Williams: Did broken law lead to fatal GRTC accident?

» 18 Comments | Post a Comment
MORE
GRTC driver shouldn't have had earlier charge dismissed

WILLIAMS: Did broken law lead to fatal GRTC accident?

Even if everyone had done the right thing, Loucendia Reed Lambert still might have been hit and killed by a GRTC bus.

But people failed to act properly in several instances, which makes Lambert's death all the more painful.

Bus driver Teresa L. Jones did not follow GRTC policy by reporting to her employer that she had been charged with reckless driving and a seat-belt violation while driving in a private car in May.

Jones had the charge dismissed after she attended an eight-hour, court-referred driving school. GRTC may have never learned about the charges against her if not for the 14th Street accident last week that took the life of Lambert, 55, a Virginia Department of Health employee from Prince George County.

As it turns out, Jones should not have been permitted to take the course.

In July 2008, a law went into effect prohibiting courts from dismissing a charge against a commercial driver operating a private car as a result of that person's attendance at a driver-improvement clinic.

The new law brought Virginia into compliance with federal safety regulations for buses and trucks, said Melanie Stokes, spokeswoman for the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles.

"How this occurred, DMV unfortunately can't answer that question, since it was a matter for the courts," Stokes said. "I don't know what happened, to be honest with you."

The police summonses for Jones' violations identify her as a commercial driver's license holder.

Since the accident, Jones has been removed from service and is on paid leave. If Jones had disclosed the earlier charges against her, she would have remained on duty, said John M. Lewis Jr., GRTC's chief executive officer. "We have to let the judicial system take its course."

Such due process is a common requirement in union contracts, he said. "And, quite honestly, I think it's fair. Due process is an important part of what we are. In our case, it also makes sense from a financial standpoint. If I were to act immediately, I'd lose an employee. I'd likely have to pay overtime to handle that employee's duties." And if the charged employee were found not guilty, GRTC would owe him or her back pay, he said.

I'm a big fan of due process. But what if evidence suggests before adjudication that a bus operator's behavior makes him or her a risk to passengers or the public? Our region is already loath to embrace mass transit. It can ill afford an accident that erodes confidence in the system or its drivers.

And what if other drivers are following Jones' lead in making a traffic charge a matter of "don't ask, don't tell"?

Self-reporting is an admirable concept held together only by the threads of employee integrity. Jones took a detour around disclosure. The law that should have served as a barricade against such a maneuver wasn't followed.

Thanks to a breakdown in the adjudication process, Jones managed to keep her charges secret until tragedy struck.

GRTC, the Richmond Police Department and Richmond General District Court traffic judges need to meet as soon as possible to figure out what went wrong in Jones' case. It can be a matter of life or death.



Contact Michael Paul Williams at (804) 649-6815 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: michael paul williams,grtc,dmv,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by WC on October 10, 2009 at 7:03 am

Alright guys, has anyone read the part of “she is on paid-leave” pending her case. If she wasn’t on paid leave and was proven innocent, they would have PAID HER BACK.. Are you serious? Even if she was proven innocent, why would they have to pay her back? Court costs/fees, time, etc. of the court and GRTC are also being wasted here.

Flag Comment Posted by north on October 09, 2009 at 9:55 am

There are some racist mofos on here aren’t there.

Flag Comment Posted by Randy on October 08, 2009 at 8:22 pm

I’m not up to speed on all the facts, is the villain of this story by chance…...a white person or the white “establishment”? That’s one of the better ways of getting to the bottom of an MPW or Leonard Pitts commentary. I could be wrong here, but, the percentages are with me.

Flag Comment Posted by Oriole33 on October 08, 2009 at 6:56 pm

It’s a stretch to say a broken law led to the pedestrian’s death. Suppose the driver had not received a speeding ticket in her POV. Would the accident still have happened? Under the same circumstances of that day- YES! I don’t know all the details as they are rather hush,hush. Was the driver not paying attention? Was the pedestrian walking against the light and not paying attention? But from a personal standpoint, here is the BOTTOM LINE: In a confrontation between a human and a bus, the bus always wins. I would never cross in front of a bus, truck, car, whatever; unless I made eye-to-eye contact with the driver and my presence was acknowledged by the driver. PERIOD! Common sense prevents most accidental deaths. Any pedestrian must assume that the driver of any unknown vehicle is a moron until proven otherwise. The pedestrian bears personal responsibility as does the driver.

Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on October 08, 2009 at 1:33 pm

LegalAmerican,

Today we agree on something.  It was human error and only the fault of the driver.  However, I don’t think GRTC is entirely without some responsibility.  I think this incident speaks to the need to provide better training, better standards of practice, better supervision and observation of drivers.  How about “secret shoppers” (people to ride the bus anonymously and report on whether or not the driver met a list of standards), more frequent retrainings or supervisor ride-alongs.  How about something online where you can post complaints about the buses that’s visible to the public.  GRTC officials can look into it and answer back for all to see (transparency!)

I don’t think the city is at all responsible for this, however it would probably be worth the expense to look at some of the cross walks around the capital area, particularly along Broad.  Perhaps something modified to enhance safety. An underground walk or skywalk?  Retimed lights.  No turn on red. etc

Flag Comment Posted by Mike S. on October 08, 2009 at 1:32 pm

Does anyone have any facts on this “accident” - was Ms. Jones turning on a red light?  Was Ms. Lambert crossing against a red light?

Flag Comment Posted by flyfishn2 on October 08, 2009 at 12:48 pm

GOOD GRIEF…

It was SIMPLY a person NOT PAYING ATTENTION who was driving a bus that hit and killed Mrs. Lambert…..

It doesn’t matter whether she was black or white, it doesn’t matter how many years she drove a bus, it doesn’t matter how many prior violations she had, it DOESN’T EVEN MATTER WHETHER SHE HAD BREAKFAST OR NOT!...

She was not in control of the bus…she did not have her eyes on the road…SHE KILLED AN INNOCENT, HARDWORKING WOMAN BY simply not having control of the vehicle!

Did she mean to kill another human being that morning….I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT!

HOWEVER, we now have a family that is motherless, sisterless, grandmaless, and so on….

QUESTION IS:  What is going to satisfy the loss of this special person due to the carelessness of Ms. Jones?

No way was the bus company responsible, no way was the city responsible, no way was the traffic lights responsible….IT WAS HUMAN ERROR…..PERIOD!

H U M A N   E R R O R!

Flag Comment Posted by lakotahope on October 08, 2009 at 10:20 am

-Question should be—As a GRTC bus driver, would she have been allowed to keep her job and resume driving at a later time if she reported the earlier charge. She had been with the Co. 3 yrs, so I would assume she is no longer on a probationary period.
-the courts erred in allowing the dismissal of the reckless driving. Maybe she gave them an older license without the CDL on it.
-lastly, if we look back on the last hour, would things be any different if we or anyone had done something different, and what would have happened if something different had been done? Could be a totally different scenario we’d be discussing….

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on October 08, 2009 at 9:27 am

Excuse me?  If Ms. Jones had reported the charge to her boss(es) as required, she should have been removed from the job, thus she wouldn’t have been chatting and driving on that fateful day, thus Ms. Lambert would have safely made it through that intersection alive.  How might it be that she would still have been killed that day?

I believe the key to your answer is in the tenth paragraph:

If Jones had disclosed the earlier charges against her, she would have remained on duty, said John M. Lewis Jr., GRTC’s chief executive officer.

Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on October 08, 2009 at 9:19 am

I think MPW is trying to blame everyone except the person who actually committed the crime, as he usually does.  The accused is always the real victim in an MPW concocted story.  I still don’t understand why the RTD continues to employ him.

Any of you watch The Wire? Reminds me of the reporter who was making up stories (literally, just creating crimes and other stories)... the honest reporter who blew the whistle got fired, and the dishonest reporter got an award for his writing.  Perhaps that story line was based on the RTD?  (I await my comment to be deleted Mr. or Ms. Comment Monitor, go for it).

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement