VCU expert says ‘car czar’ key to auto bailout

VCU expert says ‘car czar’ key to auto bailout

JOE MAHONEY/TIMES-DISPATCH

Heritage Chevrolet salesman Craig Woodlief (left) talked with Julia Reynolds and her son Joshua of Chester yesterday.  Reynolds was on the lot looking for a car for her son.

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

Economist George Hoffer says money isn't the most important part of the bailout package that Congress and the White House have proposed for the U.S. automobile industry.

The $15 billion in loans for two automakers would be a fraction of what the industry needs to survive, while the power of a proposed "car czar" is the most critical piece of the package, said Hoffer, a professor at Virginia Commonwealth University and an expert in transportation issues who has studied and written about the auto industry since the 1960s.

"The legislation has to give the czar and whatever [oversight] committee is created the power of a bankruptcy judge, or it is worthless," Hoffer said yesterday.

The legislation's proposed overseer has to be able to cut through labor agreements, state automobile-dealer franchise laws, debt structure and other obstacles to the industry's ability to restructure itself and become economically viable, Hoffer said. But the money will go only so far in an industry that's hemorrhaging cash.

"The cash flow is so negative -- that $15 billion seems like so much, but it's just a pittance of what they need," he said.

The money would go to General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC but not Ford Motor Co., which said it doesn't need the aid now. However, one local Ford dealer said the loans are essential to prevent one company's collapse from taking down suppliers and other automakers.

"We're really calling it a bridge loan," said Ronald Kody, president of Richmond Ford, which straddles the Richmond and Henrico County line. "They're really not asking for anything for nothing."

Virginia car dealers aren't sure how they feel about the details, but they're adamant that the industry can't survive without loans to weather an economic storm that stems primarily from paralyzed credit markets.

"I don't think our economy can take another blow," said H. Carter Myers, a Petersburg native who owns 12 dealer franchises in five locations in the Richmond and Charlottesville areas. "This is going to hit Main Street and dealers all over the country. It's going to hit the supply industry."

Myers, who said he personally has lobbied U.S. Sen. John W. Warner, R-Va., to support the proposed legislation, estimates the automobile industry supports more than 55,000 jobs in Virginia.

As for the creation of a "car czar," he said, "I guess it depends on who it is and what power he has."

Hoffer argues that the country needs a bailout with the same kind of solution it applied in the 1970s when several large railroads went into bankruptcy and a restructured industry emerged because of independent government oversight.

"General Motors and the automobile industry is just as important to the American economy as the railroads were" in 1970, he said.

Jimmy Whitten, co-owner of Whitten Brothers Inc., agrees. "If they don't bail it out, they're gone," said Whitten, who owns dealerships in Midlothian, Petersburg and Ashland. "When they go away, it's just a matter of which supplier goes" first.

Federal oversight is preferable to filing for bankruptcy protection, which dealers say would cast a pall over consumers who are considering buying a vehicle.

"How much does it do to destroy their confidence, regardless of how good the product is?" said Richard Carter, general manager at Haynes Jeep Chrysler in Henrico.

Dealers are frustrated by the public perception of their industry and the strings attached to the proposed bailout, especially compared with the huge subsidies given to banks and financial institutions, many of them healthy, with little oversight.

"I think they're going the opposite direction from what they did with the bailout for the financial institutions," Carter said.

That frustration is magnified by the role the financial institutions played in drying up the credit that the auto industry needs for people to buy cars.

Whitten says his sales are down 50 percent and that half of the people who walk into his dealerships would buy a vehicle if they could get a loan. "It's not that there isn't demand out there," he said.


Contact Michael Martz at (804) 649-6964 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: transportation,george hoffer,editor,detroit,congress,big three,bailout,automobile,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by SCGuy on December 10, 2008 at 10:23 pm

Just give the big three the same money that the taxpayers give Toyota in Alabama.  The whole thing stinks of union busting.

Flag Comment Posted by Sdunn on December 10, 2008 at 7:09 pm

This is just tiny, compared to the trillion dollar bailouts previously. Yet, somehow it merits the most attention…simply insane.

Flag Comment Posted by wheresmybailout on December 10, 2008 at 6:11 pm

Another piece of pork with this bill. This bill will also bail out transit agencies. The bus and rail systems could be on the hook for billions of dollars in payments because exotic deals they entered into with investors—which have since been declared unlawful tax shelters. Also included in the bill is an unrelated pay-raise for federal judges.

I wonder what else is in there that I have not found yet.

Flag Comment Posted by Sdunn on December 10, 2008 at 4:35 pm

Channelling…the spirits are have somehow connected to my very psyche…and they are wondering how people without money will finance their auto purchace…What’s that Cassandra?...I don’t understand what you’re saying…it just sounds like hysterical laughter…

Flag Comment Posted by qhgirl on December 10, 2008 at 12:14 pm

I understand the ripple effect, but why is the auto industry any more “special” than any other?  Why not Circuit City?  Why not Land America? Why not Philip Morris? Why not the call center workers? Besides.. I find it completely laughable that the US Government is going to somehow be “incharge”  of the recovery effort.  If you look up overspending and poor management in the dictionary.. I bet there would be a picture of some government hack..lol.  Really, there are already tools for people and business to use when they are in distress.  It is called BANKRUPTCY.  Why won’t they do that?  Well the dems are so in bed with the unions that they can’t support the automakers doing anything that would hurt their membership!  The union contracts would be out the window in a bankruptcy court.  If you think I am being unfair.. why do foreign auto companies build in America? Why can they do it for less money?  Unions don’t hold them over a barrel, that’s why.  The unions have made the US automakers completely uncompetitive.  Too bad.. they will take these billions and be back for more next year (or sooner).

Flag Comment Posted by bs48 on December 10, 2008 at 11:10 am

I would ask those who oppose some type of help for the domestic auto manufacturers to be aware of all of the consequences if the Detroit 3 fail. The economic ripple is deeper than you might be aware of. With a decrease in manufacturers there will be fewer vehicles available and supply and demand being what it is, consumers will have to pay more than they do today. And there is also those who service the automotive business. After 40+ years, with the same company, as a vendor to local automobile dealers as a result of the current turmoil in the car business I lost my job. That translates into purchasing fewer goods which is going to negatively affect even more people. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. I only ask that before you go online and share yours you consider all the ramifications.

Flag Comment Posted by geek49203 on December 10, 2008 at 10:42 am

Yeah, love that “czar” idea.  It worked so well for, say, that war on drugs, ya know?

I’m one of a million auto state refugees that have made their way here.  I’ve worked in the auto companies, and got to know people from top executives to the newest hourly person.  I cover motor sports events for publications, and get that insight as well. 

To say that either management or labor are to blame is a mistake.  The issue is with a “stuck relationship” with the two that goes back to the 1930’s that has brought them to this point.  While an outside arbitrator might be helpful, I remain doubtful that anyone from the government has a clue. 

Furthermore, to have the Congressmen who had oversight of the banking industry (including Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae) say that the head of GM needs to be removed for not seeing this crisis coming smacks of the height of hypocrisy.  Let’s remove those responsible in Congress if we need to remove those who were supposed to see it coming….

Flag Comment Posted by andym on December 10, 2008 at 8:10 am

The big 3 American auto companies must find a way to reduce costs. Nearly every car that rolls off the assembly line is sold at a loss. That will not change as long as the union refuses to budge. The union would rather see their jobs disappear that try to solve the problem. How can the companies continue to pay union workers $80K+ per year and expect to stay in business? It can’t be done.

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on December 10, 2008 at 7:49 am

Hold it. If the ‘car czar’ is supposed to have the power and authority of a bankruptcy judge to fix things, then that means a bankruptcy judge already has that kind of power and authority. Why create a position of ‘car czar’ to do what the courts can already do under bankruptcy law? More smoke and mirrors - and wasted money.

Flag Comment Posted by DarnYankee on December 10, 2008 at 5:58 am

This whole notion of a bailout is wrong on so many levels.  Look at what is being proposed. An executive branch official with the power of a judge? That public official having to the power to issue orders to private companies?  Companies taking taxpayer money and making campaign contributions to elected officials? According to some polls, 2/3 of American voters are opposed to this scheme, yet the politicians in Washington are ignoring the will of the people. No one and no organization in America is too big or too important to fail. The bank bailout was wrong.  This is wrong. Who’s next in line to take taxpayer money?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement