Commercial real estate market in Richmond is ailing

Commercial real estate market in Richmond is ailing

ALEXA WELCH EDLUND/TIMES-DISPATCH

The chain that owns the StudioPLUS hotel at 10060 W. Broad Street filed for bankruptcy.

» 20 Comments | Post a Comment

MARKETBEAT:

List of troubled properties
Industrial
Office
Retail

The commercial real estate market in the Richmond area is ailing and likely to get worse, much like the rest of the country.

Twenty-three properties here -- ranging from hotels to mixed-used developments, apartments and shopping centers -- are in financial distress, according to Real Capital Analytics, a commercial real estate research and consulting firm based in New York.

A year ago, only five properties locally were troubled assets.

A surge of foreclosures of commercial properties in the Richmond area and nationwide is expected in the next year, as borrowers face loans coming due and can find no source of refinancing.

"It's a universal problem," said Stevens N. Gentil, chairman of Grubb & Ellis/Harrison & Bates, a commercial real estate firm in Richmond.

"There's a high probability that any property acquired, financed and developed since 2003 is over-financed," he said.

In most cases, property values have dropped precipitously and borrowers owe more than their properties are worth.

What's more, the commercial real estate problem isn't limited to new developments. Many stores, offices, hotels and town-house projects built 30 years ago were refinanced -- and over-leveraged -- during the boom.

"It's not like in the early 1990s when Richmond was overbuilt and we slugged it out over three or four years," Gentil said. Builders stopped constructing then and supply eventually caught up with demand.

"This time around, the national economy is worse and we have some bigger, more fundamental issues," he said. "The market came back quickly in the '90s. Let's hope that is the situation now."

Others are less optimistic.

"I think it will get worse before it gets better," said Jessica Ruderman, a senior analyst with Real Capital Analytics. "Banks are still not lending money. Buyers and lenders don't agree on prices."

C. Lee Warfield III, executive vice president at Thalhimer/Cushman & Wakefield real estate brokerage in Richmond, said he expects to see similar deterioration in the Richmond area.

Eight percent of the commercial properties here are in distress, while 17 percent are in financial trouble nationally, according to Real Capital Analytics. By comparison, 24 percent of properties in Las Vegas are in danger of foreclosure.

"We're no different than the rest of the country, although we haven't seen the extreme ups and downs in values like in Florida and other parts of the country," Warfield said.

Here's some of what is happening now:

  • Steven Kent Hotel in Petersburg is in foreclosure and scheduled to be auctioned this month.

  • Hampton Farms, a 38-acre residential project off Hull Street Road in western Chesterfield County, was repossessed by the lender in August. The developer built roads and installed water and sewer lines but couldn't drum up interest from home builders.

  • The Sheraton Richmond West hotel in Henrico has a receiver who was appointed until the lender and borrower can come to terms.

"We are definitely open for business," said Tico Bevier with ARL Richmond Management, the receiver. "The property has not been foreclosed," he said, declining to elaborate. "We look forward to continuing our service."

  • Midlothian Town Center, a mixed-use project on 35 acres off Winterfield Road in Chesterfield, never got off the ground. An executive at James Doran Co., the project's Charleston, S.C.-based developer, declined to comment.

  • One of the largest mixed-use projects for the area, Magnolia Green on nearly 1,900 acres in Chesterfield County, was repossessed in May.

. . .

The commercial real estate market operated much like the residential market, which brought the economy down.

Interest rates were low; credit was easy and little if any equity was required to get a loan. Loans on commercial properties were pooled together into securities -- commercial mortgage-backed securities -- and sold to investors, much like residential loans.

The mortgage-backed securities market has dried up totally since peaking in October 2007. Banks are requiring more equity than they were two years ago -- typically at least 30 percent -- and even then, few are lending on commercial projects, real estate experts say.

Unlike most residential loans, which are paid over 30 years, commercial loans typically are five-, sevenor 10-year notes -- and those notes are coming due.

By the end of 2012, $153 billion of commercial loans are coming due and nearly $100 billion will have trouble refinancing, according to Deutsche Bank.

"One constantly recurring fear is that another round of losses will result from the collapse of commercial real estate," according to a Wells Fargo Securities report this week subtitled "The Next Shoe to Drop?"

"The sharpest job losses since the Great Depression have sent demand for commercial properties reeling. Rising vacancy rates are cutting into rental income and making it much more difficult to sell properties."

Values of commercial properties nationwide have dropped 30 percent from two years ago, and sales have plunged 85 percent in the same time period -- to the lowest volume since Real Capital Analytics began tracking the data in 2001.

The Richmond area is showing similar declines, according the research company.

"As of now, most [troubled assets] are not actually being taken back by the lenders, because that would force them to mark down the value of the loan on their books," said Ben Thypin, a market analyst for Real Capital Analytics.

"Most lenders are doing what is being referred to as 'extend and pretend' in which they try to work it out with borrower by modifying and extending the loan or finding a new buyer."



Contact Carol Hazard at (804) 775-8023 or .

Staff writer John Reid Blackwell contributed to this report.

Advertisement

 
View More: troubled assets,commercial real estate,business economy,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Donk on September 05, 2009 at 5:52 pm

You’re not telling us they plowed up all this farmland and woods, put ugly buildings up, and now they can’t pay for them. Ha,ha.

Flag Comment Posted by DickTracy on September 05, 2009 at 5:37 pm

Its good to see that you can read
(hanoverharry)—Or can you write? You
have added nothing constructive to the discussion. Kant’s comments are quite
right on. And I have obereved the Richmond scene for many decades. If you have such interest in the future of Richmond’s real estate might you change your name to richmondharry—where the tomatoes are not quite as red—but nor are the necks. Its always amazing to see the acid wrought in this real estate discussion—Just keep the
Hanover connection—it will be a lot more profitable—trust me.

Flag Comment Posted by HanoverHarry on September 05, 2009 at 4:11 pm

To Dick Tracy…Jeez, you lost me after “Those are good points, Kant…“

If you’re gonna be so long winded, get our own blog. Leave the RTD site to cohesive comments. Nobody cares about so much ranting.

Flag Comment Posted by Scott Burger on September 05, 2009 at 3:04 pm

Right now, even VCU’s situation is looking dire (and really puts Trani’s expansionist policies in negative perspective). An August 27th article in the Commonwealth Times (sorry, can’t find online link) reveals just how much VCU is relying on recent “stimulus funds” currently and says course cutting will be likely.

I have been conversing a bit with Silvestri of the Times Dispatch about his STIR initiative and what that may or may not mean for the area (yes, plugging for alternative energy). I have invited him and members of STIR to the Peak Oil talk also.

Silvestri on STIR:

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/opinion/commentary/article/ED-TAS30_20090828-201205/289027/

Details and link to Peak Oil event:

September 9, 2009
Time: 7:00 pm

Program: Peak Oil—How to Cope
Speakers: Tom Whipple&Alex;Zeigler

Location: Science Musuem of Virginia - Discovery Room, 2500 West Broad Street Richmond Virginia.

http://www.virginia.sierraclub.org/foj/events/sep/sep_9_09_160.html

Flag Comment Posted by DickTracy on September 05, 2009 at 12:36 pm

Those are good points Kant. I made similar comments over the weeks particularly about downtown Richmond
although this RTD article here takes in the general area.Even so, Richmond per se was not the big real estate bang people thought it was going to be—Indeed, I made reference as well to
people losing big dollars in the Richmond gold-rush and a lot of empty condos and buildings (was also critical of the proposed Shockoe Stadium which was a blatant real estate ploy and had nothing to do with baseball which would have been a
major disaster for naïve Richmond.)

Of course I got criticized by those who don’t understand,. They assume the new state office buildings, the expansion
of VCU and the improvements to some infrastructural things plus the episodic folk festival and bike race along with some new residents equate to some big boom—which it is does not. There is a leveling off phase to residential and business demographics for any town like Richmond that does not already have a core downtown model like Baltimore, New York or San Francisco. Unless that culture exists en masse then any rehabilitation efforts should be for state and municipal space and infrastructure (which is good)—but anyone thinking this translates into a great bonanza for business or residential real estate is in for a shock—particularly in our economy,.

The fancy shops in Shockoe would not be there if not for the fancy hotels nearby—trust me they wouldn’t. Parts of downtown are kind of like where the fan re merged—And that is interesting
and it is fun—but again it does not translate into some bigger boom. Its fine and great for those who have emerged there to cater to the limits of that market—but any larger expecations should be scaled down.

Flag Comment Posted by loggerhead on September 05, 2009 at 11:02 am

Don’t forget that banks are beginning to pull the loans, because there is no longer the collateral to back the loan.  The depreciation of the project necessitates additional financial commitment from the signer and cosigners.  If they can not raise the addition capital, to bridge the commitment gap, bye bye loan.

More commercial properties are on the horizon to foreclose.  Not just recent ones, but major ones…like the our biggest malls on the east coast.  Their value has fallen and the loan still has debt to be serviced.  More debt than the value of the property.

Flag Comment Posted by Anon on September 05, 2009 at 9:26 am

Kant,

Sounds like you are applying for Carol’s job.  She’s pretty well entrenched, though.  Don’t think you have a chance.

Good analysis.

Flag Comment Posted by Anon on September 05, 2009 at 9:18 am

mikeyt,

Interesting stuff about the relationship between bankers and developers.

If the big banks got bailed out by the Fed and the small banks by the FDIC, what does this say about the regionals?

Rhetorical question.  Don’t think anyone knows the answer.

Flag Comment Posted by Kant Seay on September 05, 2009 at 9:13 am

19th century America gave us ‘Boomtowns’ that became “Ghost towns” when their raison d’etre disappeared.

Much of our modern commercial development has a lot in common with those earlier communities built on unsustainable foundations.

We have, over the past quarter century, built our economy on a vast credit ponzi scheme where we built malls ( using foreign labor) to sell goods made in Asia to Americans who hocked their homes and future earnings to shop. Office parks sprang up to accomodate vast armies of workers to service to make the loans and service the debt instruments this fake economy generated.

Now the chickens are coming home to roost and we have little industry left to actually produce the stuff we need and provide the jobs that generate the income necessary to buy it.

Flag Comment Posted by mikeyt on September 05, 2009 at 9:02 am

Interested Read… it wasn’t speculative building. Most of those developers had had their loans for a year or more before they built. But the bank gave them an ultimatum—build it or the bank will pull the loan. A developer never wants a bank to pull a loan because it if does the banking relationship between the two is over. So they built and hoped the market wouldn’t tank.

Much of the building you see today in the commercial market, and to a lesser extent in the residential market, comes from the fact that the bank has threatened the note. I firmly believe it’s an absolute fact that Obama wants to take control of the banks and will nationalize the banks if they don’t keep a certain level of liquidity. That’s why the banks are recalling so many loans they’ve made and are failing to make loans they should be making to keep their liquidity.

Every Friday when we see one or two more banks going into receivership, even if they only have a couple hundred million in assets, I keep waiting for the accompanying article, “Obama thinking of nationalizing banks.“ Only two of the 84 banks that have gone under this year have had assets over $1 billion, which is a small bank. But I keep waiting for Obama to make the move. You know he wants to do it to help redistribute wealth. It’s just a matter of time unless we start seeing more jobs created, which will generate more revenue and get our economy going again.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement