Shockoe Bottom dig turns up 18th century artifacts
ALEXA WELCH EDLUND/TIMES-DISPATCH
Lyle Browning displays a button, sewing pin, bead and piece of pottery that were found at the dig site on North 18th Street in Shockoe Bottom.
Published: October 22, 2009
Updated: October 22, 2009
Building the future of Shockoe Bottom is uncovering bits and pieces of its past.
An archaeological dig at the future site of Cedar Broad, a 200-apartment, four-story development with ground-floor retail spaces, has uncovered remnants of the homes of some of Richmond's early residents.
Lyle Browning of Browning and Associates Ltd. said finding the brick cellar and hearth of a late-18th-century home on the 3-acre site at North 18th and East Broad streets was unanticipated. The property is next to a McDonald's restaurant.
Browning and his crew were expecting to find the remnants of homes built in the 1840s.
"To our surprise, we found no less than two 1769 or thereabouts buildings that were covered over by the 1840s homes," he said beneath a tent covering exposed layers of brick and soil.
Jeffrey Ruggles, a curator with the Virginia Historical Society, said the discovery is significant.
"That is a very early find," he said, noting that it was just within the original Town of Richmond, chartered in 1742 by William Byrd II. "Because that area has been so often rebuilt, there haven't been many findings from that period."
Because the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development backed the loan for the $20 million project, the site was guaranteed an archeological survey.
In August, Browning realized that the artifacts dated well beyond what he had expected to discover as his crew uncovered the remnants of five incarnations of the homes at 317 and 319 N. 18th St.
The property first was sold in 1747 to Jonathan Hopkins, according to deed and tax records. James Murphy, a butcher, purchased a lot in 1769 and built two small structures. After he died in 1793, the houses were demolished.
One of the properties was sold in 1840 to John Clarke, a grocer, and the other in 1842 to Francis Childress, a shoemaker.
Childress would go on to sell to Samuel Reese, a slave trader, in 1862. In 1866, a year after the end of slavery, Clarke sold to Charles McMurray, a former slave trader-turned-grocer.
It became "the most heterogeneous block in the city of Richmond that I've ever seen," Browning said.
"You had free African-Americans living where McDonald's is now, literally next door to slave traders, and you had a factory owner living just on the other side of the block, and a seamstress," he said. "You had the wealthiest people in the city to the poorest all living in one block."
In later years, a small cottage was built on the property and survived until the 1930s, when the area began to decline. The site was a parking lot until the dig began months ago.
After uncovering the bricks from the later structures, Browning's crew found the cellar from Murphy's original home.
The crew dug up brass buttons, sewing pins, beads, buttons and other artifacts that predate the 1840s. Rat tunnels filled with river cobbles, bricks and wine bottles added to the story.
"They literally threw bones into the corner of the room, and when it got too smelly, they put a layer of clay down and sealed it off," he said. "We found jawbones of cows."
The structures and artifacts will be excavated, cleaned and handed over to the state's Department of Historic Resources.
Contact Wesley P. Hester at (804) 649-6976 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Could someone give me an example of what types of useful data we could gather from old buttons and a fireplace? When people talk about understanding our past or learning from history lest we are doomed to repeat it, I think they’re talking about politics and world events, not the ruins of 200 year old fire places.
What will happen to these “finds?“ Warehouse? Will we store the old bricks in a box at a warehouse? A museum? Who cares.
Never knew that archaeology was that big of a deal in this city.
Don’t see what all the noise is about. When the big is over, the anthropologist is going to cover all the holes he dug, and development will continue on the property.
Having a dig should not stop development!!
“Why do we care about relics from a “slave trade” era when we can visit Dafur, Sudan, et al and see “living history” which hasn’t changed much in the past 200 years.“
And why visit any foreign country when we can sit right here in Chesterfield and waste our retirement posting thinly disguised and irrelevant racist remarks on a message board? That’s a lot cheaper than travel!
But to answer the question—as Virginians we care about relics of all sorts because they are part of our history and shape who we are today. We care about the statues on Monument Ave., we care about Shirley Plantation and Colonial Williamsburg. . . . I’d have to assume that the person who posted this is descended from recent immigrants, perhaps even legal ones, and doesn’t have any feel for this place, its history, or its people.
As a lover of history and archaeology, cool. There is a lot to learned from past generations and civilizations.
Ok, I know that this is not an ancient find, but well worth preserving.
I am ashamed at the lack of knowledge. We are currently in the 21st century. the 19th century was the period from 1800- 1899.
Also archaeology is a real job. There has always been the truth of you cannot go forward until you look at where you have been.
In order to fully understand our past we must look at it from all angles. Yes, paper tax documents can tell us who lived where. But they cannot tell us how they lived. What did they eat or drink? What did they use in their homes? What did they get rid of and why?
In the case of this specific spot, it holds a great mystery. Why would freed African Americans be living next door to slave traders?
There are so many possibilities a that a dig like this can uncover for us in the “future”, about a home from 238 years ago. Many folks know about how George Washington lived during that time. But what about the rest of the Virginians? How did they go about their daily lives.
Sure much of this information may not be interesting to a great portion of the world. But to a rare few, it fascinates and intrigues. A find like this is like winning the lottery almost. It is not on the same scale as finding Tutankhamen, but it is still pretty interesting.
Good Grief! Hester wrote, plain as day, the dig was funded because HUD backed the loan for the development. That’s great! Thank goodness it’s been funded at all. Would anyone ask an oncologist why research continues in their field, instead of understanding that there’s room to learn in just about every realm of science? As Howard Maccord was famous for saying, “the results of a dig and that of a bulldozer are about the same- except that the dig produces information that would have been lost otherwise.“ Archaeology isn’t stopping anything from being built, it’s aiding progress! It’s exciting to see researchers continuing to uncover Richmond’s past, and I’m glad the T-D’s taking the time to cover it.
blackbeered…I need you to go back and do the math again.
From the 1700’s until now, is NOT less then 100 yrs.
because it is more fun to stir up subjects and get opinions than to just read the article.
come up with something creative and jog someone’s brain a bit, maybe frustrate someone.
either way, it gets them involved. more comments the better the article! it may not be my express opinion on the matter but it sure makes some people share theirs!
small, you make me laugh HA :-)
“point is that it has already been exhausted, written down, and documented what WAS in this area.“
*****
What’s it to you if they want to dig on their property? If you’re so uninterested why did you read the story and then take the time to share your simple thoughts with the world?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement