Personal use of police cars reduced

» 14 Comments | Post a Comment
RICHMOND, Va. --

The Richmond Police Department is allowing fewer of its cars to be driven home at night, and only a few go as far as King William and Goochland counties and the city of Hopewell.

Though a majority still leave the city limits, the number of take-home vehicles assigned to police employees has dropped from 255 to 220 after Chief Bryan T. Norwood tightened the policy this summer, according to a Richmond Times-Dispatch review of data on vehicle assignments.

Mayor Dwight C. Jones and other officials had complained that the department was allowing some marked and unmarked police cars to be driven as far as Williamsburg, Fredericksburg, Jetersville in Amelia County, and Bumpass in Louisa.

Those long commutes have been reduced but not eliminated under the new policy, which was announced in July.

Victoria Pearson Benjamin, the police department's general counsel, said the department has not estimated the cost savings from the policy revision, but officials previously identified a $98,000 savings based on an initial plan to remove 28 vehicles from the take-home program.

The department previously reported 10 vehicles leaving the Richmond-Petersburg area, with two going to Amelia, one to Fredericksburg, five to King William, one to Louisa, and one to Williamsburg.

Now, the total is one, to King William.

The idea behind police take-home car programs is to deter crime in neighborhoods and to give officers an additional benefit.

"I would prefer for more city of Richmond police officers to reside in the city, and I believe the new police car take-home policy is a first step in that direction," Jones said in a statement.

"Chief Bryan Norwood has been implementing the policy while simultaneously working to maintain the morale of the police department."

The new policy allows exceptions based on operational needs, but it is designed to limit assignments of marked police cars to officers who live in the city and to keep unmarked vehicles within 15 miles of the city limits.

The policy allows vehicles that travel farther from the city to be based on operational needs, such as if officers may be called back to duty after-hours.

Benjamin said the only cars authorized to go beyond the 15-mile limit are the three that go to King William, Hopewell and Goochland.

Overall, 88 vehicles -- or 40 percent -- remain in Richmond, compared with 89 -- or 35 percent -- previously.

The number of cars that leave the city has dropped more dramatically, from 166 to 132. A large majority of those vehicles are driven to Chesterfield and Henrico counties and, to a lesser degree, Hanover County.

The Richmond Police Department released information on take-home assignments this week after a request under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.

The previous policy, approved in 2007 by then-Chief Rodney Monroe, had no geographic boundaries and allowed take-home vehicles to be assigned solely on performance. The new policy is more comparable with those of other area departments.

The Henrico Division of Police has been phasing out its policy of assigning take-home vehicles to officers who live outside the county. The policy has stipulated that they live in contiguous localities.

The Chesterfield Police Department allows sworn officers who live in the county to take home their vehicles, but others also may be granted the privilege after a review by Chief Thierry G. Dupuis, police spokeswoman Ann Reid said.

The Hanover Sheriff's Office allows sworn officers who live in the county to take their vehicles home, although some officers who live within 10 miles of Hanover still have take-home cars that were approved under a previous policy, Capt. Mike Trice said.



Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: rodney monroe,richmond police department,dwight jones,city of richmond,bryan norwood,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by powhatanrep on November 25, 2009 at 12:39 pm

You would think that the two officers who live together in Powhatan could at least car pool.

Flag Comment Posted by yusaywhat? on November 25, 2009 at 12:35 pm

Jack, the program is and was supposed to be for RPD officers who live in the City.  Period.  Everything that has happened since is either horrendous management, lack of concern, something close to misuse of public property, and just bad all the way around.  I am really disgusted that the top people - whose salaries are escalating yet again - and I mean Wilder, Jones, Monroe and Norwood, can be so callous.  So where is this Byron Marshall who is the CAO on this?  It’s on him too.  Do right, and keep doing right are what they ought to be doing.  So much for this elected mayor thing as being good for accountability.

Flag Comment Posted by GuidoMcGinty on November 25, 2009 at 11:29 am

I can hear it now at some future political announcement: “I SAVED you $1 mm because I aggressively wasted less than I could have.“  Excellent.

This is the true essence of the state.

Flag Comment Posted by my2cent on November 25, 2009 at 11:13 am

They have always justified the take home cars, by saying the ones that have them are “on-call”. I know for a fact the majority of them rarely get called in, RPD always has people working around the clock, and it would only add ten minutes to their hour response time to go to headquarters and pick up their police car anyway. City rules pay them overtime for 30 mins driving each way, which compensates them for their gas anyway. So what is the justification for the cars leaving the city??? Waste!!!

Flag Comment Posted by deebat on November 25, 2009 at 10:43 am

I wonder whether the officers use their turn signals and mind the speed limit when they take their cruisers outside the city limits. They sure don’t do so here in the city.

Flag Comment Posted by Jack on November 25, 2009 at 10:13 am

I have no problem with driving the vehicles home “IF THEY LIVE IN THE CITY”. The presence of a police car has some deterrent measure but that is not the case when it’s parked in another county or city. Where they live is their choice but Richmond taxpayers should not have to pay for free transportation in and out of the city.

Yes they put their lives on the line for us but that is not the question. If the cops want this perk then move to the city.

Flag Comment Posted by mjrichmond on November 25, 2009 at 9:58 am

While I agree that these men and women put their lives in danger to protect the public, no one forced them into the job.  They chose their profession - no one drafted them into the RPD. 

I imagine the cost of maintenance for this fleet of vehicles, that is driven home daily, must be enormous.  I agree with most of you about the savings to taxpayers if this was eliminated.  Also, think about the new equipment, officers, etc they could purchase instead of the maintenance costs if this program was eliminated.  For someone who is gung-ho RPD, which is more important?

No one is asking them to drive their personal cars during their shifts.  Let them drive to work and home like the rest of us!

Flag Comment Posted by my2cent on November 25, 2009 at 9:56 am

The cars shouldn’t leave the city period, unless on official business. Police officers don’t pay income taxes on the take-home car perk, like the rest of us do because of an IRS loophole. All those cars that leave the city are unmarked, you think if you are broken down on the side of the road. They are going to stop to help you on their way home???

Flag Comment Posted by yusaywhat? on November 25, 2009 at 9:11 am

This article is actually pretty disturbing. 

As I understand it, the take home car policy was exactly as Ric4me describes it, but then of course the Wilder/Monroe team had to corrupt it.  Under them, it was a car for anyone (and gas and maintenance too, what fun!), and they didn’t care a bit.

So an audit gets done that busts the illegitimacy of the program. That’s good, though it would be better if these highly paid executives would do right and not have to be caught.

Now after some time has gone by, the program hasn’t been brought back to “right”, but just a little bit not as corrupt.  That, according to the RPD’s in-house counsel (because of course RPD has to have its own law firm too - wonder if they’ll need a jet next), constitutes a “savings.“  A SAVINGS? 

And then you get Mayor Jones, and while I don’t think that he is anything like crazy Wilder, Jones apparently doesn’t have a clue. 

This is just the latest clear example of mismanagement and waste, and pretty well describes what’s wrong with Richmond. 

I can hear it now at some future political announcement: “I SAVED you $1 mm because I aggressively wasted less than I could have.“  Excellent.

Flag Comment Posted by ProudAmerican24 on November 25, 2009 at 9:05 am

I think they should be allowed to drive their cruisers home.  They put their lives on the line for our protection.  The deserve the benefit.  Plus, when they get up in the morning and put their uniform on, they are immediately on duty and need their cruiser with them.

To the poster who said they don’t have jurisdiction, they can still apprehend a suspect who committed a crime.  They are required to call the local police authority to take over from there, though.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement