Suit claims Ashland youth organization mishandled money
Six parents involved with the Ashland Youth Recreation Association Inc. have filed a lawsuit against the organization's officers, directors and commissioners over concerns that the organization was mishandling money and that financial records were being kept from members.
The suit, filed in Hanover County Circuit Court, also alleges that the board illegally changed the association's bylaws to take away voting rights from paying parents and eliminated safeguards such as annual audits.
The association, which was started in 1975, oversees club football, baseball, softball, basketball and cheerleading programs for about 400 children ages 5 to 18. The association is made up of a board of officers, directors and a commissioner for each sport.
The lawsuit, filed in June, asks for a court-ordered inspection of the organization's financial books and records. It asks the court to set aside bylaws that were adopted in December 2007, to establish the time and place for an annual meeting, and to determine which members are entitled to attend that meeting.
A hearing last week was rescheduled for Nov. 4 after a Hanover judge recused himself from the case because he said he personally knows people involved on both sides of the issue.
The suit alleges that current officers and board members "have routinely failed to prepare monthly or annual statements on the financial condition of the corporation as required," and that between 2004 and 2008, the corporation failed to file its annual report with the State Corporation Commission. That led to it losing its corporation status, though that designation was reinstated in 2008.
A home number listed for Sheila Turner, association president and one of the respondents in the case, was not in service yesterday, and she did not return an e-mail seeking comment.
Phillip Hutcheson, an association board member and spokesman for the Ashland Youth Recreation Association, said yesterday that he will not comment on pending litigation. He said the association's lawyer, Joseph D. McCluskey, also has been advised not to comment.
McCluskey did not respond to two voicemails left for him yesterday.
The suit says the current officers and board members failed to "segregate funds by sport or youth activity as required," or "to make financial information available to members of the corporation when requested for a valid purpose."
In addition to the financial issues, the lawsuit alleges that in December 2007, the board of directors wrongfully adopted a new set of bylaws that, among other things, created a "self-perpetuating board of directors, in direct violation of the articles of incorporation of the corporation."
Under the original bylaws, the suit claims, "all members shall have full voting rights in the corporation, including the right to elect officers and directors annually and to vote on amendments to the articles of incorporation." Members were defined in 2003 bylaws as "the parents and guardians of children who have paid their registration fees and participated in the youth activities of the corporation."
Sharon Cage, one of the parents who filed the lawsuit, said the last thing she expected when she signed up her son for sports with the organization "was to end up in Circuit Court."
As a nonprofit organization, the association "should be more transparent and accountable," she said.
Contact Holly Prestidge at (804) 649-6945 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
THE INFORMATION ON THE CASE BEING WITHDRAWN IS AT http://wasdmz2.courts.state.va.us/CJISWeb/CaseDetail.do.
now that I have answered a question of yours, perhaps you could actually answer my questions instead of trying to detract attention from them. You seem to like to discuss it, but decline to actually answer the questions. Why is that?
Jay Johnson, since I don’t see you on our list of AYA Members or the Board, I am puzzled as to how you might reference a settlement or withdrawal and where you might be getting your information. Please let me know.
I see Mrs. Cage is ever villagent . She has responded to my post in only 2 months. Mrs. Cage, you claim to be doing this on behalf of all of the aya members, yet you could only get 3 households to participate? Also you did not mention that you have already settled this case , and the latest comment on the circuit court case is that it is being withdrawn? So your attorney is posting the information on his web site. Will you be billing the children and there parents of the AYA for this as well. Is it not enough that your fruitless charges have already caused aya to rack up an enormous legal bill. Was it also a condition of your settlement that those same people you filed this on behalf of now have to foot your legal bill? As a concerned parent, I don’t think I find your “help” very helpful at all. I just hope that everyone else sees your concern for what it is, too much free time .... adults ruining a childs game.
For a full copy of the complaint (with exhibits attached) which was filed by a few members on behalf of all the members of AYA in Hanover Circuit Court, go to http://www.nancelawfirm.net. Under “news” press “Download the full complaint” and sign onto the secure site. User Name: visitor; Password: access. Press the arrow under “actions” and “download.“ The document will be downloaded to your desktop or download folder within seconds. Any questions, call Charles Nance’s office at 804-213-3007.
An interesting article Ms. Prestidge…a few questions…
your article says 6 parents are listed in the complaint… yet you mention only 1 by name. Could it be that the article would have less value if you mentioned that of the 6 complainants… their are 2 couples listed as individuals, which equates to four families (not as impressive as 6). If you want to list them this way, then I suppose the number of parents that would have a say in this matter was a minimum of 800 parents by using the math in your article. And with the demographics of todays society and multiple parent families, the number could easily be closer to 1200 (since your article decides to mention in passing the six individuals and not four families). So if all the other information was even close to being accurate, then 1/2 of 1 percent of the available parents have saw fit to bring a volunteer youth outfit to court because they did not get their way. I personally find it quite a clutch for a reporter to seek comments from people who are in a pending court case knowing that the proper thing to do is not drag all the bile being dredged up by people who have tried attacking the organization on several different fronts, prior to this… Does the Times dispatch no longer require reporters to actually investigate? I mean surely with so many kids participating, you would think that it would be easy to get commentary , but then again, who really comments on a “ controversy “ that rests soley in the minds of individuals with their own agendas.
Your article makes it sound like this is just a group of concerned parents trying to right a wrong. At least two of the plaintiffs are former board members who have an axe to grind with the organization. I find it somewhat amusing that they are suing the “current” board members for activities which took place last year while they were on the board. Hmmm.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement