Letters to the Editor
There's No Comparing Kennedy and Palin
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
Your editorial, "Palinesque," quotes at length Caroline Kennedy's reply to The New York Times and then states, "Her eloquence resembles Sarah Palin's." What her reply resembles and reflects is someone not accustomed to thinking, critically or otherwise.Your comparison of Kennedy to Palin likewise reflects on your thinking, or lack thereof.
Palin's crowd appeal and political skills were, you know, evident. The two share a pretty face and little else.
Charles G. Cary. Richmond.
Dems Seek Division; GOP Tries to Heal It
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to shut down dissent in Congress, it is heartening to see the Republican leadership -- including, in a principal role, our own Rep. Eric Cantor -- engaging in talks with Barack Obama about his plans for the economy.Republicans are putting differences aside for the benefit of our country, and congressional Democrats are playing political games by changing rules that were put into place to encourage new ideas and innovation.
Pelosi plans on pushing through measures which would severly restrict the minority's ability to offer alternatives to proposed legislation. This is a shame. Additionally, she is trying to do away with term limits for committee chairmen.
These changes signal the fact that the Democrats are going to try and ram legislation through Congress without giving Republicans the opportunity to voice their concerns. I thought this was supposed to be the "most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history."
I'm proud that our congressman has more integrity and a better understanding of bipartisanship than Speaker Pelosi.
John B. LeRoy. Henrico.
Ozone Layer Depletion Affects Environment
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
I wish to contest Gary Allen's letter, "Is It Global Warming or Simply Sunspots?" regarding global warming as a great hoax. I would not consider myself a tree hugger and probably leave a larger carbon wake than most, so my views do not come from the far deep green side of the spectrum. But global warming is a measurable occurrence and simplifying the cause of these planetary climate changes to variability in sunspot activity is just not valid.The 11-year cycle of sunspot activity will be at its lowest next year and has not changed significantly over the past two cycles spanning 20 years, yet the yearly average temperature in the same period continues to rise. Allen's notion that changes in sunspot activity are solely responsible for global warming is not supported by the scientific community.
I certainly concur with his presentation of the fact that the sun's dynamic spectrum of energy bombarding our planet gives us our climate. But if his sunspot theory holds true, then the eroding, tax-burdened economy that he alludes to may be bolstered by a huge increase in snowmobile and snowblower sales in the coming year.
I am not a climatologist, but I understand the implications of ozone layer depletion and how burning fossil fuels may adversely affect the balance of the sun's energy being absorbed. Allen's recommendation was for America to wake up. Well, I am wide awake and when I cook, I know that removing the top from a boiling pot usually leads to water splashing where it doesn't belong.
Elliot Skorupa. Glen Allen.
What Caused Other Ice Ages to End?
Editor, Times-Dispatch:
The one question that my global-warming friends cannot cope with is: "What ended the Ice Age 10,000 years ago without man around to do it?" You know -- when the North American glacier came as far south as the Ohio River and extended to Cape Cod. Also, what ended the Little Ice Age from the 1500s to the 1800s without excess greenhouse gases?More than 650 dissenting international scientists now challenge manmade global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore -- hoaxster extraordinaire. A December 2008 U.S. Senate report includes more than 650 prestigious, worldwide scientists who disagree with the U.N.'s IPCC -- more than 12 times the number of U.N. scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007. But Gore refuses to debate any of them, saying that the science is settled. The hubris of these navel-gazing men is breathtaking. They enjoy a mammoth funding advantage over nonbelievers.
Now Europe is backing off on cap-and-trade. With 85 percent of our energy coming from fossil fuels, an energy tax with the U.S. economy in tatters poses personal suffering and destroys jobs, especially in the manufacturing sector.
With the latest talk about cooling, the innovative euphemism is "climate change." While man has no doubt made considerable carbon dioxide contributions, more likely than not it is due to the sun's phases and good old Mother Earth's cyclical changes -- after all, Mother does know best.
Bruce Woodruff. Midlothian.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Miller was a problem, but he served for just over 18 months. Stagflation became an issue in the early 1970s and got worse. Bottom line is Carter appointed Volcker. While my intention is not to dump it all on him, had Greenspan not kept rates so low for so long, the “irrational exuberance” of structured finance may have been held in check.
Carter was not a good President. George W is a disaster. Reagan set in motion the free market/deregulation hooey that the Presidents after him allowed to continue.
Your right, we didn’t need an Energy Department. Instead we should have started to phase in the real cost of oil at the pump instead of providing subsidies, tax breaks and having US taxpayers foot the bill for the military costs needed to access foreign oil.
kfw38c-Please explain how the numbers are misleading.
“A generation of stagflation” is misleading.
Nixon started the inflation ball rolling in 1971 with his wage and price controls but the stagflation mess was all Carter all the time.
His administration placed enormous restrictions on domestic oil production. In months the price of oil quadrupled. OPEC had a party and we were all standing in gas lines.
Inflation started at 5.5% in 1970 and
and stood at 13.3% in 1979.
What is misleading?
A small point but I did mention that Volcker was NOT Carter’s choice at all. But he was Reagan’s when he was reappointed by him in 1987.
Let us give Mr. Obama a little more time to show his measure.
I imagine that Mr. Bush will come in handy when things get sticky.
Remember the only president who couldn’t blame all his miseries on the previous administration was George Washington. And Barack Obama is no George Washington or Abraham Lincoln or Harry Truman. Maybe not even a George Bush.
Kfw38c: Good luck messing with Greta—you’re going to need it. :)
Greta,
Your comparison of Carter to Reagan is misleading. After almost a generation of stagflation, Carter picked Paul Volker to run the Fed. His raising of interst rates helped create a painful recession, but laid the ground work for lower rates and economic growth without inflation. Reagan helped fuel a party by enormous deficit spending and tax cuts alons with establishing the precedent of careless oversight of financial instituions.
I look forward to your post in about three months when you compare economic statistics between Bush and Obama and remind us how it was so much better under George!
Carter did indeed inherit a bad economy but he made it worse. Much worse.
Carter Int.21%
Inf.13.5%
Unemp.7%
Reagan Int.9%
Inf.4.1%
Unem.5.5%
Their “Misery Indexes” were 20.5% for Carter and 9.6% for Reagan.
Reagan is always listed as one of the countries best President’s.Carter never is. In fact on the official list he ranks as 11th worst.
Keynesian Economics-“Trade-off between inflation and unemployment. Colossal mistake.
“Limits to Growth Movement”
At the end of his term the budget was 12 times larger than the one that Nixon left.
His Fed Chairman G.William Miller is now viewed as the worst Fed chief ever.
He gets credit for Volcker but it took a contingent of Wall Street guys in a march on the White House to get Carter to agree to his nomination.
“Voluntary” wage and price controls.
He created the dollar gobbling Energy department that has yet to produce one drop of energy.
On his watch the Shah of Iran was toppled and the Mullahs ruled. The Soviet Union felt comfortable enough to invade Afghanistan and al-Qaida
was born.
He never met a tyrant or dictator that he didn’t like.
And when the layers are peeled back from the Camp David Accords the credit has to go to Anwar Sadat. Carter paid Israel and Egypt off. Dollars for peace. No saintly treaty. Just business as usual.
He was a truely terrible president but he has redeemed himelf with the spectacular charity work he has done around the world. In Africa in particular. As long as he does not play the useful idiot role politically the world is lucky to have him.
Carter inherited the bills from the Vietnam war and a dollar in free fall. Carter actually saved the dollar by raising interest rates. It was painful, but it worked and it saved the life savings of Americans. The interest rates remained high under Reagan. You could not get a fixed rate mortgage, the a recession marked nearly his entire presidency. Reaganomics, give to rich and the rest will benefit from the crumbs that fall off their tables, is laughable and thoroughly discredited. When Carter left office, the US was the greatest net creditor nation in the world. Reagan just spent, spent spent, and when he left office, the US was the greatest net debtor nation in the world. Republicans believe in the free lunch. Borrow and spend.
Really SCGuy? What planet are you from? I’ll admit that Nixon left a mess, but Carter hardly cleaned it up. He actually made it worse with double digit inflation and unemployment. In fact his ineptitude led the media to coin a new term, the “misery index”. After Reagan took office he lowered the maximum income tax rate from around 70% to 28% and got the US economy moving again. I’ll admit that to confiscatory liberals any attempt at letting people keep the money they earn is corrupt, but to freedom loving individuals like myself, it is the essence of liberty. Or maybe you’re just mad because he showed the fallacy of communist ideals.
Reagan turned out to be the most corrupt president in US history. Carter had to clean up Nixon’s mess, and it’s funny how history has vindicated him. He now ranks among the best. Biden’s weakness is that he’s given hundreds of interviews and talks freely and candidly, which gives the dishonest cons an opportunity to quote him out of context and exploit his gaffs.
Don’t know how you libs can still go after Palin after all of the moronic things Biden said. That is unless you are afraid that she’s gonna be the next Ronald Reagan to Obama’s Jimmy Carter.
Palin’s a public figure. She did that, not me, and she’s fair game. She also divided VA up into two parts, the evil part up north and the good part in the south. Unfortunately for Palin, the “evil” part outnumbers the “good” part, and the Republicans got trounced. For someone who couldn’t even answer Katie Couric’s gift questions, like how will you be an asset to the McCain administration, a politician’s dream question, you blame the press instead of the person. When will Republicans start taking personal responsibility for all the stupid things they do?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement