Schapiro: Spoils limited for victor in Virginia governor’s race
Published: November 1, 2009
Regardless of the outcome of Tuesday's gubernatorial election -- OK, so a lot of people have a pretty good idea who's going to win -- one thing is certain: The victor won't have squat to spend.
Tight money, perhaps the tightest since the Great Depression, combined with a divided JEFF E.
SCHAPIRO
statehouse could guarantee impasse, at a minimum, on the new governor's initiatives.
For example, Republican Bob McDonnell wants to pay for roads, in part, with the taxpayers' credit card by issuing billions in bonds, repaid with interest.
Problem is, the state is bumping up against the self-imposed ceiling on debt-backed financing: that annual bond costs not exceed 5 percent of revenue.
Another obstacle to McDonnell's pave-now, pay-later plan: As revenues, down another $1.5 billion, continue to fall -- and they will -- the state will be compelled to ease up on bonds, not having the required-by-law cash to underwrite them.
No wonder Democrat Creigh Deeds is open to higher taxes. But that's a message no one wants to hear.
The strictures on bonds are intended to preserve Virginia's triple-A credit rating, the highest possible and shared with only six other states.
This badge of honor -- the state was once so debt-phobic that, into the 20th century, outstanding bills from the Civil War took precedence to schools -- was imperiled on the watch of Virginia's last Republican governor, Jim Gilmore of no-car-tax fame.
It was saved during the term of a Democrat, Mark Warner, but only after he broke his no-new-taxes promise -- with no help from an anti-tax delegate: Bob McDonnell, now the heartthrob of a corpocracy that strongly backed Warner's tax rise.
If the state budget is ordinarily a plan for progress, in these extraordinary times it will prove a labyrinth of limitations -- a point explored by Jim Regimbal, a former budget analyst, in a report last month for U.Va.'s Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service (http://www.coopercenter.org -- click on Virginia News Letter).
Beyond a further slide in tax revenue, the time bombs, Regimbal notes, are numerous:
The loss in 2011 of a temporary cushion for Medicaid: $1.5 billion in federal stimulus funds. And with Medicaid costs swelling 8 percent a year, the state will need almost $2 billion to plug the hole partly filled by Obama bucks. Revenue growth won't do it.
Cutting Medicaid is easier said than done. Virginia's program is among the most parsimonious in the nation; it has few bells and whistles. One is mental-health coverage, which Republicans have long sought to expand.
And then there's the public-employee pension fund. Its costs are rising; investments falling. Both McDonnell and Deeds balk at shifting a sliver of the bill to workers.
Remedies such as job growth require investments Virginia can't afford, such as education. Sell ports, liquor stores and the lottery? Post-VITA-Northrop Grumman, outsourcing actually has to work and raise cash.
There are some big, potential -- short-term -- savings: Suspend all or part of $1 billion in car-tax relief, $400 million in credits for preserving the countryside and historic buildings, or $280 million in estate-tax repeal.
Doing so requires political willpower. There may be less of that than there is money.
Contact Jeff E. Schapiro at (804) 6496814 or
. Watch his video column Thursdays on TimesDispatch.com. Follow him at twitter.com/RTDSchapiro. Listen to his analysis Fridays at 8:33 a.m. on WCVE (88.9 FM).
Reader Reactions
Dear DarnYankee,
Well I do declare! From your response I can only ascertain that y’all are becoming more southern! Why certainly, “liberal” can mean many things; but such other scurrilous accusations against a fellow Virginian are just unacceptable in polite southern company.
The cotillion has become rather passé. Perhaps the Derby Day celebration with mint juleps would be more apropos for y’all. :)
I did reread your comment. However, suggesting “reduce state contributions to arts” can indirectly spill over into teachers and schools. If local governments see the state cutting the arts wildly, they will follow the lead. Unfortunately, arts programs are usually some of the first to be cut. I also was in marching band and all-state chorus when in high school - great learning experiences! Many of the state’s agencies associated with the arts have already been cut by 15%.
Technically the car tax was not repealed. State law (§ 58.1-3524) defines the reimbursement as “tax relief.“ Nevertheless, it was a gimmick that got Governor Gilmore elected and destroyed the state budget. If the car tax was repealed, local governments would have to find another source of revenue.
In the end, Mr. Schapiro is right on the money; whoever is elected won’t have squat to spend!
P.S. Y’all bring out my Southern persona :) All in fun! We need some humor in this otherwise dire financial situation.
Dear Mr. Hague, I don’t believe that my comments were unfair in any way. Mr. Schapiro has clearly demonstrated his liberal bias in numerous articles.
I would respectfully ask you to re-read my comments, sir. I did not suggest that funding be cut from music teachers or schools. In fact, I will have you know that I played in an award winning marching band and sang in the “state chorus” in my high school days.
I agree that “no car tax” became a shell game. The Commonwealth should never have reimbused the localities for the repealed tax, and that it should have been totally repealed.
As for the cotillion, please send my invitation to someone who cares. I plan to stay home and watch the Steelers.
Dear DarnYankee,
You’re south of the Mason-Dixon line. Unfairly attacking a gentleman, Mr. Schapiro, in such a disquieting manner is considered a faux pas of the highest order. As Southerners, we ascribe to the principle that folks can disagree without being disagreeable. Regretfully, you’re invitation to the cotillion is in jeopardy.
That said, I agree with most of your suggestions as well as those of Mr. Schapiro. I do take exception to drastically cutting funding for the arts. Say to yourself the alphabet. Did you find yourself singing the “ABC” song? Probably. If so, thank the arts and a music teacher. It’s going to take a lot of hard work and difficult decisions to get Virginia out of its financial mess.
“No car tax” was a shell game from the start, i.e. pay taxes to the state who then paid the localities. Shifting the car tax back to vehicle owners does amount to a tax increase; but anyone willing to drive a shiny new car, especially all those who cashed in on “cash for clunkers,“ should pay their own taxes.
Only the fevered brain of a flaming liberal nutcase like Jeff Schapiro could suggest that, “suspending all or part of $1 billion in car-tax relief,” would constitute a savings for the state’s government. Here are some real potential for “savings;” make sure that only legal Virginia citizens are receiving services of any kind from the Commonwealth (e.g. Health Department, Department of Behavioral Health, Medicaid, etc.); require DOC and county/city jail inmates to pay a daily fee for their meals/supervision, reduce state contributions to arts and other organizations that do not directly provide a service; ensure that transportation funds are spent on projects that will benefit all Virginians, not private railroad companies or bicycle riders; require all “education” programs, (pregnancy prevention, drug and alcohol abuse prevention, DARE, drop-out prevention, etc.) to demonstrate independently verifiable results or drop them, ensure that 100% of the costs of mandatory programs like the Virginia Alcohol Safety Action Program (VsASAP) are covered by the fees that they charge and increase the fees where they do not; use as a base budget the 2004-5 biennium and require agencies to justify programs and expenditures from the pre-Warner tax increase period.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement