Shockoe Bottom dig turns up 18th century artifacts

Shockoe Bottom dig turns up 18th century artifacts

ALEXA WELCH EDLUND/TIMES-DISPATCH

Lyle Browning displays a button, sewing pin, bead and piece of pottery that were found at the dig site on North 18th Street in Shockoe Bottom.

» 20 Comments | Post a Comment

Building the future of Shockoe Bottom is uncovering bits and pieces of its past.

An archaeological dig at the future site of Cedar Broad, a 200-apartment, four-story development with ground-floor retail spaces, has uncovered remnants of the homes of some of Richmond's early residents.

Lyle Browning of Browning and Associates Ltd. said finding the brick cellar and hearth of a late-18th-century home on the 3-acre site at North 18th and East Broad streets was unanticipated. The property is next to a McDonald's restaurant.

Browning and his crew were expecting to find the remnants of homes built in the 1840s.

"To our surprise, we found no less than two 1769 or thereabouts buildings that were covered over by the 1840s homes," he said beneath a tent covering exposed layers of brick and soil.

Jeffrey Ruggles, a curator with the Virginia Historical Society, said the discovery is significant.

"That is a very early find," he said, noting that it was just within the original Town of Richmond, chartered in 1742 by William Byrd II. "Because that area has been so often rebuilt, there haven't been many findings from that period."

Because the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development backed the loan for the $20 million project, the site was guaranteed an archeological survey.

In August, Browning realized that the artifacts dated well beyond what he had expected to discover as his crew uncovered the remnants of five incarnations of the homes at 317 and 319 N. 18th St.

The property first was sold in 1747 to Jonathan Hopkins, according to deed and tax records. James Murphy, a butcher, purchased a lot in 1769 and built two small structures. After he died in 1793, the houses were demolished.

One of the properties was sold in 1840 to John Clarke, a grocer, and the other in 1842 to Francis Childress, a shoemaker.

Childress would go on to sell to Samuel Reese, a slave trader, in 1862. In 1866, a year after the end of slavery, Clarke sold to Charles McMurray, a former slave trader-turned-grocer.

It became "the most heterogeneous block in the city of Richmond that I've ever seen," Browning said.

"You had free African-Americans living where McDonald's is now, literally next door to slave traders, and you had a factory owner living just on the other side of the block, and a seamstress," he said. "You had the wealthiest people in the city to the poorest all living in one block."

In later years, a small cottage was built on the property and survived until the 1930s, when the area began to decline. The site was a parking lot until the dig began months ago.

After uncovering the bricks from the later structures, Browning's crew found the cellar from Murphy's original home.

The crew dug up brass buttons, sewing pins, beads, buttons and other artifacts that predate the 1840s. Rat tunnels filled with river cobbles, bricks and wine bottles added to the story.

"They literally threw bones into the corner of the room, and when it got too smelly, they put a layer of clay down and sealed it off," he said. "We found jawbones of cows."

The structures and artifacts will be excavated, cleaned and handed over to the state's Department of Historic Resources.



Contact Wesley P. Hester at (804) 649-6976 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: shockoe bottom,city of richmond,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by mwa3c on October 22, 2009 at 1:51 pm

so what you are saying is… the wooden houses from the 1700’s that were not built in the city of Richmond, the relics from them would be found down town in the rubble of an 1800’s era foundation?

what about the fires that destroyed the city, the houses that were cleared and rebuilt.. we already know what happened. we know who lived here during that time, we know what it looked like and what clothes people wore during that time period.

point is that it has already been exhausted, written down, and documented what WAS in this area. yeah there could be a few gray areas but it is generally well known.

why beat the already dead bush!

Flag Comment Posted by ziggy on October 22, 2009 at 1:43 pm

The boobs making fun of this article are the probably the same people who failed history class in school. What you might find dull and boring, others find interesting. I hardly doubt any of you naysayers are more interesting than a pile of mud. I thought this article was a nice story that showed some of Richmond’s history from the late 1700’s….which makes it almost 250 years old, not 100 years old like you math majors indicated on your posts. That area of town has a lot of old history buried beneath parking lots, good to see it coming back to life.

Flag Comment Posted by mwa3c on October 22, 2009 at 1:27 pm

Exactly. Now, if we could just realize that the natives to this land had more respect for it than any ANY other race that has traversed it since their demise.. GOD BLESS the Native Americans and their SLAUGHTERED souls.

Give the land back to the Gods!

Flag Comment Posted by ddub28 on October 22, 2009 at 1:24 pm

LOL… this is why nothing significant gets built in Richmond. Too stuck in the past to move forward! I’m sure I could dig up plenty of things in my back yard that would have no interest to me, but some archaeological geek would find interesting… “Woah! An 18th century paperclip!“ Can’t build anything here now.

Flag Comment Posted by blackbeered on October 22, 2009 at 1:22 pm

Look, 100-yr old junk is not history.  Neither is a 120-yr old hovel in Church Hill a landmark.

Why do we care about relics from a “slave trade” era when we can visit Dafur, Sudan, et al and see “living history” which hasn’t changed much in the past 200 years.

We should be going back to the “original” Americans of several thousand years ago. But we want that stain obliterated from history.

Flag Comment Posted by mwa3c on October 22, 2009 at 1:16 pm

I am confidnet that one day, i will read news that actually doesn’t make me shake my head and go “why… just why..“ that day will come. that day.. will come.

Flag Comment Posted by historylover on October 22, 2009 at 1:12 pm

I admire Wahoo2010’s optimism, but so many people fail to see the value of history.  It no only enriches our lives, but it can also enrich our bank accounts.  Historical tourism is still big business in Virginia, and a sound investment in our state’s economy.  And right now that economy needs all the help it can get.

Flag Comment Posted by wahoo2010 on October 22, 2009 at 12:18 pm

I’m confident that one day I will read intelligent Reader Reactions on the RTD.  Anonymity is not a good excuse for ignorance - sorry.

Flag Comment Posted by mwa3c on October 22, 2009 at 11:50 am

I concur. I can find a button and some clay pot parts all over church hill.. who cares, it’s not like we don’t know how it got there and what kind of food the “cave man” ate here local to Richmond…

Flag Comment Posted by blackbeered on October 22, 2009 at 10:25 am

“archaeological dig” ... are you kidding?

With Richmond STILL in the 19th century, we’re talking about “junk” that’s less than 100 years old. 

Find the ancestors of the owners of that junk and fine them for illegally disposing of trash.

And let these “archaeologists” get real jobs ... I hope not one penny of my taxes go to their play.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
Times-Dispatch Shop
 

Advertisement