Local real estate assessments generally unchanged

Local real estate assessments generally unchanged

Don Long / Times-Dispatch

Charles Harrison has led efforts to get the increase in property tax assessments overturned in Dinwiddie County. He is shown at a 78-acre parcel with high voltage lines being used to pasture cattle.

» 16 Comments | Post a Comment

The real estate slump isn't catching up with local property tax assessments, which are essentially unchanged.

The counties of Henrico, Chesterfield and Hanover saw slight decreases in assessment values, while Richmond had a slight increase.

In most of the nine localities in the region that reassessed this year, overall property values -- and real estate tax bills -- barely changed from their previous levels even though the state Realtors association reported a 14 percent drop in average fourth-quarter sales prices in the Richmond area compared with the year before.

An exception was Dinwiddie County, which did its first reassessment in four years and saw an average 47.4 percent jump in value for existing homes. That startled some residents.

"It's very, very unfair," said Charles Harrison, a 40-year county resident who owns Harrison's Supermarket near the Petersburg city line. "There's swamp land they're saying is three to four times what it's worth. . . .

"I have 8 acres of dry land I've had on the market for three years for $275,000, and [the assessment] went up from $209,000 to $397,000 -- nearly double."

Concern over the rise prompted the Dinwiddie Board of Supervisors to schedule another assessment for later this year.

"People here are very upset, very upset," said Frank M. Moore, who moved back to the county two years ago when he inherited a house and 10 acres on the edge of Fort Pickett.

His assessment jumped from $62,000 to $136,000. "I painted the outside of my dwelling. That's everything I did," Moore said.

Over the past few years, the Richmond region generally has seen double-digit growth in assessed property values. Dinwiddie's tax rolls did not reflect that because the county had not done a reassessment since 2005.

Hopewell, which assesses its real estate tax base every two years, saw a 19.8 percent increase this year. Goochland County's total tax base also increased, but the county assessor could not provide a breakdown of how much existing residential real estate values changed, despite repeated requests.

"The market is down, according to [Realtors data]. But according to the assessor, it is holding its own," said Bill Phillips, a 14-year resident of the Maidens area in Goochland.

He said lots in his subdivision saw a $25,000 increase in land value, which boosted his total assessment by 7 percent.

When Dinwiddie, Hopewell and Goochland are excluded, assessed property values declined 1 percent across the other six localities in the Richmond region that reassessed this year.

The region's strong growth in assessed values before this year has meant rising property-tax bills, even though local elected officials regularly cut the rate at which they calculate taxes.

Even with the softer market, new construction completed last year will boost the total tax base of several localities -- Richmond, for instance will see its total tax base increase 5 percent.

This year, while assessed values on existing homes are generally down, local officials say they are not inclined to increase tax rates. By comparison, Fairfax County proposed raising its rate by 13 percent to $1.04 per $100 of assessed value.

"We're going to make it work with what we've got," Henrico County Manager Virgil R. Hazelett said. "When I look at what they're talking about with tax rates in Northern Virginia, that's just not something you can do to people."



Contact David Ress at (804) 649-6051 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by james on March 08, 2009 at 11:12 am

Unfortunately, the writer of this article wasn’t bright enough to find out how assessments are calculated. Most counties in this area, including Chesterfield, Hanover and Henrico, reassess every year. They do their assessments based on market value. But they don’t do assessments based on the same timeframe as the locality’s fiscal year. The budgets are put together on a July 1 - June 30 year while the assessments are done on a January 1 - December 31 year.

Because of this the localities can’t use the assessments for the current year because they are not done by the time the budget has to be put together. So they use the 2008 assessments to calculate the FY 2009-10 tax rates. The 2008 assessments were done long before the real estate values really fell apart which is why they are about flat. The 2010 assessments will reflect the late 2008 collapse in home values.

Flag Comment Posted by blackbeered on March 08, 2009 at 10:57 am

Until taxpayers unite in revolt [at least in Chesterfield County, throwing Board members under the bus hasn’t been enough], Assessors’ offices will continue to flaunt the law which requires them to assess at “Fair Market Value”.

[Have you tried to talk to your assessor?  I find them to be the most arrogant, obnoxious, under-educated bureaucrats you’ll ever meet; not surprisingly, most of them are former real estate agents ... those non-value-added people that have fed off other people’s money for forty years.]

The technique used in Chesterfield has been to use “stale” sales ... from two and three years ago.  Also, though there may be 300 days supply of unsold homes at an average asking price 20% below assessed value, Chesterfield says that fact is irrelevant.  Only homes that sell can be used in setting assessments ... unless, of course, the county chooses to cite “stale” sales.

So, maybe, the recourse is at the State level.  Let your Rep and Senator know that we need reform.  We have to prevent local communities from “gaming the system.“

I realize, of course, that assessing at “Fair Market Value” doesn’t mean our taxes will go down ... but that’s a battle for another day.

Flag Comment Posted by VA Conservative on March 08, 2009 at 10:46 am

Property taxes should be abolished all together.  You will never own your home as long as the government insists on “rent” money.

Flag Comment Posted by retired on March 08, 2009 at 5:55 am

I do not agree with the first comment about not appealing your assesment. I appealed mine and was turned down by the assessors office but there is another appeal process that has the potential to “correct” their mistake. You are allowed to appeal to a Board of Equalization which is a group of citizens appointed by the court.  This is a “jury of your peers” and I expect to win at that level.  Details on the appeal process are on the county website at checterfield.gov   Not appealing a mistake sends the wrong message…....

Flag Comment Posted by xxxx on March 08, 2009 at 4:47 am

We’re one of the few in Chesterfield who saw a jump in our assessment. Interesting thing is that we also had the house appraised in January and the appraised value dropped by about the same amount the assessment went up.

I realize that to appeal it will get you no where and would cost more money, time and energy then to just suck it up and pay the increase.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on March 08, 2009 at 1:02 am

Yes, imagine that. Our government overlords are in denial about declining property values.  Hmm.. it wouldn’t be because their salaries get paid this way, now would it? 

Try contesting your assessment, if you want a real lesson in Kafka.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement