Finding Good Homes Remains a Challenge for Central Virginia

» 6 Comments | Post a Comment

Type_webhead_here Fourteen housing nonprofits will join together during the week of April 20-25 to host the Richmond region's second Affordable Housing Awareness Week. It is an interesting time to hold such an event, because many people believe that housing affordability is a far less pressing issue today than it was five years ago or even just nine months ago.

But that's not really the case. Granted, in the past year, house prices have fallen in the Richmond metropolitan area. Plus interest rates are at historic lows. So, yes, technically, home ownership is more affordable today than it was a year ago. And as a Realtor I will proclaim loud and long that now is a fantastic time to buy a house. It is.

Yet the opportunity for someone to own a home remains dependent on having good credit and a steady job that pays good wages. Thus, for many in our region, the challenge to locate and secure affordable housing is as difficult today as it has been in the past.

In the past nine years, house prices in metropolitan Richmond had a cumulative appreciation rate of 85.9 percent. To keep pace with rising house costs, workers would have had to have seen their incomes increase by more than 9 percent each year. I don't know too many people who have seen annual pay raises like that.

Simply put, the gap between housing costs and wages expanded at a fast and furious pace for the first part of this decade, and despite a recent softening in the housing market, the gap -- and the challenge of housing affordability for many -- remains considerable.

The inability to purchase a home is just one aspect of the multifaceted issue of affordable housing. Many within our community wish to rent rather than own housing -- hence the affordability challenge is to ensure an adequate supply of quality rental housing throughout the region.

The failure to develop and maintain adequate inventories of affordable rental and owner-occupied housing can have far-reaching consequences for the region's economy and quality of life.

Consider just one example: Thousands of young adults will graduate from our colleges and universities this spring, and they will seek to establish themselves both professionally and personally in Metro Richmond. We want these young people in our community. They are our future civic, corporate, religious, and governmental leaders. They bring energy, innovation, creativity, and enthusiasm to our community. Whether these young adults wish to rent or own, we must be ready, willing, and able to accommodate their housing needs. If we are not, we will lose them.

Of course, the spectrum of housing affordability is broader still than the issues of rental and owner-occupied housing. For many of our most vulnerable citizens, the issue of housing is as basic and as literal as a roof over their heads.

For the homeless among us (1,150 men, women, and children on any given day in Metro Richmond), affordable housing means access to temporary shelter. For others, it means the opportunity to transition from temporary shelter to permanent, supportive housing. For others, the challenge they face is the need to make modifications to their home, so they can age in place, or a disabled family member can continue to reside in the home.

Whether the need is for rental or owner-occupied housing, whether the age of the occupants is 22 or 82, and whether those facing the challenge earn far below the area median income, the challenge for us as a community is to ensure that there is a sufficient supply of a variety of affordable housing options in all the jurisdictions of the region.

Moreover, these housing options should be located in neighborhoods that boast safe streets, feed into excellent schools, are serviced by public transportation, and are located in close proximity to good-paying jobs. If we meet all these challenges, then we will have accomplished far more than providing affordable housing -- we will have created communities of opportunity; communities in which all of our residents have the opportunity to flourish and to contribute to the common good of our region.

So some may question the timing of an affordable housing week, but I cannot think of a better time. We all know people who have lost their jobs. Some of us know folks who are struggling to pay the rent or families facing foreclosure. Today, many of us have a far greater appreciation of what it means to call a place home than we did just a few short months ago.

Affordable Housing Awareness Week presents us with a chance to turn this empathy into action. During the week, there will be hundreds of opportunities to volunteer at affordable housing work sites in the region. Through your efforts, many of your fellow citizens will be able to secure the affordable housing they need.

Visit http://www.AffordableHousingRichmond.com to learn more and to volunteer. You will never have a better time to help us meet the challenge.



Jim Napier is president of Napier REALTORS ERA and chair of the Partnership for Housing Affordability. He can be reached at .

Advertisement

 
View More: sunday commentary,realtors,jim napier,affordable housing awareness week,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Scott Burger on April 21, 2009 at 3:45 pm

One solution for workforce housing that is probably being overlooked is neighborhood community development corporations. The Oregon Hill Home Improvement Council is the oldest neighborhood CDC in the City and also may have the distinction of being the last one that is still alive. Like most nonprofits, it is struggling in this economy. ohhic.org

Flag Comment Posted by Simmertime on April 21, 2009 at 3:40 pm

“"The goal in any economy is for the median household income to be able to afford the median priced new home. That’s Economics 101.“” Where is that a stated goal and by whom? Is it the goal of Chesterfield? Henrico? I have never heard of it. It may be the goal of affordable housing advocates, but not of society.

If a local entity wants to set limitations on lot or square footage, it can do so as a representative of the areas people. Perhaps there are zoning restrictions put in place to restrict who can move into an area. No one has an inherent right to a house, an affordable one, or area in which to live.

Flag Comment Posted by james on April 21, 2009 at 3:20 pm

Simmertime… I get 15 percent from looking at the current $268,000 median new home price and the $235,000 price the median household earning $69,000 can afford. OK, it’s actually about 13 percent. My bad. The goal in any economy is for the median household income to be able to afford the median priced new home. That’s Economics 101.

The goal Clinton pushed had nothing to do with home prices. He told banks to make loans to low-income people. He didn’t say anything about what the home had to cost. The banks, pressured by Clinton, came up with the crazy loan practices to meet that demand. The present housing mess has been caused by homes getting too expensive for even ordinary people to afford. They got too expensive because local governments decided they didn’t want homes that were small enough to rent out, so they regulated smaller homes out of the marketplace. As a result, the affordable housing Jim Napier writes about has become non-existent—unless you want a 30-year-old house. Try finding a 1500-square-foot, single-family detached home for $200,000 anywhere in this area that doesn’t look like a box. It doesn’t exist. And quite frankly, $200,000 is NOT affordable housing.

The marketplace is moving toward smaller homes. People don’t want McMansions anymore. Google “McMansion” and you’ll find numerous articles from outlets across America that say that very thing.

Flag Comment Posted by Simmertime on April 21, 2009 at 2:49 pm

James: “Builders have to be able to build homes that cost 15 percent less than what they can build today…“ Why? Who determines that this should be or is a goal of anyone? Isn’t this the same goal that Clinton & Congress pushed on all of us in the 90s that led to the present housing mess?

Why not let the marketplace and builders determine what to build? It is their company and the buyer’s money.

Flag Comment Posted by james on April 21, 2009 at 1:59 pm

According to just-released statistics from the National Association of Home Builders, the median new home price in the Richmond region is right at $268,000. With the region’s median household income at about $69,000, most people looking for a new home need a price of about $235,000 to afford one.

The median home price for all homes in Richmond is about $215,000, so if the median household wants someone else’s home, they can probably buy it today. That’s good, but it doesn’t add one thing to a local government’s property tax base and doesn’t create one job, which means local governments still are just as liable to raise the property taxes on that existing home and yours.

While there is no question that now is as good a time to buy an existing home as has existed in years, the same cannot be said for the new home market. Builders have to be able to build homes that cost 15 percent less than what they can build today, and the regulations that local governments have tacked on in the last few years don’t allow it. This overregulation, combined with obscene cash proffers that add more than $18,000 to the price of a new home in one county, and other add-ons forced on new homes by other counties, have to go away.

Builders create thousands of jobs on their own in Richmond every year. They are responsible for tens of thousands more jobs related to the industry. Until builders can build new homes again and put tens of thousands of people back to work, our local economy won’t recover.

Richmond has the third-highest median home price of any city in the South. THAT is why affordable housing is practically non-existent here. If that’s going to change and we’re going to see some affordable housing, counties better wake up and figure out that the McMansions they have forced builders to build for years are a thing of the past.

Flag Comment Posted by Simmertime on April 21, 2009 at 1:32 pm

NAPIER: “...opportunity for someone to own a home remains dependent on having good credit and a steady job that pays good wages. Thus…the challenge to secure affordable housing is as difficult…as…in the past.“  HMMM!
I am surprised that someone as well-educated and knowledgeable as a Napier would make such a naive statement.

The underlying reason for the housing collapse is unqualified people buying houses, period. The congressional push for affordable housing peaked in the 90s and we have to clean up the mess for lowering credit standards. Napier needs to get his head out of the sand. Not again!

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement