Chesterfield plans for renewed development
Lindy Keast Rodman / Times-Dispatch
Matoaca District Supervisor Marleen Durfee at the causeway and road expansion site on Woolridge Rd. near Genito where construction is ahead of schedule.
Published: June 14, 2009
|
IF YOU GO Comprehensive plan: Chesterfield County's 32-member comprehensive-plan steering committee will meet for the first time this week. The committee is made up of three members appointed from each district and representatives from various local groups and industries. When: 6:30 p.m. Tuesday Where: Community Development Building, 9800 Government Center Parkway, in the multipurpose room |
As Chesterfield County launches its first attempt to comprehensively shape countywide growth, the full force of decades of liberal development has yet to be felt.
With development slowed to a crawl in the recession, leaders have some breathing room to catch up in a community that long ago outgrew its roads and public facilities in many areas. But the cash-strapped county is finding it difficult to make progress on billions of dollars worth of improvements, despite favorable costs.
"A slowdown in growth does give us an opportunity to catch up," County Administrator James J.L. Stegmaier said. "On the other hand, unlike previous slowdowns that I've experienced, this one is hitting our revenues unusually hard, which has made it difficult to play catch-up."
There are about 120,000 homes in Chesterfield. As the county develops, the number could soar to 227,000 under current land-use guidelines. The county population of about 314,000 could grow to 370,000 by 2020, the Planning Department has projected.
A 2003 growth analysis report served as a wake-up call for the county, revealing among other things that nearly half the land in the county was already zoned for development.
Marleen K. Durfee, the Matoaca District supervisor elected in 2007, says progress must be made sooner rather than later.
"I'm encouraged that we have this opportunity," she said. "We need to prioritize and strategically work toward serving the population that is being underserved and identify other areas of need."
As an example, Durfee pointed to the under-construction Swift Creek Reservoir causeway, where a half-mile stretch of Woolridge Road is being widened from two to four lanes and a new bridge built over a piece of the reservoir. It is the first of many phases of building significant road infrastructure in the fastest-growing part of the county, a link between Hull Street Road and state Route 288.
The county saved $2 million on the $10 million project by taking bids when the economy was down, Durfee said.
"We're getting the best prices we've seen for work in a long, long time," said county Planning Director Kirkland A. Turner.
But there's a long way to go. Chesterfield's current road needs amount to nearly $1.5 billion, said John McCracken, the county's transportation director.
He said he recently received word that the county would receive about $1.5 million for its secondary road budget from the Virginia Department of Transportation for fiscal 2010.
"That's about the same we had in the 1970s, and the road costs have probably at least doubled, if not quadrupled. There's just no way you're going to keep up under that scenario," McCracken said. "It's really impossible to do any true planning when that's the kind of revenue you're talking about. You really have no construction program -- that's what it boils down to."
Schools, too, are behind. Of 64 public schools in the county, 27 are above student capacity and 27 are more than 40 years old. In western Chesterfield, there also is a growing need for fire and police stations.
As the county struggles to make up ground in the short term, it is launching the first detailed countywide plan for growth, with an emphasis on providing infrastructure with development, rather than behind it.
The process, to be conducted over the next 18 months, will be led by a 32-member steering committee working with the public and planners. The comprehensive plan would replace the current 21 individual area plans.
One of the many goals of the new document will be to establish countywide levels of service for schools, roads, fire departments and libraries. The levels will limit growth based on infrastructure already available.
Another focus, Stegmaier said, will be encouraging economic development to help diversify the tax base and create revenue for infrastructure.
"We don't want the future to look like the past," he said. "If we're willing to exercise a little bit more control over our future, we can, for example, create a tighter connection between residential growth and job growth, which by itself will facilitate advancing infrastructure."
In the meantime, tighter controls on growth have been established by the Board of Supervisors, of which four members took office last year on promises to change the patterns of the past.
New projects have been focused in areas with existing infrastructure, and an effort has been made to prevent leapfrog development. Last year, Durfee led an effort that saw new land-use and watershed plans adopted for the county's most environmentally sensitive area, Upper Swift Creek.
Cash proffers -- money collected by the county from developers to mitigate the impact of development on public facilities -- are now the highest in the region, at $18,080 per home.
But last year also saw the largest development in county history approved. Roseland, in 10 to 20 years, will mean an additional 5,540 homes in northwest Chesterfield. The immediate fate of other giants such as Branner Station (4,988 homes) and Magnolia Green (3,550 homes) remains uncertain due to economic conditions, but there is little doubt the land will be developed in time.
"There will always be debate around growth," Durfee said, noting that stopping it entirely was not the answer. "We need to encourage growth that is prosperous to improve the quality of life for all citizens of the county."
Mike Harton, a resident and member of the comprehensive-plan steering committee, said Chesterfield appears headed in the right direction but needs to brace for development's resurgence.
"I think the county can accomplish a great deal in this time," he said. "It's just going to require a reshuffling of priorities. It's going to require citizens of the county pulling together and recognizing they can't be just concerned with their little corner of the world -- we're one county."
Contact Wesley P. Hester at (804) 649-6976 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Are there bike lanes on the new causeway?
People are always complaining about traffic and the only remedy seems to be add more lanes rather than accommodate different modes of transportation.
What? Chesterfield has a “32-member comprehensive-plan steering committee” to work on their Comprehensive Plan??
Henrico doesn’t have a 32-member comprehensive-plan steering committee.
Jer1234… as a builder I can tell you that you, too, are partly right. We built homes that were too large over the last few years. But we built them partly because the market demanded it and partly because the county would no longer let us build the smaller homes. What we didn’t do was make sure the people who wanted and bought the $300,000 and up new homes could afford them. We trusted the banks and mortgage lenders to do their job and took our business. We shouldn’t have.
There were two zoning classifications for smaller homes in Chesterfield County until mid-1997—R-7 for 7,000 sf lots, and R-9 for 9,000 sf lots. Then the Board of Supervisors discontinued them because they thought the smaller homes were bringing in too many renters. Now the smallest zoning classification a developer can get to build a subdivision on rezoned land is R-12, which means minimum half-acre lots. Trying to build a 1700 sf home on a half-acre lot doesn’t work. The development costs of the land are too high. There are still some R-7 and R-9 lots available, but most are in areas that are undesirable or that the county doesn’t want developed. The home builders association is trying now to get the county to reinstate the R-7 and R-9 designations so that they can build smaller homes. The association says the county is resisting but might do it. If it happens, you’ll see new quality single-family detached homes in the $200,000 to $225,000 range again.
Builders don’t decide what the public wants. In fact, more than 80 percent of all new homes are sold to people who come to the builder before the first shovel of dirt to build that home is turned. The people tell us what they want and we build it. The other 20 percent are called “spec homes,“ where builders build a home on speculation that they can sell the home quickly, based on what their previous customers have said they want. There have been very few spec built in the Richmond area in the last year because new homes aren’t selling. New homes being built today are built solely when a customer comes to the builder, even with the big builders who generally build the most spec homes.
LOWER THE PROFFERS. Investors can’t come to C’field because the cost is too HIGH!!!! WHY can’t ya’ll GET it? Simple business equation: to increase revenues thru increased sales, LOWER the PRICE!!!
I hope before Chesterfield does any more development.They get rid of all those ugly trailers sitting around the schools making them look like trashy trailer parks. This ruins the appearance of the entire county. Chesterfield could use more factory type business that bring jobs and capitol here, not just more houses with people with their hand out.
mikeyt, much of what you say is true but one of the reason no one can affors a house is because the builders have decided that a $300,000.00 home that is in excess of 2500 sq ft is what the people of Chesterfield wants. What happened to all the 1700 to 2000 sq ft homes that wer the norm in the 80’s and early 90’s? Who can afford these goliaths these days? When the builders realize that many people can not afford these houses without the mysery rate loans that caused the banks to go broke then they will start to build more affordable homes. This is why the outlying counties like Amelia and Dinwiddie are no the places to be. The developers/builders are now building oversize houses there and many are empty because they are unaffordable. When will they wake up to what the people really want which is a house theat they can afford on their salary and not have to be in debt for 40 years. i wouldn’t buy a house today if it was the last thing available. They are too expensive and too large for the normal household.
We talk about directing development to infrastructure, but cash proffers are supposed to go toward infrastructure. What the county actually does is make homebuyers pay the proffer (yes, the builder pays the proffer when they get a building permit but they pass that added cost along to the homebuyer, just like a gas station passes along higher gas costs to its customers), then force the developer to provide all the infrastructure as non-cash proffers for the subdivision, even if the improvement is located many miles from that subdivision. Development was grinding to a halt in Chesterfield before the economy collapsed because developers have decided they will no longer be ripped off by the county. The loss of revenue is a significant part of the $50 million budget hole the county had to fill for this fiscal year and will be a signficant piece of the hole to be filled for next year.
Chesterfield County is decades behind in infrastructure not because of residential overdevelopment, but because when the development came the county did nothing to bring in economic development—business—that could help balance the county’s tax base. There’s a rule in the economic development industry—business follows rooftops. That means companies that want to relocate in Chesterfield need to see housing growth so they can have a good source of future employees and a place for their current employees to live.
Chesterfield had this growth but did not go out and do what it needed to bring in companies whose employees could fill those homes. Now they have a grossly out-of-balance tax base, and to try to fix their screw up they’re punishing people who want to live in Chesterfield by tacking $18,080 on to the price of any home in a rezoned area to try to make up for lost revenue. They put the cost of housing out of reach of most people to get about $5 million a year in revenue when they need $1.5 billion to pay for their infrastructure needs.
Cash proffers provide for less than 1 percent of the total infrastructure needs of the county, but the $18,080 proffer has run home costs so high that it’s driven developers and builders out of the county, so the housing needed for economic development isn’t being built. And when the economy bounces back the housing won’t be built unless the proffer is killed because the development community simply won’t pay it upfront anymore and charge it to the homebuyer.
Cash proffers do so much more harm than good for the county it’s scary. As long as the proffer is at a ridiculously high rate, Chesterfield will stay far, far behind in its infrastructure needs, which will give the county no choice but to increase property taxes to cover the loss of revenue.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement