Bowling pin the key to Chesterfield’s Uptown Alley
Published: August 29, 2009
A 29-foot rooftop bowling pin sign could make or break plans for a giant entertainment complex in Chesterfield County.
If built, the 52,000-square-foot Uptown Alley would boast 40 bowling lanes on two floors, two restaurants with outside dining, arcades and private party rooms on a 12-acre site at Commonwealth Centre near Hull Street Road.
The $17 million project would have 100 employees and attract 250,000 people a year, estimated Steve Uphoff, the developer and owner of Chesterfield-based Uppy's Convenience Stores.
The county's Planning Commission recommended approval of a zoning amendment request on a 4-1 vote last week, with Chairman Russell J. Gulley dissenting. The Board of Supervisors will hear the case in September for a final decision.
A bowling pin sign atop the building was the chief item of contention at the Planning Commission level.
Uphoff claims it's necessary to attract business to the entertainment center, which would be three-quarters of a mile from Hull Street Road. But some nearby Brandermill residents aren't sold on the idea.
"The bowling pin is considered to be an iconic image," said Andy Scherzer with Balzer & Associates Inc., which is representing Uphoff Ventures LLC. "It's almost integral to the architecture in order to really have this building come alive."
Scherzer said the pin was welldesigned, to be lit at night by a "soft glow from within the building."
Joyce Rowe, president of the Brandermill Community Association, said that even so, the pin likely would be visible from some homes within the community. "There was no input from our 3,700-plus residents concerning this," she said.
Brandermill resident Andrea Epps was supportive of the project and the pin but took exception to the height from the top of the building.
"I think that the bowling pin is beautiful, personally. I think it looks like a bottle of Dom Perignon," she said, suggesting it could be made smaller or relocated.
Said Uphoff: "We have to make the economics work. In order for the economics to work, we have to be visible to the public for the site to have success."
In dissenting, Gulley said excepting the roof-mounted pin from zoning policy could open the door for many similar requests. "I'm a little bit troubled by the precedent that would be set," he said.
Matoaca Commissioner F. Wayne Bass pointed out that the project would generate new jobs and $153,000 a year in tax revenue for the county.
"That's money in our pockets," he said, noting that Chesterfield sorely needs new businesses. "We don't need any more residential. We need commercial."
Contact Wesley P. Hester at (804) 649-6976 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
ust who do the people of Brandermill think they are? As previously stated there are “tons” of trees in Brandermill.I do not think that a soft glow from a large bowling pin would be seen from anyone’s yard. Brandermill residents should be concerned about their neighborhood and not try to dictate growth or signs.
Sounds like a great idea. The Commonwealth Centre area has plenty of room for growth. Adding a ramp onto 288 from Commonwealth Centre Parkway would help traffic congestion. There is no way that anyone who lives in Brandermill could see that bowling pin.
I live in that area, just where would the sign be that residents in Brandermill could see? They have a sound barrier blocking their view and tons of trees. Heck, they can not even see Hull st or the intersection at the commonwealth.
“business follows rooftops“
That’s why West Creek settled in Goochalnd, right Mike T? Goochland had a tremendous surge in “rooftops” so West Creek decided to locate there, right? And the reason Henrico has so much more commercial development than Chesterfield is because they have more “rooftops,“ right?
Well, not exactly. Actually, Goochland allows very little residential development and Chesterfield has a larger population than Henrico. It sounds to me like your view of planning is a bit too simplistic. Or maybe your view is clouded by your own special interests.
Wayne Bass proves conclusively in this story, assuming he’s quoted accurately, that he has no clue about how growth works and should be impeached from the commission.
“That’s money in our pockets,“ he said, noting that Chesterfield sorely needs new businesses. “We don’t need any more residential. We need commercial.“
Apparently, Bass has never talked to a commercial developer. They have a saying… “business follows rooftops.“ That means commercial development looks for residential growth for future business. To draw commercial development you need residential development. That’s Planning 101.
Bass with his quote, proves he has no clue about planning. Of course, Durfee appointed him and she has no clue about planning, either. So we shouldn’t be surprised.
Don’t worry. The supervisors will screw this up and reject it over the bowling pin. I have faith in their ability to mess up anything having to do with growth.
These people are complaining about being able to see the sign from their yards? Really? Cry me a river!
“Uptown Alley” in the middle of sprawling, strip mall Chesterfield… Wow. Did someone actually get paid to come up with that name? Sounds like Redneck central.
I’d be more concerned with the added road congestion a bowling alley of that size would bring to an already congested area then I would be with a sign appearance but I guess for some superficial appearances are more important.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement