Build it, and will they come?
Let's play ball!
Columnist Mike Williams says it's time to stop debating and build a ballpark in Shockoe Bottom.It's time to end this long, drawn-out debate over the best site for a new baseball stadium in Richmond.
The Shockoe Bottom location represents the only real momentum we have toward a ballpark. Highwoods Proper ties, which has proposed the Shockoe Center development, appears to be the big-league player in the batter's box.
Mayor Dwight C. Jones is correct in saying there is no consensus on the ballpark. But if we wait to build consensus, we'll never build a ballpark. People are entrenched in their points of view.
The ever-cautious Jones must lead here, moving various parties and re gional partners beyond self-interest.
I still believe that aesthetically, a spot on the south bank of the James River would be a grand slam, but that's not going to happen. As for The Diamond site on the Boulevard, a sports-facility consultant said it best:
"It would be a generational mistake to build again at The Diamond site," said Patrick Zohn. "It would be the mistake of history repeating itself. It runs counter to what any responsible firm or entity involved with urban planning would tell you."
Everyone but Richmond seems to know downtown is the place to go. Frankly, it's easy to envision a ballpark in the Bottom if you could build one that wouldn't flood.
Don't tell me that the suburbanites won't come to Shockoe Bottom. Part of the attachment to The Diamond, I'd argue, is at least partially rooted in an irrational fear of downtown. But I suspect that for hardcore baseball fans, the love of the sport would eventually outweigh those fears. As they said in "Field of Dreams," build it and they will come.
The Shockoe stadium would be as convenient to interstate access as The Diamond. Parking is a genuine concern, but nothing a conventional solution such as a parking deck or a more creative approach, such as ballpark shuttles from the'burbs, wouldn't solve.
Incorporating a GRTC Transfer Center into the project, as Jones wants to do, would help here.
Not that everyone would be driving or taking a bus to the games. A downtown stadium would produce the rarest of rarities at a Richmond sporting event: walk-up customers.
Naysayers have predicted that a Shockoe Bottom ballpark would be the next white elephant to grace the Richmond landscape, joining such structures as the late and unlamented 6th Street Marketplace. But the marketplace was an act of faith pursued in the face of declining downtown retail trends. This ballpark would join a wave of urban investment in such structures.
The most disturbing aspect of this plan for me is its potential to wreak havoc on the sensitive slave-trade history of Shockoe Bottom. Shockoe Center development should be conditioned on preserving and presenting this history. This project may be the best opportunity to do so.
We've wasted an awful lot of time dreaming about a ball field instead of building one. This Shockoe Bottom proposal offers us the best chance to go the distance.
Contact Michael Paul Williams at (804) 649-6815 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
It is time to get off the can and start building something. LDW sabotaged this for 4 years. We’d be playing baseball right now with the AAA Braves in a newly revitalized downtown. Thanks for getting on board.
MPW - Yes, I pitched the idea of a ballpark in Manchester last Tuesday night at the Times-Dispatch Public Square. Several people came to me afterwards and said they liked the idea, but it is simply too late. I believe the only hope of getting a Manchester ballpark would occur if the Shockoe Center proposal completely fell through.
I wrote this previously:
Everyone reading this should go to Legends Brewery and sit on the deck -drinking a beer is optional;-). Invision a ballpark next to Legends - Yes, the Reynolds foil plant it closing this summer (the assessed value is approximately 12 million dollars). If enough people buy in to this it may become a reality (Right now it’s simply my pipe dream).
squier13 - The construction time frame for Canal Park (in Akron not Toledo) was in 1996 to early 1997 - over 12 years ago. Think about how much the assessed value of a home has increased during that time (mine has more than doubled).
And AA is not Bush League. I posted this on another thread and it applies to you, too:
CommonSense…..You and the rest of the non-baseball people out there know little about the minor league system. A vast majority of current major leaguers played more games at the AA level than the AAA level. No one skips AA - plenty skip AAA completely. When a player makes it to AA in his early 20s, he has arrived. He simply needs a bit more maturation, fine-tuning and one last “test”. Thirty years ago it was a step-wise progression to the majors (A, then AA, then AAA, then the bigs) - not so today. AAA is a holding tank for spare parts. AA is where the young TRUE propects are playing. Bet you’ve never seen a AA game.
It’s a pipe dream to say people will come. I work with over 200 people in by building and only one responded positively to my straw poll. Families from Woodlake, Short Pump and Hanover Tavern are not coming downtown for baseball or anything else- might as well suggest going to downtown Kabul.
Build it or not, I’m a BRAVES fan so my family and I won’t be there.
I can’t believe you quoted Patrick Zohn, “sports facility consultant” as if he had our best interests in mind. Are you the type of shopper who goes to the Mercedes dealer and asks a salesmen if it is a good idea to buy the Maybach 57? “Yes, Mr. Williams, it would be a generational mistake not to buy the ultra-luxury class!“
MPW I’ve got some terrific beachfront in Surry you’d be interested in buying.
Generational mistake, indeed.
NO on this stadium plan, it is a reckless waste of money. At $60+ million it costs more than twice what the next most expensive stadium in the Eastern League costs (Canal Park, Toledo $31 million)
There’s no reason to throw this much money at a bush league baseball franchise. Just because there’s “momentum” behind it doesn’t mean we should follow through. Only a fool would walk onto a car lot and buy the most expensive model on the lot without negotiating a lower price, so why on earth would we do that with this ludicrously expensive stadium?
So we will have to enact yet another tax hike to pay for it, that’s foolish. There are travel warnings all over the internet about Richmond and its meals and lodging taxes, lets not make it worse with a sales tax hike. We’re scaring off enough people as it is.
Where are the teabaggers on this thing? Government bloated and wasteful spending at its worst.
MPW, I agree with Scott, you are selling out the next generation for this foolish project. Disgraceful times, indeed.
I agree with you 100%, Mr. Williams. A stadium on the south bank of the James River would be fantastic, but given the choice of…
a) a stadium in Shockoe
b) a stadium on the Boulevard
c) no stadium at all
I would definitely opt for selection “a.“ Paralysis by analysis, indeed. Let’s get this ball rolling already. Or are we going to pay $$$$ to study the study that studied the study?
MPW, very disappointed in your lack of priorities. What’s more important for Richmond? New and refurbished school buildings or a baseball stadium? Make no mistake about it, you, along with the Times Disgrace, are selling out the future of Richmond children.
MPW I agree with a couple of your points, particularly that a stadium (just) across the river would’ve been nice—and would’ve given South Side & Manchester a boost. But I especially agree with your closing sentence, about Richmond going “the distance.“
The Boulevard was a great place to catch a ballgame in 1978. But Richmond needs to finally move OUT of 1978…and away from 1968, 1958 & 1988! There are exciting possibilities for a move forward with new development in Shockoe Bottom.
Thank you Michael - it is most definitely time to stop talking and make this happen. Inattention and neglect have already wrought havoc on the remnants of history in the Bottom. This development, right now and under the right leadership, can provide a venue for sensitively commemorating the past. And it won’t be just once a year; it could be 80 to 100 times per year.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.



Advertisement