Fed officials say unemployment could stay high for years

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

WASHINGTON -- Unemployment likely will remain high for the next several years because the economic recovery won't be strong enough to spur robust hiring, Federal Reserve officials warned today.

The cautionary note struck by the presidents of regional Fed banks in San Francisco and Atlanta were the first public remarks of Fed officials since the government reported last week that the nation's jobless rate bolted to 10.2 percent in October. It marked only the second time in the post-World War II period that the rate surpassed 10 percent.

In separate speeches, Janet Yellen, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and Dennis Lockhart, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, warned that rising unemployment could crimp consumers, restraining the recovery. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of economic activity.

"With such a slow rebound, unemployment could well stay high for several years to come," Yellen said. "In other words, our recovery is likely to feel like something well short of good times."

Yellen envisions the shape of the recovery kind of like an "L" with a gradual upward tilt of the base.

Lockhart said "very slow net job gains" may occur "sometime next year."

Troubles in the commercial real estate market and the plight of small businesses also will weigh on the recovery, they said.

Small businesses -- which held up reasonably well in the 2001 recession -- have been clobbered by the downturn, accounting for about 45 percent of net job losses through the end of 2008, Lockhart said. During the last two economic recoveries, small businesses contributed about one-third of net job growth. Lockhart said he doubted that would be the case this time.

That's because many small businesses rely on smaller banks for credit. But troubled commercial real estate loans are concentrated at those banks, hobbling the flow of credit. Lockhart said he is "particularly concerned" about that linkage.

-- The Associated Press

Advertisement

 
View More: latest news,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by grizzman on November 10, 2009 at 8:17 pm

How does a story that rates as “barely true” confirm what you said?

How about this: Please post me the quote where Obama promised he would keep unemployment around 8% if the stimulus passed.

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on November 10, 2009 at 2:34 pm

grizzman: I’m puzzled by your citation of the link. It confirms what I said. Also, who said I thought Bush did any better? Why do people insist upon reading ‘Bush!‘ into every post by someone else? Look, it’s Obama’s baby now and intoning ‘Bush!‘ like some kind of mantra to silence Obama’s critics won’t work any more. Obama has promised miracles he couldn’t deliver on and there is no one else in the White House to point the finger at.

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on November 10, 2009 at 1:42 pm

J-Reb: That’s cold comfort for people who will be out of work indefinitely. The Fed may be telling us we have embarked on the brave New World of the European economies with chronic high unemployment.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on November 10, 2009 at 1:23 pm

All of you need to learn the difference between a leading indicator and a lagging indicator.  It’s Econ 101 material.

Here’s an example to get you started: the stock market (up over 60% now) is a leading indicator.  Unemployment (climbing since Feb 2008) is a lagging indicator.  Now start learning.  You have nowhere to go but UP!

Flag Comment Posted by grizzman on November 10, 2009 at 1:21 pm

YES!

The doom and gloomers are BACK!

Man, I long for those glory days of December 2008, before Obama became Pres when we were losing 600,000+ jobs a month and the Dow was tanking. Things were so much better then.

And Dave, not quite:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jul/09/eric-cantor/Cantor-and-other-republicans-say-obama-promised-s/

Flag Comment Posted by GodFather on November 10, 2009 at 1:10 pm

YOu cant heal a patient by bleeding them to death.  That notion went out with the dark ages - except in DC.

Flag Comment Posted by TruthMachine on November 10, 2009 at 1:08 pm

What??? I thought Obama had “created or saved” thousands of jobs! How can this be?

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on November 10, 2009 at 1:01 pm

My favorite chart on the stimulus that isn’t:

http://michaelscomments.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/stimulus-vs-unemployment-june-dots.gif

Flag Comment Posted by Amazing on November 10, 2009 at 12:00 pm

$700+ billion Stimulous Package, and this is the “hope & change” we get? -Amazing

Flag Comment Posted by Dave on November 10, 2009 at 11:12 am

....but, but Obama promised his stimulus plan would keep unemployment around 8% before ‘fixing it’. Is this the ‘fix’? If it is, then why would we want to increase the tax burden on anybody with cap & tax or the health care bill? There’s a lot of ‘coding’ in this article. They keep bringing up commerical real estate as an anchor. Why? What are they not telling us? What about the condition of credit card debt? Most importantly of all, why will no one address the enormous national debt and the perpetual drag it will be on the economy for, at best, the next 2 generations?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement