First Market Bank, Union Bank and Trust to combine operations
First Market Bank and Union Bank and Trust will combine operations with a new name -- rather than operate as separate banks -- when their parent companies merge.
The initial merger deal between First Market and Union Bankshares Corp. called for First Market to operate as a separate subsidiary under the combined publicly traded firm to be called Union First Market Bankshares Corp.
But the two companies recently amended their merger agreement to call for consolidating operations of the two community banks into one with a new name and a common brand.
The name and brand for the combined entity will be announced later this year, the companies said.
"The joint decision to combine our two banks -- rather than operate them separately -- is based on a desire to provide customers with one of the most convenient community banking networks in Virginia," said G. William Beale, president and chief executive of Union Bankshares.
"Union Bank and Trust and First Market Bank, once combined, will provide strong financial and operational efficiencies that we believe will benefit both our shareholders and our customers," said Beale, who will remain CEO of the holding company and become CEO of the combined banks.
The merger deal should be completed during the fourth quarter, subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals.
The consolidation of the two subsidiaries is expected to occur during the first quarter of 2010.
When completed, the combined entity will have 97 branches in Virginia with more than $4 billion in assets -- creating the largest community bank in Virginia. The new holding company will have its headquarters in Richmond.
First Market, a privately held company whose owners include Ukrop's Super Markets Inc., members of the Ukrop family and Markel Corp., operates 39 branches, mostly inside Ukrop's stores and mostly in the Richmond area.
Union Bankshares' current subsidiaries are Union Bank and Trust, which operates 42 locations; Northern Neck State Bank and Rappahannock National Bank. -- Gregory J. Gilligan
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I think it is an awesome deal for everyone involved! Good for the Ukrops, First Market, Union Bank and Trust, employees and customers alike!
I agree with the HDQ in Richmond, what a bonus!
First Market and Ukrops Grocery Stores are both 1st rate organizations so you know that this new entity will be awesome!
Anyone that doesn’t like this/approve of this can only be somehow jealous of the Ukrops folks…LOL….
An acquisition isn’t necessarily a bad thing. And, I agree that if the Ukrop’s or other owners of either entity make money on this “merger”, good for them!! Isn’t making money on good investments what we strive for in a capitalist society?? I whole-heartedly agree that this combined bank will be a strong, prosperous bank, and I love that it will be headquartered in Richmond.
Logerhead, if you’ve kept up with these articles, you would have seen that branch consolidation is likely to occur, especially for geographic concerns. And, if you look at the listings of branch locations, you’ll notice that there is some geographic overlap.
Each bank does not have a presence in the others territory, so I doubt any branches will close as a result of the merger.
No TARP funds were used in the merger. It is a trade in stock and other cash assets.
Who cares how much money the Ukrops get, isn’t that why people start their own businesses? To make money?
It is a merger, if you read the details of who is to sit on the board of directors, you will see an even split between Union and First Market. If it was an acquisition, why does it matter?
I disagree. For Union to close shop on their name that is over 100 years old, this really is a merger. There is always one bank larger than the other, but this will end up being a very strong community bank made up of some solid bankers. Union is safe and strong and First Market is service oriented and progressive. Don’t confuse your frustrations of “big banks” with the community banks trying to restructure and support the areas they serve. Give them a chance after the merger before you make opinions of them.
Can we now stop referring to this as a “merger” instead of the acquisition that it truly is?!?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement