Williams: A museum is better for the bottom

» 6 Comments | Post a Comment

You are about to read three words you thought you'd never see in this space:

I was wrong.

Three months ago, I boosted Shockoe Bottom as the inevitable site of a new Richmond baseball stadium and all but urged Mayor Dwight C. Jones to grab a ceremonial chrome-plated shovel and break some ground, already. As it turns out, the stadium proposal was about to have dirt shoveled on it. It died last week when Highwoods Properties withdrew its $363 million redevelopment plan for Shockoe Bottom.

In hindsight, my frustration at inaction on the ballpark issue had clouded my reason. Shockoe Bottom has proven itself to be an impractical location for a ballpark. Too many people think baseball there is a poor fit.

So where do we go from here?

We've got a vacant lot in the Bottom and a gaping hole in our historical interpretation. Let's fill both.

What was a crowded proposal -- ballpark, mixed-use development, transportation center and heritage site -- has been pared down significantly. All concerned parties should move apace to build a heritage campus that includes a slavery museum.

Education is more important than baseball. But as an educational tool, an institution devoted to Richmond's slave heritage -- which, really, is one with the nation's -- would be as invaluable as any new school.

This is the right move -- culturally, spiritually and economically. It doesn't take a consultant's study to realize that the Bottom would derive more economic benefit from a tourist magnet open 365 days a year than from a self-contained, seasonal facility.

That ballpark site, behind the 17th Street Farmers' Market between Franklin and Broad streets, lies between the Lumpkin's Slave Jail archaeological site and a Burial Ground for Negroes. Shockoe Bottom's alleys were lined with slave-auction houses. Locations don't come any more ready-made for development.

As frustrated as I grew at the inaction over a ballpark, the gridlock over a proposed slavery museum has been even more galling. It's time to act.

This means the Richmond Slave Trail Commission, which has been curiously passive at this critical juncture, needs to seize the moment. And yes, L. Douglas Wilder, this might be a moment for you, too.

It is apparent to anyone that Wilder's dream, the U.S. National Slavery Museum in Fredericksburg, is as dead as the Shockoe Bottom ballpark. The Web site is down, and the phone has been disconnected. The Fredericksburg museum needs a new home. Any Richmond museum would need donors.

Everyone knows there has been long-standing rivalry and drama between Wilder and state Sen. Henry L. Marsh III, the political mentor to Jones and Del. Delores L. McQuinn. McQuinn heads the Slave Trail Commission, which Wilder would have nothing to do with as mayor. It's time for anyone who truly wants a monument to slave history to put rivalry and pettiness aside.

Baseball was a stretch in the Bottom, but a black-heritage site is a natural fit there. This tragic history, an essential part of who we are, has been paved over for too long.

We need to act before Richmond burnishes its reputation as a place where visions go unrealized.



Contact Michael Paul Williams at (804) 649-6815 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: slavery museum,shockoe bottom,rk30,michael paul williams,baseball panel,baseball in richmond,baseball,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by a63roni on July 03, 2009 at 2:31 pm

I never understood why the National Slavery Museum should be in Fredrickburgs and not Richmond, where many slaves first set foot on American soil, and were warehoused and sold to locals and buyers from other parts of the South. A lot of African Americans from all over the US have roots here.

Flag Comment Posted by VARoadWarrior on July 02, 2009 at 1:51 pm

MPW - you were not wrong back on May 19 (not even two months ago by the way).  The problem with this community (evidenced by comments from squier13 and others) is that we can’t embrace the value of two competing, yet potentially complimentary, ideas at one time.  Since when did it have to be a ballpark or a museum?  Since when do we need to choose between schools and a ballpark?  Although the naysayers would like everyone to believe it, there is not one giant pot of money that feeds each of these initiatives.

Jim Collins, author of “Good to Great”, talks about the genius of the word AND.  We can have a museum AND a ballpark AND good schools.  But we need effective leadership to put the pieces of puzzle together.  Richmond can go from good to great, but we need leaders who are not afraid to act.

Highwoods withdrew their proposal (actually both proposals: Shockoe Center AND the Boulevard; Highwoods understood the potential for doing BOTH) because the City was ignoring them while the RTD was busy publishing the “plans” from every crackpot out there, real estate developer and columnist alike.

If we need to make a choice, how about we choose to act?

Flag Comment Posted by 23230 on July 02, 2009 at 12:45 pm

It would be great to have a Natl Slavery Museum there—I agree 100%. But this is Richmond, Michael-Paul, (not some high-falutin’ place like Norfolk, or a liberal bastion like Birmingham Ala). So the slavery museum idea will get smacked in-the-face by the only logic Richmonders know: 1. What about traffic? 2. Is county money needed to help pay for it? 3. We’ve got bigger priorities 4. Who would go to that crime-ridden area?

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on July 02, 2009 at 10:45 am

lol, MPW I told you you were wrong and asked you to retract your pro-ballpark essay.  I’ll take this admission in lieu of the action I asked for previously!

But seriously, City-led development of this area is NOT a priority. The Bottom is coming along just fine, and within five years the transit situation at Main St Station will be drastically different than it is today. 

Let’s fix our schools first and worry about Shockoe Bottom some other day.

Flag Comment Posted by drhoagie on July 02, 2009 at 10:20 am

Wouldn’t a museum disturb the same sacred land where slaves once stood too?

Let’s be consistent here.

Flag Comment Posted by paxham on July 02, 2009 at 7:08 am

mpw, you blow with the wind.  Since when were a baseball park and a museum incompatible and where were these objections a few weeks ago?

There is a holocaust museum behind Tobacco Row, a Poe Museum on Main Street.  Why not a Slave history center near the stadium.  A ballpark would bring Richmonder to the Bottom to experience the full range of Richmond history.

Have you figured out what is going to happen when the whole area is underwater?

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement