Ballpark on south bank of James pitched

Ballpark on south bank of James pitched

CB RICHARD ELLIS

The area shaded in blue is the proposed site of a new baseball stadium for Richmond’s planned Eastern League team.

» 97 Comments | Post a Comment

SPECIAL REPORT: Baseball in Richmond

Williams: A museum is better for the bottom

Eastern League not yet ready to identify Richmond's new franchise

The owner of almost 18 acres of prime property on the south bank of the James River is pitching Manchester as the place to play ball in Richmond.

Reynolds Packaging Group has mentioned to city officials informally the possibility of a minor-league baseball stadium in South Richmond.

The stadium site would be part of a 17.5-acre property between the Manchester and 14th Street bridges, with a clear view of the river and downtown skyline.

"How good would a ballpark look there?" asked John T. "Trib" Sutton III, senior vice president of CB Richard Ellis of Virginia, a real estate brokerage that is handling the sale of the property for Reynolds.

Margaret A. Bowen, vice president of human resources at Reynolds, said she pointed out the property and its potential as a stadium site to Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones and key aides David Hicks and Suzette P. Denslow while at an unrelated event last week overlooking the river and the property from the 24th floor of the SunTrust building in downtown Richmond.

Bowen also mentioned her experience in Pittsburgh, where the Pirates' major-league franchise opened PNC Park in 2001 with a view of the city skyline and Allegheny River.

The event, introducing then-prospective Chief Administrative Officer Byron C. Marshall to the local business community, occurred the day before the collapse of a proposal to build a stadium in Shockoe Bottom.

However, Richmond officials say they didn't consider the casual conversation a pitch for a new stadium site and that they don't have any formal proposal to consider.

"Unequivocally, we are not considering any proposal for a baseball stadium on that site," Tammy D. Hawley, the mayor's press secretary, said yesterday.

CB Richard Ellis is making its first pitch for potential buyers of the South Side property next week. The brokerage also is handling the sale of another Reynolds site, a key property on the downtown Canal Walk.

CB Richard Ellis representatives say they already have shown the 6-acre property on the north side of the James to 12 potential buyers and have scheduled private tours for an additional 10. Reynolds will ask for proposals from as many as 30 potential buyers later this month and could select a purchaser by Labor Day.

Reynolds currently packages and distributes Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil in a series of buildings that lie over part of the Kanawha Canal and abut the Haxall Canal, which extends up the river to Brown's Island. The complex stands between the two sections of the Canal Walk that Richmond long has sought to develop as a tourist attraction.

"It's central to completing that vision," said Robert A. Dirom III, first vice president at CBRE.

Bowen is a member of the board of directors of Venture Richmond, a nonprofit organization that advocates riverfront development and operates a canal boat on a portion of the Kanawha that currently is open. She hopes the development of the property will allow people to walk the two historic canals without detouring around the industrial property, as they do now.

"The two canals will never physically meet -- they never did before," she said. "It creates a connected walkway."

Reynolds Packaging, now a division of Rank Group, plans to close its operations on both sides of the river this year. The closings, currently envisioned in the quarter that began yesterday, will cost about 490 employees their jobs.

The company, through CBRE, has been talking to city officials and other interested economic development organizations about how to develop the properties in ways that are consistent with the new Downtown Master Plan, which for the first time encompasses the Manchester area of South Richmond.

Hawley said the city doesn't generally comment on impending real estate transactions, but she acknowledged the importance of the master plan in considering potential redevelopment of the property on the north side of the river along the Canal Walk.

"Reynolds always had been a good corporate citizen," she said. "I would anticipate no less than some eye toward the [city's] best interests and best use of the space."

Charlie Diradour, a Fan District businessman who advocates keeping baseball on North Boulevard, said yesterday that he wasn't surprised that the South Richmond property, formerly owned by Alcoa Corp., is being mentioned for a stadium site.

"I have been informed all along the way that if the Bottom site didn't work out, the Alcoa site would be the next target for a baseball stadium," he said yesterday.

Diradour, who plans to announce a new Web site called Friends of Richmond Baseball at a press conference today in front of The Diamond, said the real issue is who would buy the property and who would pay to build a stadium there.

"The question always has been a question of money," he said. "Who is going to build the stadium?"



Contact Michael Martz at (804) .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by stevew999 on July 03, 2009 at 11:17 am

“Minor league baseball needs to come back to Richmond and simply being cheaper to renovate the Diamond will not draw good talent or a good fan base.“

so tell me jerrylinda, why exactly does baseball need to come back, and at what expense? is it in the city charter?

and your referring to opposing posters as “their kind” sounds like you’ll be getting out the bedsheets and going for a ride tonight

Flag Comment Posted by jerry78linda on July 03, 2009 at 11:02 am

I read both of those articles from Style.  According to both writers, looks like everyone involved in city council needs to be fired, put in new people who know how to run a city.

Come on, is it that bad?  So exactly who is running this train wreck of a city?  I work downtown and I love it.  I walk the canal walk, I eat at the great restaurants here, I guess I’m not seeing the crash and burn problem.  Maybe the tourists don’t see it either.

I would still love to see a new ball park.

Flag Comment Posted by jerry78linda on July 03, 2009 at 10:31 am

Like I said…..pessimists.  Their kind are the reason things “don’t” get done.

Flag Comment Posted by stevew999 on July 03, 2009 at 9:53 am

weellllll
i posted early in this string, commenting that this seems to be noting more than a realtor attempting to hype some property to sell it.

unfortunately, i forgot to check the do not annoy me box and was slammed with follow ups.

seems like most arguments boil down to…
who has more trees and more crime… the trees seem evenly spread, the per population crime seems to be favor the city over the burbs - probably been at least a dozen assaults and murders in the city since the lone shooting in short pump…

who’s going to pay for it? - it’ll never get done without public financing, especially for infrastructure improvements. and since it would require more richmond policing, and since richmond is understaffed and can’t afford to hire more officers… etc etc

and don’t give me the bunk about if you build it they will come, just check into cleveland and the rock hall of fame and see how that revitalized their downtown initially, but since has leveled off and begun a steep downward decline.

i still say, if 500,000 was the total attendance for the braves at their peak, then probably well less than 100,000 people actually attended the games, probably more in the neighborhood of 50,000 - taking into account season tickets, impulse buying folks who attended more than one game during the season, corporate purchases unused but counted as tickets sold etc etc etc.

is the enjoyment of that size an audience enough to continue bankrupting a city the size of richmond? probably not. there are more important things to do with tax dollars.

this city needs to be rebuilt from the ground up - schools, safety, demolition and gentrification. it needs a new foundation to give it a structure and a base, financially and population wise. it doesn’t need wild speculation and flights of fancy. a few brews and a game doesn’t do anything to improve the quality of the city or the quality of life for most of its residents.

starting with a stadium project and expecting it to turn things around is shortsighted. it’s going to make the city top heavy, no base, no foundation, no future, just more taxes to drive more folks away

Flag Comment Posted by jerry78linda on July 03, 2009 at 9:45 am

Location, location, location, 3 rules of real estate.  This spot on the James overlooking the river and the city makes a huge difference than the one in Shockoe where it was in a hole and the one on the Blvd where it’s drawing days are over.

Minor league baseball needs to come back to Richmond and simply being cheaper to renovate the Diamond will not draw good talent or a good fan base.  But watching a game over looking the river and those city lights is by far the best suggestion I have seen so far.  I really hope all the pessimists out there don’t kill this one to.

Flag Comment Posted by markiemarkwine on July 03, 2009 at 9:27 am

.....of course it would be a great place for a ballpark, after the buildings are torn down, environmental regulations are met, a buyer is found, financing is secured. The broker is just talking his book.  Look folks, if the Davenport study of the Bottom proposal showed no net revenue benefit to Richmond in a best case scenario, and financial losses in a worst case, why would City officials support the Manchester site.

Flag Comment Posted by DickTracy on July 03, 2009 at 6:24 am

Ditto: RMA cannot even manage its parking decks properly which are falling apart in places—I disagree though with the term thinking “big”—
It is “big” thinking in Richmond which got us the ugly statues by Depasquale—of the “Brave” at the Diamond and of
the talented and famous Arthur Ashe who
deserves better than what is on Monument Avenue. It is thinking big which got us the 6th street Market Place disaster—and the ill-used canal walk, etc. No, Richmond needs to think smart; it needs to stop trying to be
something it is not. If the Diamond (which I think is of great commercial value)is not renewed without RMA thank
you—then the Manchester is even better—Great views of the City; popular with
tourists because of Tredegar across the way, canal walk, River park, and a venue
to 14th street bridge and the slip—Now
that is thinking smart—as sports—Remember the thing in Shockoe was not about baseball or sports—that was a come on—it was a real-estate gamble for developers that is all…

Flag Comment Posted by Hate_Richmond on July 03, 2009 at 5:47 am

I’m enjoying reading the comments on here and not being actively involved in the debate. It seems like it’s a lot more fun.

I will add this one thing, though: Richmond is afraid to dream big, so this Manchester site will never get off the ground. That’s why I’m not getting my hopes up for it. People who poo-poo this site mention crime, blight or accessibility (all problems that aren’t really a problem). That’s not the real problem with this site. The real problems with this whole baseball thing, and why I’m resigned to the fact that we’ll never get affiliated baseball here are apathy, dysfunction and ignorance. Those are the real killers of this region.

Any renovation of the Diamond will need to have the stipulation that the RMA get out of the business of managing the property. They (along with the Braves) are the reason that the building went downhill.

Flag Comment Posted by xxxx on July 03, 2009 at 3:11 am

Crime is everywhere so saying Short Pump or Midlothian is a better place to put a ball field is a moot issue. 

It needs to be accessible by all and by putting it in Midlothian or Short Pump those in the east end and Hanover will need to travel a good distance to get there which I would think will make it less likely for those folks to attend on a regular basis thereby lowering the potential attendence base. 

Families aren’t the only folks who go to ball games, I went to more games as a 20 something single person then I have with my family.  In addition Richmond and the East End have families as well so using that as a reason to put a ball field in Midlothian or Short Pump isn’t a valid one.

And finally and the most important for me is that as a long time Midlothian resident (25 years)near the village, I would prefer it not be placed at my back door.  I’ve seen too much sprawl occur in this area and it’s turned into a concrete jungle with buildings on every inch of land and traffic lights every 1/8-1/4 mile, it’s past time to stop building.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement