Michael Paul Williams: Terrorism report offends all
Related Info
Virginia terrorist threat: A report from State Police and the Department of Emergency Management
Virginia terror threat? A report from State Police and the Department of Emergency Management says the former Confederate capital and college campuses could be a magnet for extremists.
The Richmond metropolitan area's historically black colleges -- Virginia Union University and Virginia State University -- form a "radicalization node."
Similarly, the presence of historically black Norfolk State University and Hampton University and evangelical Regent University increase the terrorist threat in Hampton Roads.
These assertions are among the findings of a report published last month by the Virginia Fusion Center, a 10-person unit of the Virginia State Police and the state Department of Emergency Management that was created to improve the sharing of anti-terrorism intelligence.
The report's 200-plus pages paint the terrorism threat with such a broad brush that Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, at the behest of the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, is investigating.
"I find the depictions in the report misleading and believe it improperly implicates these fine academic institutions," Kaine said in a statement Tuesday.
"Based on our review of the facts thus far, we see no evidence to suggest that the universities referred to in the assessment pose any particular risk to public safety. Absent specific evidence suggesting such a risk, it is improper to single out these institutions for special mention even with the caveats contained in the report."
Radical Islamists, white supremacists, black separatists, environmental and animal-rights activists, hackers, and anti-abortion and anti-Scientology groups are among more than 50 organizations named as potential threats.
"They seem to have offended everyone from every political stripe," said Mike German, policy counsel for the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office. "Hopefully, everyone will get the message that unfettered intelligence collection eventually will target everyone."
Kent Willis, executive director of the Virginia ACLU, called the report an embarrassment.
"This report, over and over again, draws these broad generalizations and gives examples that don't seem very substantive at all," Willis said.
Willis said such generalizations lead nowhere from an evidence-gathering standpoint.
The report concludes there is no evidence of an imminent terrorist threat, but by naming names, it creates targets.
"It seems to find a terrorist threat in every nook and cranny in Virginia," Willis said. He lamented what he described as the report's racial stereotyping.
Hampton Roads, for instance, is cited as at risk because of its "diverse military population" and its black colleges. And Richmond's history as the former capital of the Confederacy and its large minority population make the region a magnet for race-based extremist groups.
The report also notes a nonviolent protest of a Jamestown 400th-anniversary event by the New Black Panther Party, Black Lawyers for Justice and the American Indian Movement.
"Anyone who is not operating in the dead center of the political mainstream is potentially a terrorist threat," Willis said of the report. Such citations encourage law-enforcement officials to monitor such organizations. "If these organizations are being monitored, that's a chilling effect on free speech."
Or as German, a former FBI agent, said: "It really places the police officers who receive this report in a very untenable position."
Exactly. If you're investigating everyone, you're less likely to catch the real terrorists.
Contact Michael Paul Williams at (804) 649-6815 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Oh, c’mon guys! I can only think that it’s a GOOD thing that MPW has seen some of the problems with the Fusion Center! When the General Assembly passed the laws establishing it, it was opposed by both conservative and liberal groups. Eventually, it was rammed through on the grounds that the Feds required certain odious provisions, or else Virginia would be shut out from Federal information and warnings about terrorism.
Who knows, that left-right cooperation mindset may eventually lead him to think more clearly about firearms!
BTW, be careful what you say here. Not only is the Fusion Center immune to FOI requests, it’s illegal to reveal any information about it.
9/12/01 “why didn’t you connect the dots?“
4/30/09 “we don’t like this picture, stop connecting those dots”?
How soon we forget!
Apologies to Mr Williams, I did not know that Regent University is predominately white. He did kind of sneak it in there with the other black schools and he did not feel the need to mention that it was a predominately white school which led me to believe that this was just another of his normal articles.
While the Virginia Fusion Center’s report which I have neither seen nor read may well be offensive, equal disdain should be heaped on the Federal Department of Homeland Security whose deluded, activist Secretary and staff chose to dishonor the thousands who have sacrificed enormously to serve in our Armed Services by asserting they were “terrorists”. In both cases, there is a great deal of reason for a reaonsable person to conclude that activists within the DHS and Virginia Fusion Center have chosen to further their personal agendas by trying to convince us that those with whom THEY differ pose greater risks than they whom THEY favor.
I am just curious—where is the proof that terrorists are NOT operating in our state colleges (including VCU, which was mentioned also)? Everybody’s quick to poo-poo the report, without having a factual basis for dismissing it. Why would Virginia colleges, out of all the states, be uniquely exempt from terrorist groups operating within them?
Whatever happened to the good old days when all you had to worry about from law enforcement was whether the FBI director was a closet drag queen? Now they’ve got way to much time on their hands and they’re divying us all up into terrorist groups.
As for MPW, it’s VERY amusing to me that he remains relatively silent about what blacks are doing to blacks. It was said a couple of years ago, that if whites did to blacks what blacks did to blacks, there’d be non-stop rioting. As things stand, we only have to live with the threat of rioting.
The report reads like a paranoid delusion from some law enforcement admin that haven’t seen time on the streets in a number of years.
As to thinking something is unbiased because it offends everyone is ridiculous. You can offend EVERYONE with acts that are just egregious. IE: punching grandmas in the face, kicking helpless animals, and saying everyone who disagrees with you (On both the right, and left) are “terrorist”.
“They seem to have offended everyone from every political stripe,“ said Mike German, policy counsel for the ACLU’s Washington Legislative Office.
That sounds like the textbook definition of an unbiased report.
Let’s be honest here, the ACLU and MPW (hate-monger extraordinaire) are trying to cash in on the whining about the Right Wing Extremism Fusion center report that came out 2 months ago in the mid-west. Grabbing onto the Right-Wing tails… what will MPW come up with next?
I hear we’re supposed to have thunderstorms over the next few days - women and minorities to be hit hardest.
Now there’s an angle MPW might want to try.
MPW can’t write an article without addressing someone who’s coming down on the black man.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement