Jones looks to tighten Richmond policy on take-home cars for officers

Jones looks to tighten Richmond policy on take-home cars for officers

File / Alexa Welch Edlund / Times-Dispatch

Richmond Police Officer Christel Winston stands by one of 40 new Richmond Police take-home cars at a 2007 press conference.

» 20 Comments | Post a Comment

Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones said yesterday that he's committed to tightening a policy that allows police officers to drive their vehicles home even if they live well outside the city limits.

City Council members blasted the policy as excessive after learning this week that take-home vehicles have been authorized for officers who live as far out as Fredericksburg, Jetersville and Bumpass.

"I think the thing that we need to acknowledge is there is a problem," Jones said. "We certainly are concerned about our police cars being in distant localities."

The mayor said he expects to work quickly with Police Chief Bryan T. Norwood to revise the policy so it focuses on keeping police vehicles in the city. Jones said he believes that presence helps to deter crime in the neighborhoods where the officers live.

"The gray area is what's going on outside the city," he said.

Councilwoman Reva M. Trammell, chairwoman of the council's public-safety committee, agrees that changes are needed.

"The policy in place is not fair, especially when officers are not going to get a [pay] step increase" in the next fiscal year, she said.

The police department has 261 marked and unmarked vehicles assigned for take-home use, according to a May 4 memo from Norwood to Trammell. The memo lists the number of vehicles by the officers' home ZIP codes.

Based on its review, Trammell's office has estimated that perhaps two-thirds of the vehicles regularly leave the city. Many are driven to Henrico and Chesterfield counties, but others go to Powhatan County, Providence Forge, Montpelier, Columbia, Amelia Courthouse, Studley, Maidens, Williamsburg, Aylett, Petersburg and Moseley.

Norwood responded to questions about the take-home policy with a brief statement that his department was working with the city administration and council "to meet budget mandates and provide public safety to the city of Richmond."

The police department technically has separate policies for marked and unmarked take-home vehicles, and both were approved in 2007 by then-Chief Rodney Monroe. Take-home assignments are made at the chief's discretion but are intended in part for on-call officers.

In March, Norwood tightened the rules for marked vehicles by prohibiting travel outside the city, instead of outside the region, unless approved by a supervising major. He did not offer clarification.

Councilman Chris A. Hilbert has estimated that allowing police vehicles to leave the city could be costing taxpayers as much as $600,000 per year. Trammell said she thinks the figure is higher.

Hilbert agreed the policy needs tightening but said certain situations may justify take-home vehicles for officers living outside the city. But in those cases, he said, the city should limit how much it contributes.

"People can live wherever they want to live, but you can't rely on the taxpayers of the city of Richmond to subsidize your commute," he said.

Because of budgetary constraints, the Henrico County Division of Police has been phasing out its policy of assigning take-home vehicles to officers who live outside the county, said Lt. Doug Perry, a police spokesman. To qualify, officers have had to live in localities contiguous to Henrico.

In Chesterfield, take-home vehicles are assigned to officers who live in the county, but at least two exceptions have been made for officers living elsewhere, said Ann P. Reid, a spokeswoman for the Chesterfield Police Department. An official with the Hanover County Sheriff's Office did not respond to questions about its policy.



Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: richmond police department,reva trammell,dwight jones,city of richmond,chris hilbert,bryan norwood,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by SmithM on May 10, 2009 at 10:28 am

The take home car program is a benefit to the citizens and officers alike. If the cars stay in the City, the citizens benefit. If they are taken out of the City, the officers benefit. Each officer makes a conscious decision as to where they reside. If they choose to live in the City, they should be rewarded with a car…. That is how almost every other locality does it. In Henrico, it is my understanding, that you have to live in the County to receive a car….the only people who get to take it out of the County are the bosses and some old timers who were grandfathered in….  Somebody out to check into where other County employees are taking the cars to!

I can appreciated the fact that the officers want to have their own car…I imagine the responsibility of having their own car leads them to keeping it cleaner and better maintained. 

Why not assign every officer a car…that seems to be a good compromise, and the officer can be held accountable for the car easier than a car that is always being driven by “the next guy, or the last guy”

Flag Comment Posted by dc on May 10, 2009 at 8:28 am

Before I start my rant, I would like to say that I am VERY supportive of our police department. The lack of respect they receive from the criminals they deal with on a daily basis compared to the compensation they are paid, is pretty bad. However, as a city of Richmond taxpayer, I am very upset that officers living outside of the city limits are allowed to take vehicles home.

NO city-owned vehicles should be allowed out of the city limits unless on official business. Period! NO exceptions. Those vehicles belong to the city of Richmond taxpayer, not the department or the employee. Taking a vehicle home should be an incentive to reside within the community that you serve. This policy should not be limited to police. Other city employees should follow the same principals. That means no city school busses at the Ukrops in Henrico County. I don’t care if they are waiting for students to get out of class. You DO NOT take OUR school busses out of the city limits just because you want a 3 piece snack from the Ukrops Cafe.

Flag Comment Posted by LexTalionis on May 10, 2009 at 6:01 am

Mayor Jones should step up to the plate and give up his shiny big SUV and police security detail. How much is THAT costing the taxpayers?? Who can better afford a vehicle? Who is a better deterrent to crime…a police officer, or the mayor?

Flag Comment Posted by my2cent on May 09, 2009 at 7:48 pm

I have been with RPD over 15 years, and never had a take home car. The ones that do brag about how much far they live out of the city, and the money they save in gas. They don’t pay taxes on it either, because of the law enforcement loophole with the tax code. I would be angry to if I were a city taxpayer. The cars should not leave the city period. No crime or life has ever been saved because of the fifteen minutes it saved an on-call officer from responding to the city. On-duty officers handle everything anyway.  The city also pays one hour of overtime for callouts, half hour each way. So why do they need a “take home” car. All of us can easily afford to live in the city, but no way I am sending my children to city schools. Just my two cent. Hurray for Mayor Jones.

Flag Comment Posted by Hot Stuff on May 09, 2009 at 7:37 pm

I posted the median HOUSE VALUE, not INCOME!

Flag Comment Posted by 23230 on May 09, 2009 at 7:07 pm

Both home prices and rent are cheaper in Fredericksburg than in Richmond. Someone below posted median income stats. That is different. Do some home shopping between the 2 places—forget the median income data.

Flag Comment Posted by Hot Stuff on May 09, 2009 at 5:10 pm

Pleasssssssse, houses are a whole lot cheaper in the city of richmond than in Williamsburg or Fredericksburg!

Estimated median house or condo value in 2007 Williamsburg: $427,735 (it was $182,000 in 2000)

Estimated median house or condo value in 2007 Fredericksburg: $316,024 (it was $134,500 in 2000)

Estimated median house or condo value in 2007 Richmond: $203,900 (it was $87,400 in 2000)

http://www.city-data.com/city/Virginia.html

Flag Comment Posted by mikeyt on May 09, 2009 at 4:06 pm

tripower… what I meant was the city doesn’t give private builders the opportunity to build affordable housing. These guys make $40,000 a year on average. A $200,000 home IS NOT affordable for most police, firefighters or teachers. And housing is VERY DEFINITELY cheaper in Fredericksburg, Amelia and other outer areas. Even in Williamsburg because you can buy smaller homes there that cost less.

Flag Comment Posted by jh28 on May 09, 2009 at 3:08 pm

Mikeyt it is not the city’s job, or a government’s job, to find it’s employees affordable housing in the city.  Also, you are assuming these officers don’t live in the city limits because they can’t afford to.

I’d say they live outside the city limits because they choose to.  But, if they choose to, then they need to get their own transportation to and from work.

Flag Comment Posted by Ted M. on May 09, 2009 at 2:13 pm

A take home policy for police cars is not exactly a terrible thing. I think if officers live within 20 miles of the city or as in Henrico, in a locality contiqous with the city then they ought to be able to keep the perk.

I agree, driving as far as Willimsburg, New Kent etc is a bit of a stretch. I use to live in New Kent myself and drove an old cop car to and from the city frequently and I can attest to how expensive it is with gas prices as they are now.

Maybe the solution is two pronged. Let officer’s take cars home in to contiguous localities but take out a small amount in their pay for the cost of gas and maintenance if an officer elects to take a car home daily.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement