U.S. jobless rate falls to 10%
AP PHOTO
Job seekers wait in line to speak to potential employers at a job fair in Philadelphia, Tuesday.
The national unemployment rate edged down in November, and by more than economists had thought, but the number of people losing jobs last month still outran the number of those finding work.
The rate fell to 10 percent in November from 10.2 percent in October, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported yesterday. Unemployment stood at 6.8 percent a year ago, as the recession started biting.
About 375,000 more Americans joined the unemployment lines, while 227,000 found jobs, the bureau reported a day after President Barack Obama hosted a jobs summit to focus on how to get the unemployed back to work.
"That's the smallest net decline since 2007," said Kent Engelke, chief economic strategist and managing director at Capitol Securities Management, a Richmond-based securities firm.
"I think we're going to start seeing hiring picking up in January," he said.
The key, he said, are two numbers often lost in the flood of monthly data on job markets.
The number of people working at temporary-help companies rose by 52,000 in November, to 1.8 million.
And the average work week in the nation's factories edged up another six minutes, to 40 hours, 24 minutes. That means overtime is on the rise and could be headed to the point where employers believe it makes more sense to hire staff than keep paying time-and-a-half.
But the data also show plenty of people still are hurting.
The number of people who are so discouraged that they've stopped looking for work rose by another 53,000 to 861,000, the bureau reported. The number who have been out of work for six months or more rose by 293,000, to 5.9 million.
"Today's employment report was the most hopeful sign yet that the stabilization of financial markets and the recovery in economic growth may be leading to improvements in the labor market," said Christina Romer, chairwoman of the president's Council of Economic Advisors.
But she said the large number of Americans still out of work underscores the need for the kind of job-creating programs for which Obama called at Thursday's forum.
Though the unemployment rate dropped for the first time since July, last month's layoffs brought the total of jobs lost since the recession began to 7.2 million.
The net number of job losses last month, 11,000, was far below October's 597,000 and was lower than almost all economists had predicted. A Bloomberg News Service survey of 82 economists showed the lowest forecast was for a net job loss of 30,000, while the average was a 125,000 job loss.
"Bottom line, the data is a clear positive, but doesn't square with other info," said Peter Boockvar, a market strategist with the New York investment bank Miller Tabak & Co.
"But let's enjoy it for today."
Contact David Ress at (804) 649-6051 or dress @timesdispatch.com.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
“he real Non-farm Payroll Employment Report”
Yeah, farmwork isn’t real work. You know, compared to sitting around at some office job and carping anonymously about Obama while waiting for your teabags to come in.
oneuser,
A month ago, the RTD made a big announcement about how many seasoned reporters were being transferred to the Business Desk. It wasn’t clear whether they were full-time, or just stringers.
This was news YESTERDAY. Does the paper only have one reporter? Who wants to read old news?
The “those who have given up looking for work” category is just like the “or created” category in that it cannot be verified and is just a made up number. I think the true unemployment rate is almost double the claimed rate. There are the under employed working for minumum wage that are qualified for far better work, the “dropped out of the workforce” group and the “didn’t start looking because there is nothing out there” group. I learned many years ago that “liars figure and figures lie”.
We have some structural issues in America. I think we need to get back to making things, or we’ll all be working part-time for Wal-Mart before long.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-warren/america-without-a-middle_b_377829.html
I question the new “those who have given up looking for work” category, a category that didn’t exist until this year, and one that is useful in padding statistics to suit one’s needs. If the numbers continue to drop, trust me, you’ll see that category fade into oblivion because it will no longer be necessary.
I challenge all “raw data.“ I refuse to read one thing and accept it as fact. I like to see two, three or even four sides of an issue…not just blindly accept raw data. That’s just stupid, and I’m not a sheep following along.
Anyone who thinks a 0.2% drop in the unemployment is good news has rocks in their heads. This statistic has been manipulated to MAKE you think it’s dropped, when in reality the REAL unempl rate is closer to 17%.
This is all to make BO look good, a change we can believe in.
M&P .45,
Excellent analysis.
The size of the civilian labor force keeps shrinking. Which was probably the worst thing in the report.
There was alot of mixed messages in that labor data. A couple good things, and a couple things that don’t make sense.
The number of full time workers took a huge hit, but was replaced with an almost equal rise in temporary work. That might be wrapped in the “seasonal adjustment” magic they work with the numbers.
It looks like alot of folks are still moving into “Not In Labor Force” and not being counted anymore.
Every month 200,000 potential warm bodies enter the potential labor pool. Now if you have between 65%-70% labor participation rate, that means the economy needs to create 125,000 to 150,000 jobs per month… to break even.
So once things really turn, you need to see 300,000+ jobs created to start making a dent in the 7-8 million or so people who are looking for work.
I love that you can choose to believe or not believe raw data. If you debbie downers are betting a week’s pay on these figures being manipulated then obviously you are gainfully employed so I don’t get why you are so eager to “believe” unemployment is worse than 10%. Hey guess what, unemployment in Virginia is 6%, would you “believe” that?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement