Williams: Let the children hear Obama

» 65 Comments | Post a Comment

What?

Parents are protesting an American president's message that their children study hard and stay in school?

Some school systems, cowed by grumbling parents or perhaps politically simpatico, are refusing to broadcast President Barack Obama's back-to-school address?

A pro-education message by our president is being suppressed by educators. Goals that should be universally embraced are being treated as if they emerged from "The Manchurian Candidate."

Local school divisions, with the exception of Richmond, are party to this disgrace. Chesterfield, Hanover and Powhatan counties are not broadcasting Obama's speech on Tuesday, but they will make the speech available after it airs to give parents a chance to decide whether they want their children to watch it.

Henrico County is taking a less direct but no less stifling approach: No teacher is to show the message Tuesday without contacting parents first.

Chesterfield's statement said that "though Chesterfield County Public Schools embraces the president's message on challenging students and is grateful for the support he has extended in the form of federal stimulus funding for public education, we do not wish to interfere with our staff's ability to repeat past opening-day successes."

In other words, "Show us the money and shut up, Mr. President."

Powhatan Superintendent Margaret S. Meara said this: "We mean no disrespect to anyone but rather wish to extend our respect to parents, who we feel have the right to make choices for their children."

But if she has to disrespect the president in the bargain, something is amiss.

Message to Meara: Powhatan has a race problem. It had one even before the Tahliek Taliaferro slaying played out to its dissatisfying courthouse conclusion. Your decision is not helpful in improving that perception inside and outside the county.

Presidents George H.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan pulled off this sort of speech with barely a peep. I hope the different standard carved for Obama doesn't have anything to do with him being African-American. But you have to wonder when angry voices seek to silence this speech through ignorance and hatred, or spout non sequiturs about socialism and indoctrination.

Obama, raised part of his childhood by a single mom, earned degrees from two Ivy League schools. He has a credible platform to speak on academic achievement without excuses. But some folks simply don't want their kids to hear it.

People have assigned political motives to Obama's speech even as they rail against it for nakedly political reasons. But a nation grinds to a halt if its citizens view everything through a partisan lens.

We're facing tremendous challenges. If we can't agree on the need for students to study hard, how will we unite to tackle more contentious issues?

When we censor a school-time speech by a president, we're that much closer to striking a match over a pile of library books.

The schoolhouse is not the place for parents to impose their political worldview on their children. They have the home for that. A well-rounded education allows a student to process different ideas and choose those that fit.

If parents and school systems have a problem with that, it's not the president who is attempting a brainwashing.



Contact Michael Paul Williams at (804) 649-6815 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by SG on September 12, 2009 at 12:17 pm

Posted by ( SmartGuy ) on September 11, 2009 at 10:27 pm

I find it humorous that so many of you are appalled that the president of the United States DARE to speak to citizens of the country! What nerve! Those of us who saw GW Bush as a bumbling idiot who didn’t know his @ss from his face didn’t openly petition for him to quit holding press conferences, appearing at town hall meetings or visiting elementary schools. We just laughed at the aftermath of it and mocked him for his lunacy.

Besides all that, do you realize that your kids are taught every day by teachers who have political opinions, too? You just don’t know what they are! What if teachers had to declare their political party affiliations. Would you sue the schools if your kid was placed in the class of a teacher with the “wrong” views? Come on people, grow up. The world is not going to end.


And Obama hasn’t made stupid comments? Gimme a break.  How about the Channeling Reagan, Special Olympics and Stupidly comments?  Then there is the denials of knowledge of Wright’s comments and Blago’s corruption.  This guy’s a dope unless he has his trusty teleprompter in front of him.

He can’t give us any meaningfull cost savings on this health care reform and blames Repubs for its current failure which is an outright lie!  He can’t get all the Dems on-board. 

The fact is the speech he made on 9/8 had to be revised from its original form.  The speech that was shown on Tues is not what was originally planned.  I didn’t trust this clown to actually present the speech that was posted on his website several days prior to 9/8.  I’ve seen the speech and have no problem with my kid seeing now.

Regarding your comment on teachers political opinions.  There definitly was a bias (brainwashing) in the classroom prior to the election last year.  My kid came home from 3rd grade last year and said he was the only kid in school who didn’t vote for Obama in the mock election.  My neighbors were shocked to hear their kids voted for Obama.

All I want the school to do is teach my kid math, science, reading/writing and history.  That’s all.

BTW, I was not a real big fan of Bush.  Obama is not the Messiah that everyone was making him out to be.  The message I want my kid to learn is be very carefull and don’t get your hopes up about ANY politician. Don’t let the media make your choice for you.  Read as much as he can about a candidate from MANY different sources before formulating a decision.

Flag Comment Posted by greta on September 12, 2009 at 9:19 am

I seem to be missing all the good stuff by going to bed before midnight.
Someone wrote a very good post in this thread recently, I apoligize, but i do not remember the name, but if i got it right the gist was that they write to incite. That is their job. Think of the interest and feedback that is generated by their racist columns.
If they do not whip up controversy they are out of a job.
For my own part I am quite sure that much if not most of the vitriol is genuine and the job matches the man very well.
As stated in the above article I think that Chesterfield in particular made its case for not presenting the speech very well.
And for the posters who keep throwing up other presidents making the same speeches with no reprecussions, I know that at least the elder Bush’s speech caused a huge stink with the Dems. in Congress sicking the GAO on him for attempting to influence school children
with his political agenda.
They ALL made the speeches for the same cynical reason. It was for political gain. What better than a captive audience of at least, in part, the very next-in-line group of voters.
The accompanying package of “suggested instructional materials” was a huge miscalculation. But with this administration, what else is new?
Civil protest is still legal in this country and it is not attractive for citizens to blast the previous president out of one side of their mouth and demand “respect” for the current one out of the other.
And worst of all not even recognize the irony.

And for all you night owls.

“Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast.“
        Oscar Wilde

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on September 12, 2009 at 8:10 am

Mr. Williams is a commentator. It’s his job to pass along his observation and take on the passing scene and provoke you to thought. His observational style is closely related to Leonard Pitts who could find a way to make a major race issue out of an elementary school kickball game.

It’s important to understand what he does and why he does it. It makes it easier to contend with.

As for listening to the president speak. School kids are exposed to all kinds of ideas and people all the time. Give them some credit, give them your time as a parent and everything will be fine.

There’s lots of battles worth fighting, this ain’t one of them.

Flag Comment Posted by SmartGuy on September 11, 2009 at 9:32 pm

Powhatanva, I happen to agree with you that a lot of Williams’ stuff reeks of racial motivation or simply trying to stir the pot when there’s no reason to do so.

But your analogy about letting the Socialist Party leader speak to students is absurd and embarrassing. Barack Obama is the PRESIDENT of the Unitd States, whether you or anyone else likes or respects that. The leader of the free world. Of course we wouldn’t let any party leader address all school children, but to suggest that Obama is no different than such a leader is truly insane.

Flag Comment Posted by SmartGuy on September 11, 2009 at 9:27 pm

I find it humorous that so many of you are appalled that the president of the United States DARE to speak to citizens of the country! What nerve! Those of us who saw GW Bush as a bumbling idiot who didn’t know his @ss from his face didn’t openly petition for him to quit holding press conferences, appearing at town hall meetings or visiting elementary schools. We just laughed at the aftermath of it and mocked him for his lunacy.

But MOST of us respected the fact that he was the president of the United States. There is a deep hatred of Obama as a person that I just don’t understand.

Besides all that, do you realize that your kids are taught every day by teachers who have political opinions, too? You just don’t know what they are! What if teachers had to declare their political party affiliations. Would you sue the schools if your kid was placed in the class of a teacher with the “wrong” views? Come on people, grow up. The world is not going to end.

Flag Comment Posted by Powhatanva on September 11, 2009 at 9:19 pm

I have been deeply offended by Mr. Michael Paul Williams writings over the last year.  It is difficult to determine whether Mr. Williams’ articles regarding Powhatan, specifically the Taliaferro case and the Obama school speech, represent base yellow journalism or mindless liberal ideological rants with no basis in reality.

Mr. Williams characterizes Powhatan as a community seething with racial tension, lead by individuals determined to burn books and having two sets of white sheets in their homes.  (One for the beds and one for wearing.)  His accusations are ridiculous.

  Powhatan does not have a long or tortured history of racial problems.  The death of Mr. Taliaferro last year generated a biracial concern for our community and the families involved.  A cross-section of the community representing different ages, genders, faiths and races attended the funeral and waited on the Courthouse grounds for the jury’s verdict.  Those who played a role in the taking of Mr. Taliaferro’s life were tried and convicted by a biracial jury.

Furthermore, the decision to tape the President’s speech was not racially motivated.  Several factors went into the decision to record the speech:  the President gave little notice of his desire to broadcast the speech; he did not provide an advance copy of the speech; it is difficult to rearrange the schedule on the first day of school; and the limited supporting material, which the White House forwarded to schools, had some questionable directives.


    The main reason I supported taping the speech and allowing parents the option of subjecting their children to the speech was parental rights.  Mr. Williams wrote:  “The schoolhouse is not the place for parents to impose their political worldview on their children . . .  A well-rounded education allows a student to process different ideas and choose those that fit ”  Supporting this notion means encouraging parents to abrogate their duty and responsibility to monitor and be involved in their child’s education.

Mr. Williams absurdly says censoring the speech means we are close to “striking a match over a pile of library books.  To illustrate the ridiculousness of this statement:  How would Mr. Williams like a member of the National Socialist Party being allowed to explain the underpinnings of the final solution to students?  Hopefully, the hyperbole dripping from my hypothetical situation demonstrates how reasonable time, place and content restrictions are needed in schools.

Hopefully, the President’s speech will be non-partition, apolitical and inspire everyone to excel in their academic endeavors.  At the same time, I respect a patents right to be involved in the development of their child’s school curriculum, to monitor the ideologies to which their child are exposed and protect their children from what they deem inappropriate.  I further understand, unlike Mr. Williams, that government, in general, and schools, in particular, work for the people and do not dictate to the people.

Flag Comment Posted by lineone on September 08, 2009 at 8:40 pm

RichmondDave

Unfortunately, you exhibited the exact tactic that turns legitimate discourse into a “gotcha game:” take a selective quote and run away with it; or, at least in your case, stumble away from it. I’m absolutely positive that you have been asked to provide additional identification when presenting a credit card to a vendor – all of us (including me, and I’m white) have had to, but not nearly as often as people of color, and we’re rarely followed around the store by security as we contemplate our purchase – although that too may happen to others.  The fact that two people undergo the same experience does not mean the experience is the same, nor does it imply that the reason for such an action was the same reason.

Also, I said nothing in my reply to Mr, Williams column about political beliefs.  I never even implied that having an opposing political view to mine makes anyone a racist. You, RichmondDave, were kind enough to do that. I merely stated that racism today is more subtle than it was in the time of lynching and cross-burning, but no less devastating.  I have friends who think Limbaugh is the 21st Century version of Voltaire, a friend who is a Marxist, and many more who are as apolitical as blue-tailed skinks. I don’t really care what your political beliefs, or anyone else’s political beliefs, are - I just want those beliefs to be articulated in a fashion that is comprehensible and conducive to a solution or two.

Finally, you may also want to consider that many folks smarter than I believe that it is virtually impossible for white people to accuse a person of color of racism.  It’s an intriguing notion.  Given our Country’s history and response to discrimination, given the fact that we whites manage the political, financial, and informational structures of the US – how in the name of heaven, except through ignorance or laziness can we claim that we have been discriminated against?  We may be embarrassed, provoked, or inconvenienced – but discriminated against? – Difficult to imagine.

Mr. Williams articulated a fine argument, asked many important questions, and implied that we should all read between the lines of any statement, with the appropriate dose of salt.

RichmondDave, contrary to what you think, I don’t project my beliefs.  I hold them dearly, close to the chest, and check frequently for true-line and squareness, by listening to as many views as the hours in the day will allow me.  I’m old enough to appreciate patience and the advantages of pausing before I make a fool of myself (although, to be honest, I often fail at that) – but really, RichmondDave, I would have preferred reading your thoughts on the President’s address, not your piggy-backing on Randy and 12step.  Maybe next time.

John Wagner

Flag Comment Posted by SG on September 07, 2009 at 6:13 pm

I’m happy that Hanover County had the good sense to scrap this nonsense.  The kids were brainwashed enough last year before the election.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on September 07, 2009 at 3:48 pm

12step: Re: Your post from 2:46 this morning. My opinion is that as a society, we can never be so self satisfied to sit back on our haunches for any given period of time. Homework needs to be done. You can trust certain things, but, you gotta be smart and verify - it’s tiresome, but, hard work is the only way I know to stay ahead of things.

In the military, I was taught in Basic Non-Commissioned Officer’s Course (BNOC)that you inspect what you expect and that you’re only as good as your last inspection. Human nature and history seems to be a never ending cycle of making some of the same basic mistakes over and over again. Peter Drucker astutely pointed out that the vast majoirty of problem are generic, they’ve happened before at some point in history - very rarely will you run across a truly unique problem. Somewhere between ignorance and arrogance you’ll find the source of most human difficulties.

I think the United States is the best country on earth, despite our current leadership. I’ll probably get slapped by my fellow right wingers for saying this, but, I’ll take the United States with Barack Obama as president any day over living in any other country under any one of their leaders. I know that President Obama’s on the clock and that in two years, he could lose his majority in congress and in three years, he could be packing his boxes to go home to Chicago. If we can recover from a Revolution, a Civil War, presidential assassinations, the riots of the 1960’s and the ups and downs of the stock market, these times too shall pass. We have a way of taking care of our own. So, I’m not a pessimist. I believe that we can fix whatever Obama breaks and whatever Bush and Clinton broke before him. We’re Americans dagnabbit - we make it and the Japanese form a company to manufacture its knockoffs!!

Like Eugene Kranz advised his people during the Apollo 13 crisis, “Let’s work the problem, let’s not make things worse by guessing”. I’d love it if all politicians worked the problems and not the symptoms.

In the big picture, we’re going to be just fine - Glenn Beck can sit in his bomb shelter and eat potted meat and Keith Olbermann can explode from rage and constipation like Mr. Creosote in Monty Python’s “The Meaning of Life”. We’re gonna be just fine. It’s just like having teenagers, you gotta go through the pain of dealing with their ups and downs but before you know it, somehow they surprise you turn out far better than you expected.

Flag Comment Posted by RichmondDave on September 07, 2009 at 3:10 pm

Well put, Randy, I guess you could call that the “Inconvenient Truth”.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement