Carytown security doubled for party
EVA RUSSO/TIMES-DISPATCH
Crowds gathered to celebrate the new year last year in Carytown.
Related Info
Published: December 31, 2008
Updated: December 31, 2008
Doubling the number of Richmond police for Carytown's New Year's Eve party and making an emergency lane down the middle of the street have driven up security expenses.
The festival will charge admission for the first time as it faces what organizers say is a more than three-fold increase in security expenses, which will approach the security cost for the three-day Richmond Folk Festival. That even draws nine times as many people.
The costs include:
--a near-doubling of the bill for police protection, to $29,045 from $15,000 last year;
--$17,000 to a private security firm, mainly to manage admission and monitor alcohol sales;
--$10,000 to $12,000 to rent barricades to create an emergency lane down the middle of West Cary Street.
Last year's event had a few incidents -- broken windows, stolen beer and a minor scuffle -- but nothing major, said Raylene Wilkinson, president of the Carytown Merchants Association.
She said she believes those incidents are why police are charging more this year.
"I understand the police point of view . . . we just wish the city would recognize what this event means. It's just that it's a lot of money," said Wilkinson, who also is president of Raylene's Pennyrich, a bra shop on Cary Street.
She said police protection was part of the permit process required by the city, since the event will be on city streets.
Wilkinson said the merchants asked if they could keep the emergency lane to side streets, as is done in most Richmond street festivals, or place the lane down the side, not the middle, of the street, but both requests were denied.
Police Chief Bryan T. Norwood said he is doubling the number of officers because last year's event was understaffed. He said he expects as many as 20,000 people to attend this year's event.
He declined to say how many officers will be on hand, citing security concerns. The contract bills $35 a hour for police officers and says they will be paid for a minimum of four hours even if they don't work that long.
"We felt it would be prudent to increase our staffing . . . in the interest of public safety," Norwood said. He said the decision to double the number of officers was made "after an assessment of last year's event and the number of people that showed up last year."
He declined to discuss any specific incidents from last year, adding: "It was a great event last year. It's going to be an even better event this year."
Norwood said it was the merchants association's decision to hire private security and that he supports that decision.
Hiring private security in addition to police is fairly common at Richmond events, especially where alcohol is involved.
More than half of Venture Richmond's $49,239 security bill for the Folk Festival -- $27,639 -- went for private security, mainly to handle gates and monitor alcohol use.
The group's $25,947 bill for the eight Friday Cheers concerts this year and the $15,343 for the Second Street Festival covered police and private-security services.
In contrast, Venture Richmond's bill for the Easter Parade, where no alcohol is sold, was $4,572, while the Carytown merchants pay $4,000 to $5,000 for security at the booze-less Carytown Watermelon Festival, Wilkinson said.
. . .
Now in its third year, the New Year's Eve celebration has grown quickly from a crowd of about 4,000 to 14,000 last year to an expected gathering of 20,000 or more this year, Wilkinson said.
This year's event, like the first two, is centered around the raising of a big, well-lighted ball. Unlike the first two years, there will be a $2 cover charge this year. Gates open at 7 p.m. The National Weather Service forecasts clear skies, with a low around 20 degrees.
The good news, though, is that if things go well this year, the price from police could go back down next year, Wilkinson said she was told.
Paying for police protection isn't out of the ordinary in Richmond, said Jack Berry, head of Venture Richmond, which promotes a variety of local festivals.
"It doesn't sound like they're being treated any different than any other festival or event," he said.
He said the process was usually pretty simple: "The police determine what's needed, and we pay it."
Contact Zachary Reid at (804) 775-8179 or
. Contact Reed Williams at (804) 649-6332 or
.
Staff writer David Ress contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
It’s good to see that there were no big emergencies. Some organizations have found it useful to have an emergency notification service to be able to alert staff and citizens during an emergency or other critical incident. Management during these situations is important. An emergency notification system is definitely something for any municipality to consider, especially a notification service that can contact poeple on multiple devices (landline, cellphone, email.) Thanks!
Blueline, you bear out my point exactly. The event was billed $35/hour/officer with a 4 hour minimum; if you were paid no extra and given no choice, that is something you or your union should address with your employer. In your position, I would be upset if funding for my salary was collected twice(once through taxation and again through the permit process)and I was paid only once. The budget of the RPD is being inriched on your back.
And the reason for focusing on the increased security is….?
All in all, the event appeared to go off without a hitch. Traffic was smooth and police were plentiful in directing at intersections. The emergency lane going down the center of Cary Street did not seem to get in the way or create any annoyances. The crowd was great and respectful of one another’s good times, the bands were great, portable toilets were plentiful and without lines, and there was more than enough free parking within an easy walk of the festivities. Might just be me, but I don’t think there was anywhere near the expected 20-25,000 people though.
I am trying to remain respectful here, but it’s people like you… ‘sees clearly’ YOU ARE A COMPLETE IDIOT. I’m sorry but there is NO hourly rate, and yes, we work ALL FOUR OF THEM- that would posess me to WANT to be near people like you, instead of my loved ones on new years eve, or any other holiday that I DON’T GET PAID EXTRA FOR- no reason good enough in the world. SSSSHHHHHHHHHH. Go back to work monday thru friday, and call us when you get beat up, like we do sometimes daily protecting you. I would venture to say you STILL make more money than I do. Happy new year =)
Posted by ( jadie ) on December 31, 2008 at 8:49 pm
We went the first year and it was fun there was hardly any police presence and there were no incidents. we went last year and got there late so we turned around and left pretty quickly. this year we were going to go but decided on going to a friend’s house to party instead. who wants to be patted down at the gate, have to stand in huge lines to pay too much money for drinks, and long lines for bathrooms. the first year people around us had snuck in liquor, but were under control. and people were able to have fun with out spending so much money. this year it seems the party is over. why can’t they let people just have fun? if someone is vandalizing or fighting then arrest them but why punish everyone? I am just happy we got to go the first year and have that one time experience to have fun in richmond without a lot of rules.
I haven’t seen the City of Richmond do anything right for many decades now.
Whenever they’re GIVEN (or annex)anything, they botch it up, kill it, milk it for all it’s worth. Examples: Maymont Park, Louis Ginter Botanical Garden, Bryant Park, Azalea Mall - need I go on?
The City government hasn’t been the same since the days of Howard Carwile -who was the ONLY politician who was worth a salt.
I understand and support the need for security large events such as this but I am convinced that city is using the permit process rob this event. I wonder if police officers are being paid the full $35/hour the event is being billed? Is it possible that with each officer being paid for 4 hours no matter how long they work, that this event is being used as a bonus for officers who can log in for 5 mins, leave and still be paid? The most compelling reason that I can see for an emergency lane splitting the street in two is that it will “require” police staffing on two sides rather than one; doubling the number of officers billed to the event. As an event professional, I’ve seen these scams before and I believe the city is using this event to pad the police payroll and slow the migration of city officers to higher-paying localities.
This is an event that I will definitely not be attending again this year. Yes, it was fun last year, but not worth the chaos. Too many drunk people in one place that do not know how to act in public. People showed up at practically 12:00 wanting to push and shove there way to the very front of the crowd, which in turn caused a lot of fights and arguments. Then when fights would break out, the police officers could barely make it to the fight to get it under control. Not too mention that people were fighting the police officers as well, which is why the whole emergency lane has been brought about. Personally, I think it will be a disaster, but the intentions are good. To sum everything up, the upped security will definitely be needed and good luck to those that attend!
I think it is great that the City has something like this in Carytown. The only problem is that all the police are over in Carytown and non partol the nieghborhoods. The last two years over in the Northside people were shooting off guns into the air and not one police was seen in the area. It sounded like we were in a war zone. The police response from police was they people that were shooting the guns off in the air weren’t hurting anyone. I going to have leave my nieghborhood tonight cause I know it going to be samething this year.
Too bad the police are more concerned with making money from Carytown’s New Year party at the expense of the it’s neighborhoods.


Advertisement