Public services at risk around Va., survey says

» 8 Comments | Post a Comment

Take $60 million out of Chesterfield County's $1.2 billion budget, and these are some of the things that could disappear:

  • jobs for 225 teachers and 32 school resource officers, 30 firefighters and 30 police officers;

  • four libraries and a couple of fire stations; and

  • 10 government and public school departments, including health, planning, finance and budget.

And then take away 2 percent of the pay for school employees who still have jobs.

Chesterfield is painting a grim picture to prepare the public for an anticipated $60 million shortfall in next year's budget for general government and schools. And that's before other potential cuts in state aid to localities when the General Assembly and a new governor adopt a two-year budget next spring.

"There have to be changes in what and how services will be delivered to the community," said Allan M. Carmody, director of budget and management.

But Chesterfield is far from alone. More than 100 Virginia localities say they will be less able to provide public services in the budget year that begins July 1 than they can now, according to a survey released recently by the Virginia Municipal League and Virginia Association of Counties.

The localities will have less federal stimulus money to fill the gaps created by declining local and state revenues, but demand for services is increasing in a recession that has eliminated thousands of jobs in the region.

"You can see what the tsunami is for local governments," said Neal Menkes, director of fiscal policy at the municipal league. "We're crashing, the state's crashing. . . . It's all going to fall on local governments as to how we're going to provide these services."

The survey of 136 localities before Labor Day documents declining real estate and personal property values, and predicts a decline in local general fund revenue of 2.9 percent next year. More than 75 percent of the localities surveyed said they will not be able to deliver the same level of service to the public because they've already taken the less painful options, such as freezing salaries or delaying construction projects, to balance their budgets this year.

. . .

While the worst recession since the Depression is easing nationally, local officials believe the worst is yet to come for them.

"Next year's budget is going to be extremely lean," Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones told a Town Hall audience last week in response to a question about increased benefits for retired city employees. "We have cut the flesh. Next year's budget may cut down in the bone."

Local governments rely heavily on real estate taxes, which are slower to recover than other forms of revenue, such as sales and income taxes. They also depend on money from the state, especially to pay for public education, and Virginia's general revenues fell 7.4 percent in the first quarter of this budget year. Henrico County relies on real estate taxes and state aid for 70 percent of its revenue, for example.

Local governments also are bracing for potentially big increases in their costs, from the soaring demand for human services to higher rates for teacher and other employee retirement plans.

Henrico and Amelia counties, for instance, are handling a fast-rising demand for food stamps -- up 45 percent since July 2008 in Henrico and 50 percent in Amelia. The food-stamp relief is federal, but it's administered for the state by local social-services departments.

"There are people using our services that had never ever set foot in a social-services agency," said George T. Drumwright Jr., deputy county manager for community services in Henrico.

Localities are concerned about rate increases recommended by the Virginia Retirement System for local employees and teachers, since the county currently pays both the employee and employer shares of the bill. Chesterfield estimates that the higher rates for 3,433 employees could cost the county an additional $6 million to $8 million next year. The bill could be even bigger for the county's 6,100 teachers and other school professionals with a potential increase of $10 million to $12 million for teacher retirement plans. The school system also funds retirement plans for about 1,100 support staff.

In Henrico, Finance Director John A. Vithoulkas estimates the price tag for recommended retirement plan rate increases at $10 million for teachers alone, and he's not happy about it.

"It is an issue I think that will have a significant impact on local budgets throughout the commonwealth," he said.

Michael L. Edwards, deputy director of the Virginia Association of Counties, said he agrees that the retirement rate increase will hurt localities, which generally pay more than half the cost of teacher pensions. "It's going to be brutal," he said.

The view isn't so dire at VRS, where Executive Director Robert P. Schultze predicts that a big rate increase for state employee and teacher pensions will never make it through the General Assembly.

"I just don't think the General Assembly is going to increase the rates," he said last week. "Where are they going to get the money?"

On the other hand, the rates that the VRS board recommends Nov. 19 for local employee retirement plans will be binding. Those plans are better funded than the plans for teachers and state employees, so the increase is likely to be small, Schultze said. "But I do expect a rate increase."

. . .

The biggest concern among local officials is how much money they will receive from the state to pay for public education in kindergarten through 12th grade.

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine will propose his final two-year budget Dec. 19, with recommendations for the biennial process of revising the benchmarks for those education costs and the state's share of paying for them.

The legislature approved a proposal by the governor this year that could cost localities more than $750 million in additional funds for public education. Instead of nearly $900 million, the change in methodology for reimbursing localities would fall to $138.6 million.

"We haven't seen what methodology is going to be accepted by the governor and the General Assembly," said David Myers, assistant superintendent for business and finance in Chesterfield schools.

Also, localities won't have as much federal stimulus money to fill the holes and avoid massive layoffs, as Chesterfield did this year. The county used about $20 million in this year's budget to avoid laying off hundreds of school employees. It had counted on about the same amount for next year's budget, but nearly $3.9 million of those funds would be used instead to help fill the state's budget shortfall in this fiscal year under a plan proposed by Kaine in September.

Henrico would lose about $2.8 million in stimulus money for next year's budget under that proposal, though the county isn't using any stimulus money on operating expenses. Richmond and Hanover County would receive about $1.1 million less in stimulus money for next year's budget.

. . .

None of the other big localities in the region has gone as far as Chesterfield in predicting what next year's budget will look like.

Hanover is preparing a budget presentation to its Board of Supervisors on Nov. 10, said Deputy County Administrator Joseph P. Casey, and county agencies have been told to produce plans to cut costs 5 percent. Richmond officials have yet to discuss the effect of state cuts in this year's budget, let alone next year's.

However, real estate assessments are down throughout the region, especially for commercial properties in former hot spots such as Innsbrook, where Henrico officials predict vacancy rates of more than 30 percent. Vithoulkas estimates that the county will lose more than $20 million in real estate tax revenue next year because of a 6.5 percent drop in assessed values.

Richmond is predicting an overall reduction of about six percent in taxable real estate values next year, or about $12 million in revenue, according to Assessor James D. Hester.

In Chesterfield, the county is predicting a reduction of about $20 million in all revenues, including personal property, which has dropped in value by 8 percent. Like other localities, the county depends heavily on state money, which accounts for about 20 percent of the government budget and half of the school district's general fund.

Meanwhile, local government fiscal consultant James J. Regimbal Jr. calls the next two-year state budget "a train wreck about to happen." The state is running out of stimulus money and other one-time fixes to fill the budget gaps, and the growing demand on the Medicaid program for the poor is expected to gobble up whatever new money is available.

"There are no promising signs for local government in terms of state revenues," Carmody said in Chesterfield.



Contact Michael Martz at (804) 649-6964 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: henrico county,hanover county,city of richmond,chesterfield county,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by kczyblnd41 on November 01, 2009 at 2:28 pm

durn i thought Obama was gonna fix all these problems and get jobs with his stimilous bill? what happened? and if kaine keeps messing with PMUSA they will leave too and then what will the richmond area do? PMUSA employees themselves gave over 23 million to charities in and around the richmond area!!! not to mention the taxes from them! So keep up the good work dems!!!  this is change you can believe in alright!

Flag Comment Posted by Scott Burger on November 01, 2009 at 10:41 am

Note to Mayor Jones:

Please rip up the ridiculous Center Stage contract and do NOT pay the HALF MILLION DOLLAR public subsidy.
I would rather have functioning neighborhood services than more white elephant downtown mess.
The Times Disgrace and other corporates should never have cheerleaded the Center Stage disaster. It is mockery of any sense of financial conservatism.
SHAME!

Flag Comment Posted by Jack on November 01, 2009 at 10:38 am

Look for large tax increases and higher assessments on your homes. Politicians especially those in Chesterfield are not about to give up their empires.

The present BOS in Chesterfield who promised “a new direction” is still on the same road, going the same direction only at a faster speed.

Flag Comment Posted by dc on November 01, 2009 at 10:31 am

Chesterfield residents should be worried about their school superintendent. He over-shot the budget by $54 million last year and had his butt saved by ‘stimulus money’. He should have taken that cue and made adjustments this year. Did he? No. He overshoots the budget again in the hopes that Obama Bucks will, once again, save the county’s schools. Chesterfield residents should take a good, hard look at the real problem; Poor management of their schools.

Flag Comment Posted by DarnYankee on November 01, 2009 at 9:20 am

Right on J-Reb. They so-called professional managers who oversee our localities’ operations and budgets would rather threaten the education of our children and safety of our communities than see a reduction in their fiefdoms.  A group of conservative citizens needs to sit down with their locality’s budget when it is proposed, and identify cuts that could be made to bring that budget into line with their revenue projections.

Flag Comment Posted by J-Reb on November 01, 2009 at 9:00 am

There are literally hundreds of useless “social service” programs that could be cut or eliminated, but as usual our fearless leaders always propose cuts in schools, parks, police and fire protection.  That’s how they hope to maintain political support for their obscenely bloated bureaucracy.  It usually works too.

Flag Comment Posted by BrunswickStew on November 01, 2009 at 1:24 am

This is about the only thing that’s good about a recession in the economy. It forces state and local government to shed weight and make do with less. It has become all to common for local and state government to add far too many un-needed positions. It’s ridiculous to pay people $50,000 to $100,000 plus per year with full benefits for doing minimal tasks such as answering a phone,sorting mail and making appointments etc…This work at one time was done by the elected county officials themselves instead of hiring extra staff like the assistant to the assistant or the deputy and assistant deputy blah blah. These kind of hardly working jobs need to go for good! Try going out and making a living in the real world like most people have to do and see how you like it.

Flag Comment Posted by mikeyt on November 01, 2009 at 1:40 am

We can only hope that these dire revenue estimates will not only force the counties to finally cut fat from their budgets, but when the economy does eventually turn around it will encourage them to put extra revenue away and not put it into frivilous programs like government-run recycling (Chesterfield) or excessive land purchases (Goochland).

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement