Letters to the Editor

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

Act Fast on Warming, Before Planet Cools

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

The Op/Ed column by Preston Bryant and Noah Sachs, "On Climate, Obama Must Hurry," with its cheerleading for action on the various ways the alleged anthropogenic-global-warming consensus can be utilized to increase government's size, seems to suggest concern they might not be able to inflict this on us before the large and rapidly growing number of real climate scientists who are challenging the climate-change theory reach a point where they can no longer be censored.

That seems to be getting much closer. A recent Senate Subcommittee on Environment and Public Works report shows that more than 650 real climate scientists from around the world are now openly challenging the U.N.-Al Gore "consensus."

Mother Nature, by not cooperating with the consensus crowd, might be causing further angst. Earth's temperatures have not increased for the past eight years. Predicted rises in ocean levels have not happened, and are reported to have dropped. Arctic ice cover is increasing, as are some glaciers. And the ongoing lack of solar activity presages (gasp!) cooling.

All this might well contribute to the consensus enthusiasts' concern that their perceived problem might disappear before they can fix it.

E.G. Martin. Williamsburg.

Try to Spare Arts From Draconian Cuts

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

Given the current economic climate, when members of the General Assembly debate the budget proposals of Gov. Tim Kaine, we urge them to protect arts funding from suffering a reduction that is disproportionate to those applied to other areas of the state government.

In Virginia, arts and culture are a billion-dollar industry -- employing 20,000 people, generating hundreds of millions of dollars in economic activity, and drawing both national and international tourists.

People are already taking more "staycations," as they look to avoid airfares and hotel expenses. A strong arts sector encourages people to stay local and attend cultural events close to home, boosting the respective local economies.

A strong arts and culture presence can also assist with economic development.

Though arts offerings are not the main reason for a company to relocate in Virginia, combined with other factors such as taxes, schools, and workforce potential, a strong arts presence can give the commonwealth an edge over another state.

When support for the arts is reduced, it is not the frills that are being cut. Rather, the reduction is undercutting an industry that is a cornerstone of tourism, economic development, and the revitalization of many downtowns.

When support for the arts increases, the result is an increase in tax revenues, jobs, and a creativity-based economy.

The arts are part of the solution to the challenges that the Commonwealth of Virginia and the country face today. The arts bring inspiration, meaning, and enjoyment to our lives -- they are instrumental in strengthening our communities educationally, socially, and economically.

Please support Gov. Kaine's budget for arts funding and encourage Virginia legislators to do the same.

Kirk Spitzer, Chairman,

The Cultural Arts Center at Glen Allen Board of Directors. Richmond.

Fat Tax Would Feed The Lean Budget

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

Rather than double the cigarette tax (haven't we penalized smokers enough?), why not levy an annual tax on fat? A fat tax, if you will. How about $10 a year for every pound that a person is overweight? Two-thirds of Americans are overweight.

I propose that residents of the commonwealth weigh in every year at DMV offices and the Body Mass Index be used to determine how much each person is overweight. We might exempt children and senior citizens (which thankfully includes me).

Not only would this be a terrific way for the commonwealth to raise money, we might create a healthier citizenry in the process.

If people don't want to pay the fat tax, all they have to do is eat less, which will also save them money.

John Clark. Richmond.

A Univeral System Can't Be Exclusive, Too

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

I am writing in response to Tim Fite's letter regarding my earlier letter.

Fite argues that public schools are unique institutions because they are both publicly funded and publicly operated. He claims that most government programs are publicly funded, but privately provided like Medicare or food stamps -- although he seems to forget about the police, fire, and military.

Fite wants a Medicare or food stamp model of funding for our schools. The government provides funding for programs, but citizens get to pick where the service is provided among private providers.

Fite forgets that doctors and grocery stores are not exclusive. No one stands at the door and says we don't want your business, or we won't treat you because your cancer is too advanced.

Public K-12 schools were established to provide exactly what Fite claims to support: a universal, basic education for all. Fite wants taxpayer support for children to attend private schools, but still wants the government schools -- that he complains are a failing, nationalized monopoly -- to operate.

Public schools serve gifted children, those with significant learning problems, and everyone in between. Public schools must exist if we are to have universal basic education, and we should not be paying parents to leave a system we established to provide this service.

You cannot have an educational system that is both exclusive and universal.

In Virginia, we do have a post-secondary system that is much like the model that Fite supports. Parents can apply to public or private colleges, and there is taxpayer support available for both. However, no one is required to attend and many don't.

One need only look at these programs to see what public K-12 schools might look like if they were able to exclude children as the private schools do. Many of the colleges and universities considered the best in the state are public institutions.

Greg Muzik. Richmond.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Isaiah S. on December 29, 2008 at 2:50 pm

Greg Muzik and his commenting supporter both seem to believe that the difference between schools is nothing but the quality of the students. And there certainly is a difference between kids. But Muzik and his supporter continue with this problem: they are opposed to letting people make their own decisions. They support economic coercion to punish independent education. School choice proponents want nothing more than the expansion of liberty. Why all the fuss?

Flag Comment Posted by greta on December 28, 2008 at 2:39 pm

E.G.Martin-I want to echo your sentiments. The latest global warming conference in Poland has proved beyond a doubt that the measures adopted by the Europeans in the original Kyoto Protocol have been a dismal failure. They proved to be hideously expensive and unworkable.And the cap-and-trade scheme introduced in 2005 has been even more disastrous.
They are not only NOT reducing their current emissions they are increasing their output at an even faster rate.
Unfortunately the Europeans are back-pedaling for purely economic reasons. Not because they have finally recognized that creating an ideology pegged on carbon dioxide is stupidity on a global scale.
The IPCC has based its “scientific consensus” regarding global warming/climate change on 22 computer generated models that it OPENLY admits cannot be validated.
The late astronomer Carl Sagan said that,“extradionary claims require extradionary evidence.“
The IPCC report, which I have read, is filled with words like “hindcasting” and “predictions” and various degrees of “likely” “very likely” “not at all likely"etc.
There have been a series of serious gaffes recently at the GISS and NASA thanks to the global warming guru Dr. Hansen. He and his ring master in this global circus are beginning to see the wheels come off this money wagon.
We had better hope that this new administration catches on before the next meeting in Copenhagen and the Europeans have figured out a way to guilt the liberals into paying for this smoke and mirrors “crisis.“
And hopefully to put a fine point on things-The CO2 always FOLLOWS the warming…..

Flag Comment Posted by dog1 on December 28, 2008 at 9:43 am

Greg Muze has a 30 year plus background in education with many years as a Richmond principal. His views are accurate and thoughtful.

On the other hand. Tim Fite’s suggestions are ill conceived and poorly thought out. Fite sounds like a city resident who likes the lower assessed real estate values which result largely from our poor local schools. But apparently he wants it both ways because he somehow thinks he is magically entitled to great schools too. 

The social ills and family breakdown which under-girds the failures of the Richmond City schools took generations to come about. It will take generations to turn around Richmond’s schools, unless Fite is going to undertake rebuilding families in areas like Whitcomb Court, Mosby Court, and Fairfield Court, and return caring dads to all those single parent homes. Me thinks Fite would be better off in Chesterfield or Henrico.

Fite’s reasoning seems mostly dreamlike and immature, whereas Muze is right on the money. Among professionals, Fite’s approach is called magical thinking and reflects that of someone who needs more to do. Spare us from the naivete.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement