High-speed rail line would include Ashland, Staples Mill

High-speed rail line would include Ashland, Staples Mill

DEAN HOFFMEYER/TIMES-DISPATCH

Ashland and Hanover County officials opposed an eastern route for proposed high-speed rail service through Richmond.

» 26 Comments | Post a Comment

The train still is going to run through the Ashland and Staples Mill stations.

The Federal Railroad Administration has dropped consideration of an eastern route for proposed high-speed rail service through Richmond that would have bypassed Ashland and Amtrak's main station on Staples Mill Road in Henrico County.

"We concluded that the eastern route didn't make a whole lot of sense," Charles M. Badger, the director of the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, said yesterday.

"It was more expensive and had more environmental impacts. There are some wetlands that the eastern route would have taken," he said. "And it had the trains tie back in north of Ashland, so it would eliminate service to Ashland and even Staples Mill."

During the past year, the state rail agency conducted an environmental study to select the most feasible route between Richmond's Main Street Station and Doswell in northern Hanover County for the U.S. southeast high-speed rail service to Washington.

The eastern route between Main Street Station and Doswell followed the Buckingham Branch rail line, which runs generally east of Interstate 95. The western route follows the CSX rail line, to the west of I-95.

Ashland and Hanover officials opposed the eastern route.

"We're excited that the commonwealth has come to that decision," Hanover County Administrator Cecil R. "Rhu" Harris Jr. said. "We have a very significant stop for Amtrak in Ashland. Continuing that service is very important to the county, the town and Randolph-Macon College, in particular."

Jennifer Scott with the Hanover Association of Businesses and Chamber of Commerce said, "We're just glad the conversation is still happening about trains coming down that corridor."

"It's really smart that our county leaders and the state government leaders are thinking about the transportation issues now," she said. "We believe that high-speed rail is one of the solutions."

The hometowns of 80 percent of Randolph-Macon students are near the Amtrak line between Richmond and Boston, R-MC President Robert R. Lindgren pointed out.

Ashland officials worried that the loss of passenger train service would slash the income of some of the town's businesses by 20 percent and force others to shut their doors.

Last year, 275,479 travelers used Amtrak's Staples Mill Station, making it Amtrak's busiest station in Virginia, while 16,497 passengers used the Ashland station.

Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine was one of eight governors at the White House yesterday for a roundtable discussion on high-speed rail. Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood challenged governors to think boldly when designing high-speed rail plans.

Detailed guidance for up to the first $8 billion in federal rail grant applications will be announced this month, and the first round of grants are expected to be awarded as soon as late summer.

The governor's office also announced yesterday that Virginia has signed an agreement with Amtrak to run an additional train between Richmond and Washington during commuter hours, starting in December. The train and previously announced daily service between Lynchburg and Washington will be the first state-supported intercity passenger rail services in Virginia.

The state will pay Amtrak, the national passenger rail corporation, $17.2 million to operate the two round-trip trains and $8 million to rehabilitate the cars and locomotives for the services.

The state rail agency's study found that capital improvements to the eastern route on the Buckingham Branch would have cost $402 million, considerably more than the $234 million needed for the existing western line, Badger said.

"The Buckingham Branch has been shown to fail as a reasonable alternative," agreed Mark E. Yachmetz, the Federal Railroad Administration's associate administrator for railroad development.

Now, Badger said, "the commonwealth can move forward with the I-95 corridor development plan to support enhanced passenger and freight rail service."



Contact Peter Bacqué at (804) 649-6813 or .

Political Editor Andrew Cain contributed to this report.

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by AG on June 04, 2009 at 8:08 am

qhgirl,

Just like the ballpark debates, I would argue that decentralizing development would only marginally benefit the outlying areas of Richmond.  We need to focus on redevelopment of downtown.  A strong and vibrant downtown would shine like a beacon to those who individuals and businesses looking to relocate!

We have tried patchwork planning, it isn’t working!

Flag Comment Posted by qhgirl on June 04, 2009 at 7:58 am

I think that a good place for a high speed rail “hub” would be near the airport with shuttles to Richmond work centers (like innsbrook area, downtown etc..).  I think main street has a lot of the issues that people say is a problem with putting a ballpark down there.  Parking and traffic would be a problem.  There will most likely be people more interested in leaving the Richmond area for higher paying jobs in DC on a daily basis as opposed to the reverse commute.

Flag Comment Posted by AG on June 04, 2009 at 7:36 am

Surely Peter Bacque doesn’t mean to call stops in Richmond, Staples Mill, Ashland, Doswell, etc… HIGH SPEED RAIL!?  Perhaps they are discussing the secondary rail system proposed to utilize existing tracks at lower speeds.  True high speed will only travel from city to city bypassing towns.

It only makes sense to make Main Street Station the hub for Richmond and to travel east of I-95 in rural country where we can safely reach high speeds!

Flag Comment Posted by Scott Burger on June 04, 2009 at 7:09 am

Well said, Seaboard!

Flag Comment Posted by Seaboard on June 04, 2009 at 4:06 am

Governor,
Your transportation department has already spent $130 million in taxpayer dollars making improvements to CSX tracks between Richmond and Washington and yet CSX won’t allow you to run any more than these two new round trip trains. Why?

Documents off the internet from VRE and DRPT indicate that your transportation department rail experts are stuck with using slots over CSX that VRE had in their contract from several years ago, slots they are not currently using. This article says your DOT will need to spend another $234 million just from Doswell south to Richmond alone ... and what will that get you from CSX .. 4 more slots?

Quit allowing CSX executives to dictate how the track is going to be used, especially right now when their freight train volume is down dramatically from where it was just a year ago, due to the poor economy.

The Commonwealth owned a controlling interest in the Richmond Washington track for over 150 years and one of your recent predecessors gave that control to CSX. But Congress created statutes in October that made the Surface Transportation Board responsible for enforcing mediation of passenger rail access on private freight rail trackage, and Congress isn’t through working on that problem yet, as highlighted in a Logistics Management magazine online article titled ... “Railroad shipping: Senators team up to craft new legislation focused on railroad antitrust exemption and reforming STB.“

Please tell you transportation experts at VDOT and DRPT and VRE to start using the new Federal system and ask the STB right now ... to fix the problem with CSX so that you can run enough new high speed passenger trains on schedules that the cities and communities want to be worth the public investment. If you’re going to head the National Democratic Party then several other states that are having the same problem with CSX are going to expect leadership on this issue. Why not start practicing for a solution to their problems by fixing your own CSX problem, first. If you’re legacy building with this new Amtrak partnership then why not build an even bigger and better legacy for yourself .... fix the problem.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement