Jones looks to tighten Richmond policy on take-home cars for officers
File / Alexa Welch Edlund / Times-Dispatch
Richmond Police Officer Christel Winston stands by one of 40 new Richmond Police take-home cars at a 2007 press conference.
Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones said yesterday that he's committed to tightening a policy that allows police officers to drive their vehicles home even if they live well outside the city limits.
City Council members blasted the policy as excessive after learning this week that take-home vehicles have been authorized for officers who live as far out as Fredericksburg, Jetersville and Bumpass.
"I think the thing that we need to acknowledge is there is a problem," Jones said. "We certainly are concerned about our police cars being in distant localities."
The mayor said he expects to work quickly with Police Chief Bryan T. Norwood to revise the policy so it focuses on keeping police vehicles in the city. Jones said he believes that presence helps to deter crime in the neighborhoods where the officers live.
"The gray area is what's going on outside the city," he said.
Councilwoman Reva M. Trammell, chairwoman of the council's public-safety committee, agrees that changes are needed.
"The policy in place is not fair, especially when officers are not going to get a [pay] step increase" in the next fiscal year, she said.
The police department has 261 marked and unmarked vehicles assigned for take-home use, according to a May 4 memo from Norwood to Trammell. The memo lists the number of vehicles by the officers' home ZIP codes.
Based on its review, Trammell's office has estimated that perhaps two-thirds of the vehicles regularly leave the city. Many are driven to Henrico and Chesterfield counties, but others go to Powhatan County, Providence Forge, Montpelier, Columbia, Amelia Courthouse, Studley, Maidens, Williamsburg, Aylett, Petersburg and Moseley.
Norwood responded to questions about the take-home policy with a brief statement that his department was working with the city administration and council "to meet budget mandates and provide public safety to the city of Richmond."
The police department technically has separate policies for marked and unmarked take-home vehicles, and both were approved in 2007 by then-Chief Rodney Monroe. Take-home assignments are made at the chief's discretion but are intended in part for on-call officers.
In March, Norwood tightened the rules for marked vehicles by prohibiting travel outside the city, instead of outside the region, unless approved by a supervising major. He did not offer clarification.
Councilman Chris A. Hilbert has estimated that allowing police vehicles to leave the city could be costing taxpayers as much as $600,000 per year. Trammell said she thinks the figure is higher.
Hilbert agreed the policy needs tightening but said certain situations may justify take-home vehicles for officers living outside the city. But in those cases, he said, the city should limit how much it contributes.
"People can live wherever they want to live, but you can't rely on the taxpayers of the city of Richmond to subsidize your commute," he said.
Because of budgetary constraints, the Henrico County Division of Police has been phasing out its policy of assigning take-home vehicles to officers who live outside the county, said Lt. Doug Perry, a police spokesman. To qualify, officers have had to live in localities contiguous to Henrico.
In Chesterfield, take-home vehicles are assigned to officers who live in the county, but at least two exceptions have been made for officers living elsewhere, said Ann P. Reid, a spokeswoman for the Chesterfield Police Department. An official with the Hanover County Sheriff's Office did not respond to questions about its policy.
Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
“Why won’t the city provide housing that they (cops) can afford?“ Because the city is not in the real estate business that’s why? We have private companies that sell real estate and there is plenty of affordable housing here in Richmond. Do you think Fredricksburg and Williamsburg are cheaper? Gimme a break. These cars are owned by the people of the city of Richmond and should not leave the Metro area unless on official city business…PERIOD.
The more I think about this, the more this question keeps coming back: If an on-call officer takes his/her vehicle home to Williamsburg, how helpful can he/she be in an emergency? Whether they have the police vehicle or their own, it’s still going to take them an hour to get here.
I don’t have a problem with on-call people taking their car home to Chesterfield, Henrico, anywhere within about 15-20 miles of Richmond. I’m hopeful that most of the true emergency on-call folks probably live in or very near to the city anyways. No cars should be leaving the metro Richmond area. Amelia, Providence Forge, Williamsburg is just ridiculous.
A more pertinent question ought to be why do these officers have to live in Fredericksburg, Williamsburg or Amelia? Why won’t the city provide housing that they can afford? If the city provided affordable housing, officers wouldn’t have to live 50 miles away so they wouldn’t take city vehicles all over central Virginia and run up gas charges beyond belief. If the city wants to cut costs, start letting builders build homes that city employees can afford to buy.
If an officer is subject to “emergency” call back (SWAT, Homicide, Bomb team, etc.) They should be permitted to drive their car outside of Richmond. (with in reason…Fredericksburg is a bit much!)
If I need them in my neighborhood for an emergency, I want those highly trained officers to be on scene ASAP!
Do those officers on call 24/7 get paid extra?
If not, they should have some perks for being on call 24/7; I can’t imagine the inconvenience to family life that causes!
As far as the mayor’s detail, that needs to be re-evaluated.
I believe if an officer is on call 24/7 AND lives within the jurisdiction of his/her employment (i.e. RPD within the city, Henrico within the county, Chesterfield within the county), they should be allowed to drive their police cars to/from home. That is a distinct privilege. Otherwise, the car should be left at headquarters and use their own to get home.
However, if the officer lives in a jurisdiction outside of their territory, they should not be allowed to drive it home. If they elect to continue to drive the car, then they should be financially responsible for the upkeep, maintenance and fuel, as if it were their own vehicle.
To allow an officer to continue to drive a city police car and live in Williamsburg (or wherever) is not right. After all the city of Richmond taxpayers are subsidizing someone driving to/from Williamsburg daily.
I can see where it is worth a look as to how these take-home cars are used however, I bet that when an officer has his or her own car, it is better kept-up with service and maintenance and cleanliness than pool cars. That in itself has got to be a savings for the department. How do I know this? My husband has one.
Just as we own every public piece of property in the city, but we don’t have the ability to dictate what happens with any of that property.
I don’t necessarily agree that it is appropriate for a regular, patrol officer to be allowed to take his car to his/her home outside of the Metro Richmond area, but I STRONGLY feel that the decision should be left up to the chief of police. Useless Jones should stick to other matters.
Lastly, isn’t Reva the LAST person we need making decisions for our city. Oh. That’s right. I almost forgot that she’s an expert on matters involving police vehicles!!!
supman- you asked so… I’m an average taxpaying citizen living in Richmond City. I beg to differ. I, along with the rest of taxpaying RIC citizens, own those cars. They shouldn’t even cross the city line unless they are going home with someone who is on call (detectives, supervisors, k-9).
I agree though about the security detail… what a joke! Has anyone ever attempted to assassinate the mayor of Richmond or does anyone even care enough to try? Give me a break!
Leave the policy alone. The men and woman in uniform working for the City of Richmond deserve to take home a vehicle no matter where they live. I’ll bet if you asked the average taxpayer, they would support no change in policy. Give them a break - no one else will.
90% or more of those vehicles are officers (like K9), detectives and supervisors that are on call. Why doesn’t city council try to figure out how to recover the incredible amount of money that was wasted on the former Mayor’s security-provided by Richmond Police!
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement