State has yet to get help for rest areas
Published: July 18, 2009
The planned closure of nearly half of Virginia's highway rest areas next week seems likely to move ahead, despite state officials' pleas to Congress to help keep them open.
The state plans to close 18 rest areas Tuesday because of a shortfall in transportation revenue, but Gov. Timothy M. Kaine and other officials have asked Congress for a waiver or exemption from a federal law barring commercial activities at interstate rest stops. That would enable the state to have private businesses operate them.
That request was met with resistance in Congress yesterday, as an attempt by Rep. Frank R. Wolf, R-10th, to push through an amendment to a federal transportation bill failed in committee on a 26-32 vote.
"The goal was to begin the process to let the state commercialize rest stops," said Dan Scandling, a spokesman for Wolf. "The whole effort here was keeping them open for safety reasons."
The closures are expected to save about $9 million, as state transportation officials grapple with a recession-driven revenue shortfall that led the Commonwealth Transportation Board to cut Virginia's six-year transportation program by $2.6 billion.
Wolf sent a letter to Kaine yesterday urging him to reverse the decision to close the rest areas and find another way to save $9 million. Wolf wrote that he had made a "good faith" effort to help the state keep the facilities open.
"I am strongly opposed to the decision to close rest stops in the state," Wolf wrote. "It is a terrible idea. We are putting hundreds of thousands of motorists at risk."
A spokesman for Sen. Mark R. Warner, D-Va., said the state's congressional delegation was studying possible options for obtaining an exemption from the federal law. But even if that is possible, it likely wouldn't come in time to prevent the closure of the rest areas, state officials and congressional aides said.
"As of right now, the rest areas are scheduled to close next Tuesday, and that has not changed," Kaine spokesman Gordon Hickey said yesterday.
Jeff Caldwell, a spokesman for the state Department of Transportation, said the 18 affected rest areas would be closed to motorists and barricaded Tuesday. Crews will then start a 30to 60-day process of removing furniture and shutting off utilities. A welcome center in Manassas also is scheduled to close in September; 23 other rest areas around the state will remain open.
"We have got to close these on the schedule that we came up with in order to meet financial targets," Caldwell said. But state transportation officials would welcome the option of having private businesses keep the rest areas functioning, he said.
"We are supportive of it," he said. "And as a long-term solution to this issue, it is certainly a viable possibility, but the law will have to change. Then we would have to move through the privatization and contracting process."
Martha M. Meade, a spokeswoman for the motor club AAA Mid-Atlantic, said the group also sent a letter to Kaine yesterday expressing concerns about closing the rest areas. She said the group would support privatizing them as a way to keep them open, but "even if that worked, certainly they could not be privatized by next week."
"We understand the budget crisis," Meade said. "However, we just wanted to ask that [state] officials take one last look to make sure there were absolutely no other options."
With so many rest areas scheduled to close, Meade urged motorists to plan their trips carefully so they can find safe places to stop.
"We do encourage people to take the time to stop and take the time to plan," she said. "Just because the rest areas are closing does not mean we don't have responsibility to keep ourselves and others safe."
Contact John Reid Blackwell at (804) 775-8123 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I have traveled 64W and 81N the rest stops are needed. 85 rest areas are definitely because some of the exit businesses are not able to handle emergency pit stops. Some of the little convenience stores attached to gas stations have NO rest room facilities. I hope none of the people who are making all the negative comments about money never have to encounter a tractor trailer truck where the driver is tired and had no where to pull over. Other states have private businesses running rest stops and provide food full service and fast food service as well as tourist information and service stations. This seems to provide revenue to the states they are in.
Closing the rest stops causes people to get laid off which the state is going to have to pay for anyway in the form of unemployment benefits, Medicaid, food stamps and probably in some cases Financial Assistance as well as causing more people to lose housing and other things a salary provides.
A toll is a great idea, but not at the rest area because then people would skip by and go somewhere free. A toll on the roadway would be better because then they could fund rest areas and road maintenance.
I drive up and down the interstates all the time, and although I certainly hate seeing the rest stops go, lets be honest—within an exit of each one of these closing are plenty of commercial entities ready (REALLY READY) to have some additional customers stop in that might not otherwise. Let’s look at the positive! We can barely keep our roads going today, and if 9M is being spent by the government that could be spent more effectively, then let it be. The “status quo” isn’t always the best option.
This is unfair to the private sector which is expected to handle the people who can’t use a rest stop. Just to keep them clean will require more employees. Several companies have said they will keep the restrooms locked and a customer will have to ask for the keys - one by one. It is unfair and unsafe for truckers not to be able to take a break. At least keep the lots open so truckers can rest. This is a huge mistake for public safety.
I am glad that congress had the ability to stop this bill. The taxpayers have already paid for the buildings, parking lot and bathrooms. Why should a private business be located on public bathroom property. Put up an unmanned toll gate at the entrance to collect toll and leave them opened. Or the governor could cut spending elsewhere. It is his choice, right?
Does anybody know how many additional burgers and fries a vendor would have to sell just to cover the $500,000 overhead of keeping a single rest stop open? Would they have to offer this greasy fast food 24/7 or only during selected times? By this action, would the state be encouraging travelers to shove additional fat into their arteries?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement