Correspondent of the Day

» 1 Comment | Post a Comment

Editor, Times-Dispatch: Whenever one changes a process, a government, or one's clothes, there are two possible outcomes: Things could get better, or things could get worse.

I say this in relation to the proposed changes to the health care system in the U.S. Many favor changing our current system, blaming the incredible, seemingly out-of-control rise in health care costs. I, for one, don't mind the rising cost of health care.

My dad is 66 years old and has two artificial hips. His first was replaced when he was 59. His second was at 64. Prior to each operation, he was limited to walking only from the door to the car while using a cane. He was not far from a wheelchair when he finally underwent the surgeries. Both surgeries were incredible successes and after each, he was in less pain two days after the surgery then he was the day before the surgery.

The surgeries were made possible by a health insurance policy, a hospital willing to take the operation and the risk, and the company that developed the hip. All of these people and groups came together to replace Dad's hips because there was a promise of profit for each involved. Profit has a bad connotation in many circles but here profit motivated many to do a great thing and give my dad his mobility back.

Artificial hips as common medical devices are no more than 30 years old. What was the solution for arthritic, life-limiting hips before then? A wheelchair and a handicapped future.

The cost of both operations totaled over $40,000. The cost of a shiny new wheelchair is $150. Let's keep a health care system that allows Americans to benefit from today's medical breakthroughs instead of a system that hands out wheelchairs. Roger Galbraith. Glen Allen.

Advertisement

 
View More: correspondent of the day,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Blackbird on May 26, 2009 at 10:58 am

I am glad you father is progressing.  I am glad your father had health insurance.  I am glad the companies made a profit.  Profit is ok, but what about those NOT able to afford insurance?
Is it the wheelchair for them?
And why does it cost $40,000?
Where does that figure come from, how do they figure it out?  Is it from REAL costs or is it from ADMINISTRATIVE costs? Like a CEO who gets $10 million plus bonus and can’t remember anything (reference HealthSouth CEO Scrushy?) 
These are the things that irk me.  Maybe I just need a little education, but maybe we all do. Maybe just because we have system , doesn’t mean it’s the best system. Don’t we deserve the BEST system and don’t we have the responsibilty to ask tough questions about profit and coverage, better yet don’t we deserve the BEST answers to these questions?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement