High-speed rail line would include Ashland, Staples Mill

High-speed rail line would include Ashland, Staples Mill

DEAN HOFFMEYER/TIMES-DISPATCH

Ashland and Hanover County officials opposed an eastern route for proposed high-speed rail service through Richmond.

» 26 Comments | Post a Comment

The train still is going to run through the Ashland and Staples Mill stations.

The Federal Railroad Administration has dropped consideration of an eastern route for proposed high-speed rail service through Richmond that would have bypassed Ashland and Amtrak's main station on Staples Mill Road in Henrico County.

"We concluded that the eastern route didn't make a whole lot of sense," Charles M. Badger, the director of the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, said yesterday.

"It was more expensive and had more environmental impacts. There are some wetlands that the eastern route would have taken," he said. "And it had the trains tie back in north of Ashland, so it would eliminate service to Ashland and even Staples Mill."

During the past year, the state rail agency conducted an environmental study to select the most feasible route between Richmond's Main Street Station and Doswell in northern Hanover County for the U.S. southeast high-speed rail service to Washington.

The eastern route between Main Street Station and Doswell followed the Buckingham Branch rail line, which runs generally east of Interstate 95. The western route follows the CSX rail line, to the west of I-95.

Ashland and Hanover officials opposed the eastern route.

"We're excited that the commonwealth has come to that decision," Hanover County Administrator Cecil R. "Rhu" Harris Jr. said. "We have a very significant stop for Amtrak in Ashland. Continuing that service is very important to the county, the town and Randolph-Macon College, in particular."

Jennifer Scott with the Hanover Association of Businesses and Chamber of Commerce said, "We're just glad the conversation is still happening about trains coming down that corridor."

"It's really smart that our county leaders and the state government leaders are thinking about the transportation issues now," she said. "We believe that high-speed rail is one of the solutions."

The hometowns of 80 percent of Randolph-Macon students are near the Amtrak line between Richmond and Boston, R-MC President Robert R. Lindgren pointed out.

Ashland officials worried that the loss of passenger train service would slash the income of some of the town's businesses by 20 percent and force others to shut their doors.

Last year, 275,479 travelers used Amtrak's Staples Mill Station, making it Amtrak's busiest station in Virginia, while 16,497 passengers used the Ashland station.

Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine was one of eight governors at the White House yesterday for a roundtable discussion on high-speed rail. Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood challenged governors to think boldly when designing high-speed rail plans.

Detailed guidance for up to the first $8 billion in federal rail grant applications will be announced this month, and the first round of grants are expected to be awarded as soon as late summer.

The governor's office also announced yesterday that Virginia has signed an agreement with Amtrak to run an additional train between Richmond and Washington during commuter hours, starting in December. The train and previously announced daily service between Lynchburg and Washington will be the first state-supported intercity passenger rail services in Virginia.

The state will pay Amtrak, the national passenger rail corporation, $17.2 million to operate the two round-trip trains and $8 million to rehabilitate the cars and locomotives for the services.

The state rail agency's study found that capital improvements to the eastern route on the Buckingham Branch would have cost $402 million, considerably more than the $234 million needed for the existing western line, Badger said.

"The Buckingham Branch has been shown to fail as a reasonable alternative," agreed Mark E. Yachmetz, the Federal Railroad Administration's associate administrator for railroad development.

Now, Badger said, "the commonwealth can move forward with the I-95 corridor development plan to support enhanced passenger and freight rail service."



Contact Peter Bacqué at (804) 649-6813 or .

Political Editor Andrew Cain contributed to this report.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by qhgirl on June 05, 2009 at 7:31 am

For an occasional trip to DC, the Amtrak line as it is now is pretty good.  I go up there a few times a year for conferences and it takes about 2.5 hours.  I also had a wonderful driving experience where it took 4 hours.. I could “see” DC.. but couldnt get there..lol.  If it could be done in 45 minutes.. I think it would be pretty useful to a lot of folks especially since you have the metro on the other end and that is a pretty good way of getting around the DC metro area.  I wonder how many commuters would take a metro type train from the West end.. or hanover downtown.. or from southside to innsbrook?  It would require one thing we don’t have though (ok 2 things if you count money..lol)..regional cooperation.

Flag Comment Posted by bshawlee on June 05, 2009 at 5:52 am

You don’t have to worry about this issue any more.  You’re elected officials in Washington are giving the money to the people in Mr. Obama’s home state of Illinois.  The line selected for upgrading to high speed rail runs from St. Louis to Chicago.  He’s returning the favor to his voters.

For some reason the higher population density and greater traffic congestion on the east coast doesn’t matter.  What matters is politics.  Wake up people - the way you live is going to be directed by the federal government.  The choices available to you are going to be made in Washington without any consideration for whats really needed or of greater benefit to the most people - only what benefits the political party in power so that they can increase that power over you and your life.  In effect deciding that it is better for you to spend 3 hours and 45 minutes, like I did yesterday trying to get from D.C. to Richmond.  But hey, I do love to listen to the radio while stopped and not moving in 3 lanes of traffic.  Oh I left Washington at 2:55pm before the rush hour started.  Are that many people really taking off early every day?  Maybe with driving in all of that traffic going to and from work is beginning to work on their nerves and they were leaving work early to get to the doctor for more pills or the ABC store before it closes.  I certainly would.  Now if there was a train that I could have ride that could get me there and back in a day, I could have ridden that - oh wait, there is and I could have, but I didn’t.  So shame on me.  Maybe next time.

Flag Comment Posted by Whistler on June 04, 2009 at 8:01 pm

How ‘bout “we” maybe fix the roads first. Just a thought. I mean, I love the bumps on 295 and all (just one example)  but maybe…. naw .... what am I thinking , that wouldn’t be enough of a waste .... fine Light Rail it is. W00T moar taxes.

Flag Comment Posted by AG on June 04, 2009 at 6:21 pm

My source (http://www.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/article/RAIL25_20090424-222017/263772/) isn’t as good as yours but given the information in my earlier link and a little logic… 45 minutes makes more sense.

Maybe I’m an optimist

Flag Comment Posted by qhgirl on June 04, 2009 at 3:50 pm

AG..

If the time were really 45 min.. I would think that is good and probably worthwhile pursuing.. but the link I found with FAQ’s has a est time of 1.55-2 hrs for the trip from richmond to dc

http://www.sehsr.org/faq.html

Where had you heard the 45 minute number?  maybe the site I found isn’t accurate?  Believe me.. I am all for progress if the result is meaningful.. but it didn’t seem like it for only a 30 minute difference.  Cutting the time in half? that is pretty good.

Flag Comment Posted by AG on June 04, 2009 at 3:38 pm

Agreed, lets move forward!

For those as interested as I am, here is the official proposal from the Federal Government… it may answer a lot of the skepticism and assumptions I’m hearing (got a map too):

http://www.fra.dot.gov/Downloads/Final FRA HSR Strat Plan.pdf

FYI, getting from Richmond to DC (non-stop) at 110mph would take approx 45 minutes they say.

Flag Comment Posted by pete on June 04, 2009 at 1:43 pm

The trackage in question runs through Doswell, Mineral Beaverdam and Louisa before entering Charlottesville.  I’m not sure where Dillwyn is in relation to those towns mentioned.

Flag Comment Posted by qhgirl on June 04, 2009 at 1:22 pm

Pete.. I am a little confused about the Buckingham Branch line.. is that the same line that goes through Dillwyn in Buckingham county?  If so.. I am all for it.. I only live about 10 miles from there and would love to be able to highspeed it into the city:)

Flag Comment Posted by pete on June 04, 2009 at 1:16 pm

I don’t think we should rule Out the Buckingham line in terms of the State’s overall rail transportation plans.  It could once again prove to be an important rail link for passengers epically between Charlottesville, Richmond and Tidewater, especially as this region continues to develop.

As a comparison I looked at an Official Guide from 1952 a C&O timetable from 1957 and one from 1969.  In 1952 the line hosted two sets of expresses (the George Washington and the Sportsman/FFV) plus two sets of locals between C-ville and Richmond and another set of locals to Newport News. Curiously by 1957 the set of Charlottesville-Richmond locals remained, but the Tidewater locals were reduced to one round trip.  Of course by 1969 only the George Washington was left, but still hosting a flag stop at Doswell and other intermediate point.  My point being if we were smart we would continue to explore options of adding regional rail services along this line making it an attractive alternative to driving and allow travelers the opportunity to interface with north-south Amtrak services at Doswell.  Interregional buses could also stop there making Doswell a transit hub for residents along with visitors to Kings Dominion.

My problem with transportation planners is they don’t appear to think regionally like this opting instead to place all the emphasis on the north south runs, but neglecting feeder lines that could increase usage of all rail services.

Flag Comment Posted by win486 on June 04, 2009 at 12:34 pm

High speed….......  Staples Mill and stop in Ashland and stop in Frederickburg and several other places.  Guys that is not high speed.  High speed would start in Richmond and go to DC without stopping.  If people from Ashland wanted to take the train they would drive to Richmond. If people from Fredicksburg wanted to take it they would take the commuter train.  This is not a high speed transit as other cities know it.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement