs marathons, a hunting hound may look too thin to someone unfamiliar with the sport. Hounds are the marathon runners of the canine world. An unfit and overweight dog or person cannot complete a 5K run, much less a 26-mile marathon. And like some people, dogs run because they love it! This is just common sense to the majority of rural Virginians, and they wonder why anyone would consider limiting hunting with hounds.

Recently, the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries tried to convince the public that there has been a dramatic increase of trespassing by hound hunters. A Freedom of Information request and contact with local police officials proved that this is not true: Trespassing complaints are declining. Hunters now use expensive radio-tracking collars to help find their dogs. These collars also enable hunters to track dogs that cross private property so that it is not necessary to physically enter that property unless the chase is stopped.

Unfortunately, the animal-rights groups in this country are dedicated to ending all hunting as well as the breeding of animals used for food, medical research, and entertainment. The largest and most vocal of these groups is the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). It has a $100 million budget and shares many of the same goals as the Norfolk-based People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Even the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) has many animal-rights goals.

While HSUS and PETA talk animal protection, their Web sites reveal the truth if you read carefully. HSUS owns no shelters and provides no hands-on care of animals. It has used the money it raises to sue egg, cattle, and poultry producers, as well as horse breeders and research facilities. It uses financial contributions to lobby for an end to circuses, rodeos, and even zoos. The Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Affairs reported that in 2006, PETA killed 90.9 percent of the animals entrusted to it for rescue.

Wayne Pacelle, CEO of HSUS, revealed the radical nature of his organization over a decade ago when he said: "We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of domestic livestock produced through selective breeding -- one generation and out. We have no problems with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." (Animal People News, 5/1/1993)

Ethical hunters using hounds provide Virginians with wholesome family-oriented recreation and teach our youth about stewardship and citizenship. We should not allow animal rights fanatics to put an end to this important tradition.



H. Kirby Burch is vice chairman for governmental relations of the Virginia Hunting Dog Alliance. Contact him at .

Advertisement

 
View More: sunday commentary,h,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by NoRTR on January 14, 2010 at 9:01 pm

Self serving article, glosses over the abuse of landowner rights. Most state manages their Deer herds with hunting, not hounds.

Flag Comment Posted by Headhunter on December 07, 2009 at 7:18 pm

This article is a joke. A joke on private property owners who have their rights violated every year by unethical dog hunters & a joke on the true sportsmen of virginia who actually spend the time and effort it takes to actually hunt animals. Anyone can turn dogs out into the woods & shoot at deer as they cross public roads endangering the lives of innocent people. Anyone can turn dogs loose on your private property ruining all the effort real sportsmen put into managing the herd. Anyone can trespass on private property to retrieve a dog that was not welcome there in the first place. IT’s called the Right to Retreive Law. What a joke it is that dog hunters rights trample the rights of private property owners.

It’s long past overdue that the state of Virginia put the rights of private property owners ahead of of a gruop of people to lazy to actually hunt. The dog hunters claim its a tradition. Well many years ago it was tradition to shoot whatever you wanted regardless of game laws so by the same logic dog hunters feel they should be able to do whatever they want in the name of tradition. Due to the efforts or real sportsmen though the whitetailed deer population is doing great. Let’s put outdated methods like dog hunting out to pasture along with similiar methods like market hunting.

The large majority of real deer hunters in Virginia do not dog hunt deer & do not want any part of it but are forced to hunt that way or just give up hunting. Many of you who have tried to still hunt during the Virginia dog season know exactly what I’m talking about. Most of us true hunters enjoy our sport without imposing on others or trespassing on lands where we are not supposed to be but there is not a single day where the dog hunters are in the woods where they or their dogs do not impose on others of trespass on lands where they are not supposed to be. It’s time it stopped. The dog hunters say “My dogs can’t read”. Well neither can mine but I take pride in my dogs & do not let them roam freely or impose upon others. It’s called respect, something that the vast majority of dog hunters need to learn or they will face the end of a so-called tradition.

More & more people like me are getting fed up & I promise you this. If it turns into a fight of property rights VS. irresponsible dog runners the dog runners will loose.

Flag Comment Posted by Henry's Ghost on February 02, 2009 at 10:56 am

Excellent article Kirby, my bear hunting friend.

Flag Comment Posted by LBD on January 25, 2009 at 12:57 pm

Kudos for an article well written.  I was especially please to read that, through the Freedom of Information Act and sheriff/police records, that you were able to show that tresspassing claims were false.  The truth is on our side but it takes time to get it out and for people to accept it.  In California I fought against a mandatory spay/neuter bill (AB1634)that was strongly supported by both HSUS and Peta.  Through the Freedom of Information Act I was also able to show that bill proponants falsified shelter data.  This truth which was disclosed in a Senate Local Government Committee hearing put a crack in what became many cracks in the supporters efforts and the bill was eventually defeated after much struggle.

I know how much work was done to obtain and analyse the records.  Thanks.

Sadly,

Flag Comment Posted by jdowd on January 25, 2009 at 10:34 am

Hunting for meat and recreation are traditions that span the entire existence of humanity.  What is more disturbing to me than taking a team of dogs and using them for what they are naturally inclined to so is the attempt that people have to force “human” qualities on their animals.  Make no mistake, a dog would much rather be tracking game in the wild and sharing in the kill than sitting in a lap being talked too like they were a human child.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement