State transit plan faces $851.5 million cut
RICHMOND, Va. -- Virginia transportation officials say they will have to slice $851.5 million out of Virginia's six-year transportation plan, which has already been hit with $3.7 billion in cuts since the spring of 2008.
However, the reduction announced yesterday amounts to a slight improvement over the state's August revenue estimates. Virginia will get something more than $31 million in additional funds for transportation than was forecast.
The plan's proposed spending has now sunk to a total of $22.5 billion for 2010-15.
The latest round of recommended cuts will fall most heavily on road maintenance ($277.1 million), highway construction ($255 million), administrative and support services ($115.2 million) and mass transit ($46.3 million).
"The rate of descent is slowing," Transportation Secretary Pierce R. Homer said yesterday at a meeting of the Commonwealth Transportation Board.
Virginia is being forced to use local road funds to shore up its primary and interstate highways, take road construction funds to repair existing highways, and pare back its public transit efforts, Homer said.
Among the cuts in construction work, the Virginia Department of Transportation is recommending that the U.S. 360 bridge replacement project over the Chickahominy River between Henrico and Hanover counties be dropped and that improvements to U.S. 360 in Mechanicsville be sharply reduced in scope.
As the budget crisis deepens, the Old Dominion's highway program is growing financially fragile.
Virginia is counting on receiving $5.5 billion in federal matching funds during 2010-15. But, Homer said, "we don't have enough state dollars to adequately match federal funds."
For instance, state transportation efforts rely on bonds for the state's matching share every year of the six-year plan, though Virginia's ability to borrow money is increasingly hampered by its shrinking revenues.
"If revenue reductions take us to the point I can't sell bonds," said Reta R. Busher, the VDOT's chief financial officer, "we have an issue."
Contact Peter Bacqué at (804) 649-6813 or
.
Reader Reactions
jogger, roads are the biggest expenditure of taxpayer supported welfare we have as it relates to infrastructure. If we effectively spent more money on mass transit then we wouldn’t actually need to spend millions and millions more on building and maintaining roads. Just imagine if Broad Street had a light rail line going from Downtown to Short Pump, or even just to Willow Lawn. It would be plausible to never need a car, even in Richmond…Or if we had a light rail line running from Downtown to Mechanicsville, improvements to 360 wouldn’t be needed. Take a look at the four GRTC Expess buses leaving Chesterfield Town Center ever day—They are packed! Check out how Boston, and even Charlotte, NC utilize mass transit, and you’ll understand.
Since the gas tax is stuck in 1984 dollars, Virginia should adjust road spending down to the same as the FY1984 budget. It makes no sense to build thousands of lane miles of road but never increase funding to pay for it all. Imagine trying to buy a car in 2010 with a 1984 budget.
Road funding should be eliminated. If car drivers want road construction let them pay the true cost. I’m tired of having 3rd world quality transit while my tax money subsidizes socialized roads for the car welfare dependent. let private enterprise take over road operations without public funding of any type.
mass transit funding should be eliminated. If people want mass transit let them pay the true cost. I’m tired of riding on crappy roads while my tax money subsidizes mass transit for the few. let private enterprise take over mass transit without public funding of any type. Also, cut administrative and support services in half at the very least. Salaries and expenses for administrative and support services are way out of line with their contributions to transportation.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement