Jobless rate tops 10 percent for first time since 1983

Jobless rate tops 10 percent for first time since 1983

STEVEN SENNE/AP

Job seekers examined listings yesterday at an employment center in Providence, R.I.

» 52 Comments | Post a Comment

WASHINGTON — The unemployment rate has hit double digits for the first time since 1983 — and is likely to go higher.

The 10.2 percent jobless rate for October shows how weak the economy remains even though it is growing. The rising jobless rate could threaten the recovery if it saps consumers’ confidence and makes them more cautious about spending as the holiday season approaches.

The October unemployment rate — reflecting nearly 16 million jobless people — jumped from 9.8 percent in September, the Labor Department said Friday. The job losses occurred across most industries, from manufacturing and construction to retail and financial.

Economists say the unemployment rate could surpass 10.5 percent next year because employers are reluctant to hire.

President Barack Obama called the new jobs report another illustration of why much more work is needed to spur business creation and consumer spending. Noting legislation he’s signing to provide additional unemployment benefits for laid-off workers, Obama said, “I will not rest until all Americans who want work can find work.“

The government’s monthly unemployment report is based on two surveys, one of households, one of companies’ payrolls. The household survey showed that about 558,000 more people were unemployed last month than in September, raising the total to 15.7 million. The company survey, however, showed only a third as many job losses — 190,000.

The disparity can be explained by the fact that the company survey doesn’t count people who are self-employed and undercounts employees of small businesses. That’s why some analysts, like Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial, say last month’s household survey could be an ominous sign for the economy.

One struggling small business, Miller and Smith Inc., a home builder in McLean, Va., has trimmed its work force to about 97 from 350 at the height of the housing market in 2005. The company has been hurt by a slowdown in building and surging health care costs.

Miller and Smith faced a 44 percent increase in the cost of health insurance over the past year that it managed to reduce to 23 percent.

“You can have ... one person get in a traffic accident on the weekend, and it completely blows your claim experience out of the water,“ Human Resources Director Selina Burke said.

Troubles for small businesses could have a disproportionate effect on the economy, because they account for about 60 percent of the nation’s jobs. They tend to rely on credit cards and home equity lines to maintain their cash flow. Banks have tightened credit in many of these areas.

The 10.2 percent unemployment rate does not include people without jobs who have stopped looking for work or those who have settled for part-time jobs. If you counted those people, the unemployment rate would be 17.5 percent, the highest on records dating from 1994.

“It’s not a good report,“ said Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist for New York-based investment firm Miller Tabak & Co. “What we’re seeing is a validation of the idea that a jobless recovery is perfectly on track.“

That’s hurting people like Jose Betancourt, 57, who goes to a Miami-area career center twice a week to take computer education classes. Betancourt has been out of work since July, when he was laid off from his supermarket maintenance job. He lives on about $600 a month in unemployment benefits, barely enough for the rent for his efficiency apartment, food and utilities.

Betancourt has trouble believing the recession is over. In his neighborhood, he sees other jobless people and empty stores.

“It’s as if they just gave the economy a nice coat of varnish to make everyone feel better,“ he said. “I’m in a state of anxiety, and I see it all around Miami.“

Last week, the government said the economy grew at a 3.5 percent annual rate in the July-September quarter, the strongest signal yet that the worst recession since the Great Depression is over. But that growth isn’t fast enough to turn the job market around.

“You need explosive growth to take the unemployment rate down,“ Greenhaus said in an interview Thursday.

The economy soared by nearly 8 percent in 1983 after a steep recession, lowering the jobless rate by 2.5 percentage points that year. But the economy is unlikely to improve that fast this time, as consumers remain cautious and tight credit hinders businesses. In fact, many analysts expect economic growth to moderate early next year, as the impact of government stimulus programs to boost home and car buying fades.

Despite the rise in joblessness, the stock markets were little changed Friday afternoon. The bleak jobs report reassured investors that the Federal Reserve won’t raise record-low interest rates any time soon. The prospect of continued low rates tends to lead investors to shift money into stocks.

High unemployment is likely to become a political liability for Obama and Democrats in Congress. Most economists expect the jobless rate will remain above 9 percent through next November, when congressional elections are held. When unemployment topped 10 percent in the fall of 1982, President Ronald Reagan’s Republican Party lost 26 seats in the House.

Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill traded blame over the unemployment figures.

Rep. Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said the economy would have been much worse had congressional Democrats not approved Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package in February.

Republicans countered that Obama’s focus on increased spending was making things worse.

“More debt, more spending ... clearly has not worked — particularly in a time of double-digit unemployment,“ said Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

One sign of how hard it still is to find a job: The number of Americans who have been out of work for six months or longer rose from 5.4 million to 5.6 million, a record. They account for 35.6 percent of the unemployed population, matching a record set last month.

Congress sought to address the impact of long-term unemployment this week by approving legislation extending jobless benefits for the fourth time since the recession began. The bill would add 14 to 20 extra weeks of aid and is intended to prevent almost 2 million recipients from running out of unemployment insurance during the upcoming holiday season.

October was the 22nd straight month the U.S. economy has shed jobs, the longest on records dating back 70 years.

The report showed job losses remain widespread across many industries. Manufacturers eliminated a net total of 61,000 jobs. Construction shed 62,000 jobs. The economy has lost a net total of 7.3 million jobs since the recession began in December 2007.

The average work week was unchanged at 33 hours, a disappointment because employers are expected to add more hours for current workers before they begin hiring new ones.

There were some bright spots in the report.

Education and health care added 45,000 jobs. Professional and business services companies added 18,000 jobs. The beleaguered auto industry added 4,600 jobs, its first gain since July. And temporary employment grew by 33,700 jobs, its third straight month of gains after steep losses earlier this year. That’s a positive sign because employers are likely to add temporary workers before hiring permanent ones.

While the unemployment rate hasn’t yet topped the post-World War II high of 10.8 percent set in December 1982, many experts say this recession is worse.

“This may be the toughest employment situation we’ve seen in the postwar era,“ Mark Gertler, an economics professor at New York University, said.

___

Associated Press Writers Jim Kuhnhenn and Anne Flaherty in Washington, and AP Business Writers Emily Fredrix in Milwaukee, Christopher Leonard in St. Louis, Adrian Sainz in Miami, Andrew Vanacore in New York and Tom Murphy in Indianapolis contributed to this report.

Advertisement

 
View More: unemployment,latest news,jobless rate,economy,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by grizzman on November 07, 2009 at 4:45 pm

You never let up DandyAndy, I’ll give you that.

So you actually expected a President, in his first month in office, during the worst recession in over a generation, to completely end the recession in one month? And not only end it, but have some serious growth happening as well? I think you are going to be sincerely disappointed in life with those kinds of expectations.

Also, I’d like you to provide me the quote from Obama where he said he would do that.

If incompetence is the dow gaining 3500 points in the last 8 months, economists declaring the recession over and the US getting closer and closer every month this year towards no jobs lost, then serve me up a heaping plate of it.

Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on November 07, 2009 at 3:34 pm

Right, Dandy… just like Jim Gilmore was only limited by the opposition of the Democrats. Keep making it up as you go along.

Flag Comment Posted by DandyAndy on November 07, 2009 at 1:55 pm

The difference, 9Step, is that Bush actually did something about all the problems he inherited.  Unlike Obama, who seems more focused on picking some childish fight with Fox News.

grizzman, <i>“So let me ask this, in a recession inherited from a previous administration, Obama was supposed to go from 700,000 jobs lost a month to job gains in his first month in office”

Well, isn’t that what he said he was going to do?  Didn’t he lead everyone to believe that he was going to ride into town and clean up the mess that Bush caused?
Seriously, how much longer are you cheerleaders going to excuse his incompetence?

Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on November 07, 2009 at 12:24 pm

“ I never heard the Bush administration once blame 9/11 or any other problems such as the housing bubble on the former admin or that he “inherited” the problem. “-mrcs


Wow, goes to show the power of the will to deceive oneself, or how quickly we forget our own words.

I guess it depends on what “is” “is” or whether someone “blames” someone when they “blame” them.

P.S. not grizz, either

Flag Comment Posted by mrcs on November 07, 2009 at 12:09 pm

grizz,

those quotes are not blaming anybody. They are stating facts. recessions are definitive periods of an economy that can be classified. Obama inherited a recession. So did Bush. Bush ended his term on a recession. No one disputes this. I am concerned that the far left are still blaming the former administration as they push to move farther and farther from capitalism. there is no doubt Bush is to blame mainly for starting this mess, but at some point we have to be pissed off at the policies of this so called agent of “Change”.

Bush had blinders on his entire last 4 years as he only focused on the wars in Iraq and Afghansastan. Obama has to be held accountable for his limiting policies in helping this economy rebound. the most robust economies in the history of the world were not the ones that were most regulated or had the most government involved in them. No, they were the ones with the least amount of government and letted the market of free enterprise and economic darwinism weed out the weak and proliferate the strong.

Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on November 07, 2009 at 11:29 am

mrcs- I guess you weren’t paying attention, then.

How about Condoleezza Rice?

“Nobody organized this country or the international community to fight the terrorist threat that was upon us until 9/11. … We were not left a comprehensive strategy to fight al-Qaida. For instance, big pieces were missing, like an approach to Pakistan that might work, because without Pakistan you weren’t going to get Afghanistan.“

I know, but she doesn’t come right out and say it. How about Bush himself?

“They looked at our response after the hostage crisis in Iran, the bombings of the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the first World Trade Center attack, the killing of American soldiers in Somalia, the destruction of two U.S. embassies in Africa, and the attack on the USS Cole. They concluded that free societies lacked the courage and character to defend themselves against a determined enemy.“

There you go. Of course, that was the war in Iraq. He also blamed Clinton for the recession that he “inherited”, all the way through his Presidency.

““When I took office, our economy was beginning a recession.” — Bush, 8/7/02

“The president inherited a Clinton recession and turned it into the early stages of Bush prosperity.” — Secretary of Commerce Don Evans, 9/2/04

“In terms of the economy, look, I inherited a recession, I am ending on a recession.” — Bush, 1/12/09


No need to go ‘round not knowing stuff.

Flag Comment Posted by mrcs on November 07, 2009 at 11:11 am

Grizz, I never heard the Bush administration once blame 9/11 or any other problems such as the housing bubble on the former admin or that he “inherited” the problem. You seem fixated on the fact that your man Obama has “inherited” the problem.

Grizz, we will take our guns, religion and freedoms. You can have the “change”

Flag Comment Posted by Anonymous on November 07, 2009 at 10:30 am

Maybe we need to have Joe Biden explain all of this to us. He is so credible and has a way with words.

Flag Comment Posted by grizzman on November 06, 2009 at 9:19 pm

Again the comedy on here is PRICELESS. PLEASE keep it coming. It’s all doom and gloom for you guys…And all Obama’s fault. Never an ounce of good news. All of you must be a BLAST to hang out with.

I especially like the Titanic reference, priceless, and totally off base. But that doesn’t matter to you guys, does it? As long as it’s doom and gloom, and you can blame it on Obama, not matter how much of a stretch.

So let me ask this, in a recession inherited from a previous administration, Obama was supposed to go from 700,000 jobs lost a month to job gains in his first month in office, or he’s a complete failure? I’m reading these posts correctly, right? No steady easing up on the job losses, that’s a bad thing, and makes us worse off now that 10 months ago? Is that how it works?

And GodFather, answer me this question: When anything went wrong during the Bush administration (or even today), how often did you blame Clinton for it? Judging by your “stop blaming Bush tirades on here, I’m guessing the number is zero, am I correct? And be honest.

And here’s a little something to chew on. I’m guessing this isn’t from “the liberal media,“ since I’ve seen some of you post links from this site before.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jul/09/eric-cantor/Cantor-and-other-republicans-say-obama-promised-s/

Flag Comment Posted by mikeyt on November 06, 2009 at 8:20 pm

Good work spending that $787 billion to keep unemployment at 8% or less, Barry.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement