New construction slow to pick up in the region
Eva Russo / Times-Dispatch
Angel Ramos and his crew install natural-gas service for new homes in Watermark in Chesterfield County.
Published: July 14, 2009
Updated: July 14, 2009
If building-permit activity is a true indicator of economic recovery, the Richmond region has a ways to go.
New construction remains at a crawl in the area's major localities.
The slowdown has afforded Chesterfield County, the region's largest bedroom community, some relief from the rapid residential influx of years past but is making the county's effort to balance its population with commercial growth more challenging.
Henrico County is seeing the same trends but with the luxury of an already strong commercial base.
So far this year, 376 building permits for new homes have been issued in Chesterfield, a 69 percent decline compared with the same time period in 2008. In Henrico, 267 home permits have been issued this year, a 51 percent decline from the same period in 2008.
Richmond and Hanover County have seen similar trends, although on a smaller scale.
"In the last year, we definitely saw a reduced trend in residential construction, and that's no surprise," said William D. "Bill" Dupler, Chesterfield's director of building inspections.
Even so, Dupler said, the number of businesses coming into the county remains relatively steady given the economic climate.
"We had a pretty strong year in terms of commercial, including the retail sector," he said, adding that work on the large-scale Watkins Centre development in western Chesterfield had much to do with that.
To date this year, the estimated construction costs for new commercial buildings in Chesterfield has been $60.8 million. Last year at this time, it was $120.2 million.
In Henrico, commercial construction costs have totaled $26.6 million so far compared with $116.6 million at the same time last year.
"Activity levels certainly aren't where they were, but we're currently seeing some revived interest in commercial," Henrico Planning Director Joe Emerson said.
Said Dupler: "I think the commercial sector is finding construction. If they have the financing lined up to do it, the prices are very attractive, and that's encouraging construction."
To speed up the recovery and encourage business growth, Chesterfield is exploring the idea of slashing planning fees for commercial projects.
If approved, the measure would reduce charges for office, commercial and industrial development applications -- which could run as high as $8,200 -- to just $200 until June 30 next year.
In November, Henrico decreased waterand sewer-connection fees for the same reason.
E. Wilson Davis Jr., Chesterfield's economic-development director, said there's promise that the county could land some major office and manufacturing additions in coming months.
"We're working with some nice clients and seeing some good activity," he said. "If some things fall into place and we see some additional shifts in the economy, I think we're in a very good position."
Chesterfield Planning Director Kirk Turner said he hopes housing soon will show similar signs of life.
"I'd like to see residential pick up. To my way of thinking, a 2 percent residential growth rate is healthy," he said, noting that a sharp decline in home-occupancy permits is evidence the county is well behind that pace.
Emerson said residential permits should pick up quickly when the economy turns around.
"As far as new rezonings for residential cases, we're not seeing those and haven't for some time," he said. "But we do have a number of projects already approved and ready."
Henrico building official Greg Revels said building permits shouldn't be considered the first sign of a rebound, as developers and builders will invest only after they regain confidence from elsewhere.
"It looks to me like things have leveled off," he said. "It's kind of like the market has reached equilibrium. You hear signs of optimism, and hopefully by the end of the year we'll see a swing back in the other direction and things will start improving more noticeably."
Contact Wesley P. Hester at (804) 649-6976 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Given the current job market, I imagine that there are a lot of US citizens who will be more than willing to work in the construction industry.. BTW..from what I understand, the hispanic workers aren’t actually working for “less” than minimum wage.. I believe that they are hired for their work ethic in many cases(trying not to be too stereotypical.. but their reputation is one of hard work). Also, we do actually have legal hispanic citizens.. so we shouldn’t assume that every person we see is illegal. Oh.. and much of the crime perpetrated in relation to the illegal alien population is perpetrated against them.. since they often have large amounts of cash and are reluctant to report crimes.
Shorter Welshwoman
“Get rid of all the Mexicans!“
Oh good, construction is rising again and the illegal immigrants who bring crime and poor social skills and habits will be swarming us again. How delightful.
MikeT.. I sure hope you are right..lol.. I have 145 acres straddling Cumberland Buckingham.. I would take 3500/acre..haha.
Unfortunately, when the “easy credit” market dried up, demand for homes went down because people (who probably weren’t good risks for loans) were no longer in the housing market, and the amount of house people could afford who could get credit went down. Because people “could” get approved or approved for more.. the demand for these higher value homes went up..People bought into the “buy the biggest you can because it is your best investment” that the realty community was selling.. and for quite a while it was true.. as demand was strong while credit was easy.. the demand outpaced the supply in many areas leading to the infamous “bubble.“
MikeT is right that there is still a need for some new construction, but scale of these homes should be more realistic.. Counties like the high value homes because per acre it gets them more revenue.. but unfortunately, the pool of people that can afford them has shrunk.. They need to reset their thinking to the new economic situation and not impede reasonable growth.
“Builders aren’t causing sprawl—the counties are by not letting builders build reasonably priced homes.“
You’re half right. The builders aren’t totally innocent, though, they love zoning regulations that let them build houses that are as big as possible to increase their profits. The counties need to zone for higher density, even in single family areas.
Compare a house built in 1955 to a hosue built in 2005. The 1950s house probably has three small bedrooms, a living room, a dining room, a small kitchen and 1 1/2 baths on a quarter acre lot. The neighborhood has sidewalks and is close by to a shopping center, and no more than a 5-10 minute drive into the city with traffic.
The house built in 2005 has five bedrooms, four bathrooms, a great room, a living room, a den, a giant kitchen, a rec-room basement…and on and on, on a one or two acre lot. The neighborhood has no sidewalks, its a 30 minute drive into the city if you’re lucky, and pretty far to the grocery store, too. It is all because of a change in zoning regulations.
If you think that makes the stormwater regulations a good idea, ask yourself why the local governments are fighting the regulations harder than the home builders.
Again, people posting without knowing what the bleep they’re talking about.
Why do you people think these county officials are so concerned about the housing slowdown? They know if you stop building, county revenues and private sector jobs collapse and the entire county suffers. Dupler says commercial is coming around in Chesterfield but commercial projects are 50% below this time a year ago. That’s not coming around. The 50 percent drop is a big reason why housing has fallen off so far. Business doesn’t come if it sees no growth.
Someone mentioned Buffett. He’s a great financier but he hasn’t got a clue about community planning. Take it from Kirk Turner, who’s an expert in planning where Buffett isn’t. Chesterfield needs housing.
The Richmond area won’t turn around until guys like Joe Emerson figure out that the $300,000 home is no longer the norm. Henrico is so far behind where they were last year because they haven’t figured that out. Builders aren’t just going to Fort Lee. Caroline County, New Kent and even Amelia counties are seeing housing growth because Henrico and Chesterfvield are driving builders out.
Builders aren’t causing sprawl—the counties are by not letting builders build reasonably priced homes. And speaking of sprawl, just wait for the stormwater regulations the RTD wrote about yesterday that Kaine is ramming home for the enviroidiots who control him. You want to see sprawl? Traffic congestion? Auto emission pollution? When Kaine puts this crap into effect, Buckingham County will become a suburb of Richmond because that’s the only place where a developer will be able to buy land at a reasonable price so that development at a reasonable price can take place.
ddub 28, the suburbs are going to die in the next 10-20 years. Once gas reaches $8, $9, $10, and with the death of easy credit, the suburbs will become the new ghettoes and the areas close to and in downtown will be the most desireable places to live. A possible exception are the 1950s-style suburbs right outside the city, but the day of the McMansion is done. It is already starting to happen in the fringe exurbs (Magnolia Green, anyone?)
The last thing we need are more sprawling suburban, cookie-cutter neighborhoods in the Richmond region. So this is actually a good thing. Built up, not out.
It was just last week that Warren Buffet said the recession will never end until homebuilders stop building new houses. This all started with collapsing home prices and won’t end until demand catches up with supply. I understand the Fort Lee area is a special circumstance. But, what is the excuse elsewhere? How do local banks justify making more residential construction loans?
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement