Business lender might not survive bankruptcy reorganization

» 3 Comments | Post a Comment

A Chapter 11 filing usually means the end of the road for financial companies since they rely so heavily on customer trust. CIT Group Inc. is hoping that its case will be different.

The commercial lender's trip through bankruptcy reorganization may well be speedy given that it's already reached agreements with creditors on restructuring its debt. But the real test will come from CIT customers, who could decide to take their business elsewhere.

"Their image is tarnished right now," said Len Blum, a managing partner at investment bank Westwood Capital. "They have an uphill climb because they are only worth the value of the portfolio."

Just as a bank would fail if all of its depositors tried to get money out at the same time, CIT wouldn't be able to survive if too many of its customers close their accounts. Some have already been pulling their business in recent months as CIT struggled for survival, but it's still too early to know how many will remain.

CIT is one of the nation's biggest lenders to small and mid-sized businesses, providing financing to a large array, including retailers, energy companies, a small movie studio, and operators of Dunkin' Donuts stores.

One factor playing in CIT's favor is that tight lending conditions would make it tough for customers who wanted to leave. CIT also provides specialized types of financing services that relatively few competitors offer.

Sarah Paxton, co-owner of LaDifférence home-furnishings store in downtown Richmond, said she deals with several vendors that work with CIT.

Instead of paying them directly, she pays CIT, which acts as a bank for the vendor.

"Basically, I've paid CIT, but CIT, because of their bankruptcy protection, does not have to pay my vendor. My vendor could be out the money," she said.

She said the vendors now have to collect from CIT.

CIT, one of the largest lenders to the retail industry, serves 2,000 vendors that supply merchandise to 300,000 stores, according to Craig Shearman, spokesman at the National Retail Federation. Analysts say 60 percent of the apparel industry depends on CIT for financing, so other lenders taking up all the slack would pose a big financial strain.

"Everyone is pulling for CIT to get by," said Michael Cipriani, senior vice president of Rosenthal & Rosenthal, a rival of CIT. "It would be devastating to see something like this fail."

Even so, analysts say it's still anyone's guess whether CIT can pull it off.

CIT filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Sunday in New York after teetering on the brink of collapse for months. The company ran into trouble as rising costs to finance its operations outpaced the money it took in from providing loans.

The pre-arranged bankruptcy plan with creditors will reduce its debt by about $10 billion.

The government gave CIT $2.3 billion last fall as part of a rescue of other banks and lenders, though there is now little hope of that money being recovered.

CIT's stockholders also would be wiped out under the reorganization plan.



Staff writer Louis Llovio and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement

 
View More: la difference,cit,business economy,business companies,bankruptcy,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on November 03, 2009 at 11:48 am

Then we wouldn’t have to have any bankruptcy laws.  Stockholders would wake up one morning to learn that their company had closed overnight and all the employees had been fired.

Why would there be no bankruptcy laws?  That’s where failed companies go!

Buying stock is risky business, any shareholder knows that.  There’s always a chance that your investment can go to zero.

Flag Comment Posted by Anon on November 03, 2009 at 6:36 am

jogger,

Then we wouldn’t have to have any bankruptcy laws.  Stockholders would wake up one morning to learn that their company had closed overnight and all the employees had been fired.

That would put a whole new strain on business-vendor relationships.  All businesses would demand cash up front before signing any deal.

Flag Comment Posted by jogger on November 03, 2009 at 5:15 am

Indicates CIT had/has some bad management.  $2.3 Billion of taxpayer bailout money lost.  CIT along with other institutions who were poorly managed should have been allowed to fail and disappear from the business world.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement