VDOT makes ‘drastic’ cuts in budget
Battered by the recession, Virginia's highway and transit programs have shrunk by one-third in two years.
"We're back to basics," state Transportation Commissioner David S. Ekern said yesterday. "It's about pavements and bridges now. It's not about congestion. It's not about expansion."
Ekern made his comments after the Commonwealth Transportation Board adopted a $7.5 billion statewide transportation-improvement program for 2010-2015, down $4 billion from the $11.5 billion in the 2008-2014 program.
"The commonwealth is facing a crisis in transportation funding," Transportation Secretary Pierce R. Homer said in a statement. "These drastic reductions reflect our ongoing challenge to meet federal obligations and state maintenance needs while experiencing drastic declines in state and federal revenues."
Virginia has only enough of its own money to use to match federal grant dollars and to pay for mandated programs, according to Reta Busher, the Virginia Department of Transportation's chief financial officer.
Consequently, the cutbacks have eliminated the state funding distributed to localities for their own use on secondary, primary, urban and unpaved road work.
Federal transportation stimulus funds will blunt -- but they won't offset -- the reductions in Virginia's transportation revenues, state officials said.
The state is to receive $694.5 million in federal economic-stimulus funds, to be spent within three years. The board so far has awarded contracts for $81 million of the money.
However, the state highway program brought good news for metropolitan Richmond.
The board approved more than $97 million to start two ready-to-go projects in Richmond and Henrico County: rehabilitating 11 deteriorating bridges on Interstate 95 and repaving the intensely potholed Interstate 64 between I-95 and Parham Road.
"We're good to go," said Transportation Board member Gerald P. McCarthy of Richmond.
VDOT's chief engineer, Malcolm T. Kerley, hit one of the potholes on I-64 near Glenside Drive last week, blew out one of his tires and bent its wheel. "Even VDOT people are not immune," he said.
With transportation revenues tumbling, the board chopped VDOT's maintenance and operations for fiscal 2009-2010:
- shutting down 19 of the state's 42 interstate-highway rest areas and welcome centers;
- reducing motorist-service patrols in metropolitan areas;
- closing 51 VDOT local residency offices and equipment shops;
- scaling back interstate maintenance contracts;
- cutting roadside mowing and maintenance by $20 million; and
- paring some ferry services.
Aimed at saving $9 million a year, the rest-area closures have been a particular sore spot with the trucking and tourism industries, as well as local officials and members of the public, particularly along Interstate 81 in western Virginia.
"It's ridiculous," said Megan Svajda, the Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association's director of government relations. "This is the height of the tourist season. For any to be closed is detrimental to the tourist industry."
Tourism is big business in the state. Travelers spent almost $18.7 billion in Virginia in 2007 and generated $4.3 billion in payroll, according to the state tourism agency.
"We're a state that people have to go through," said Transportation Board Member James A. Davis of Winchester. "We really need to be friendly to them.
"It's shortsighted how we're going to precipitously close" the rest areas this summer, he said.
Ekern said VDOT is trying to accommodate the travel industry. "I'm not just going to throw up barricades" blocking travelers from the rest stops.
At yesterday's board meeting, Davis tried to use $9 million in highway paving money to keep the rest stops open, but the motion failed.
Contact Peter Bacqué at (804) 649-6813 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Maybe VDOT could just lay off the 2 guys who watch the 1 work?
anon.. as someone who regularly travels on 288.. i would take exception to your thought that we didn’t need it. Most major cities have “beltways” that allow people to easily get from one area in the region to another.. It is not realistic to believe that people won’t commute from outer areas. I don’t expect an expressway be built for 100 people.. but obviously the need was there.. so the state built it.. It is their “job” to take care of the infrastructure needs of the commonwealth and deal with growth and expansion. Not sure where all the “dead space” is that you are referring to because the last time I drove around it seemed like things were pretty well developed in henrico/chesterfield/hanover etc..
The days of massive new road building programs are over. Everyone recognizes the folly of building more outer corridors like Rt 288. It just creates pockets of dead space.
Urban sprawl is going to have to shrink. People living in Fredricksburg are not going to be able to commute to DC. There just aren’t enough dollars to build all those rush hour highways.
Sanity needs to be restored.
Having lived in Virginia all of my life, two things are clear: (1) A major reason for the shortfall in funds available for transportation is that the General Assembly, like Congress, has for years used transportation funds for other purposes and (2) closing rest areas is a high-profile, highly visible action designed to excite citizens into calling for massive tax increases.
Self-serving members of both parties have, for years, placed their pet partisan projects and personal interests ahead of sound financial management and allowed critical infrastructure to deteriorate.
Until the electorate stands up, takes notice, and seizes the initiative to eject these self-serving partisans from office, there is no hope for improvement.
I encourage every Virginian to become intimately involved in researching the performance of incumbents and learning about candidates in future elections. Simple put, we must elect officials who will work for the common good rather than vote on the basis of party labels or political propaganda.
It’s interesting that the same rhetoric about not wanting the stimulus program and how it doesn’t work from last week - has turned into wow we get two really needed projects (I-95 Bridges and I-64 Repavement) this week. If you want good roads, sorry folks, but you have to pay for them somehow!
I cannot understand why VDot does not have enough money? Where is it all going? Like the first poster said, VA is a ‘drive thru’ state and the sad part is that as people drive south to NC on their way to vacation, they have to endure one of the ugliest, most worn, and under maintained section of highway right through the center of our city. It seems to me that one of the ways we could help elevate the economy in Richmond is by changing people’s impression of our city and the easiest way to do that is by cutting the fricking grass along 95 and 64. Or by picking up the trash…or even better fixing the highway. Millions of people pass through our corridor every year. A little money spent wisely would help attract ore people to the city. I am relieved however find out that the repairing of 64 got approved, so i guess there is some good news. But come on, can’t we do better for our city?
When deciding where to cut the budget, safety should be a priority, but it’s not for the state. Up until a few weeks ago the weeds in the median on Patterson near Goochland were around 4 *feet* tall and obstructed vision near the intersection with Lauderdale. I alerted VDOT and they basically told me that because of budget cuts they couldn’t start cutting until a certain date and they’d get to it when they felt like it. It took two weeks after I contacted them for it to get mowed. I understand with reduced tax revenues that things need to be cut, but is keeping the roads safe really one of them??
I agree that closing rest areas is detrimental to the safety of travelers on the interstate system. It is difficult to comprehend how closing rest areas will save money with hundreds of thousands, millions perhaps, is spent on traffic cameras in NoVA and Hampton Roads, miles and miles of lighted interstate, and electronic message boards that often go unused.
Don’t knock the Rails to Trails project. As a native of Southside Virginia, this is a project putting local contrators to work and it has the real potential to spur growth in the equine industry and outdoor adventurists who want to escape the big city. I am a member of one of the southside revitalization groups, and I can speak first hand that interest is growing amongst that demographic. Unless you have lived in that area and have experienced the deep economic hardship of textile and tobacco industry collapse, you can’t quickly pass judgement on how crutial projects like this area to attracting new people to this region.
It’s time for Virginia to take a good, hard look at how we use transportation and what we are willing to pay for it. I say put the tolls back on the roads (we had them for years), and let’s collect substantial revenue from drivers passing through the state. Sell off the rest areas and redevelop them into gas stations, convenience stores, and retail opportunity. Property won’t go into disrepair, tax revenue will be generated and jobs created. Ohio and Pennsylvania did it and implimated a pay for the distance you drive turnpike system. The majority of citizens there don’t complain about it.
Oh, and you spelled ridiculous incorrectly.
I THINK IT IS REDICULOUS TO EVEN TALK ABOUT CUTS TO VDOT AND THEIR PROJECTS WHEN THE GOVERNOR IS SUPPORTING SUCH OUTRAGIOUS PROJECTS AS “RAILS TO TRAILS”. AREN’T OUR HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES MORE IMPORTANT THAN A TRAIL TO RIDE A BYCICLE OR WALK ON? LET’S GET BACK TO BASICS AND WALK WHEREEVER THEIR IS A NATURAL TRAIL WITHOUT SPENDING SUCH MONEY ON THIS PROJECT!!
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement