Chesterfield schools could lose 525 jobs

» 55 Comments | Post a Comment

The Chesterfield County school system is proposing to eliminate more than 500 positions, funding for Advanced Placement testing and its elementary International Baccalaureate program to make up for a $52 million budget shortfall.

"To say that this is the most difficult budget process I have overseen as a superintendent would be a dramatic understatement," Superintendent Marcus J. Newsome said yesterday at a news conference.

School and department budgets will be reduced by 20 percent, and the expansion of foreign languages at elementary schools would be delayed. Also, employees would be required to take two days off without pay and would not receive raises.

Newsome announced the massive cuts in a presentation of the proposed $551.5 million 2009-10 budget to the School Board last night. The school system expects to lose $52 million in state and county revenue.

The 525 positions proposed for elimination include administrators, teachers and instructional aides. One hundred and eleven classroom teaching positions are included in that number.

Newsome said about half of the 525 positions would be eliminated by attrition and by not filling open positions. He said he has asked school principals to submit their staffing needs based on student enrollment.

Principals informed their staffs yesterday that the positions of dean on the high school level and administrative assistant on the middle school level -- a total of 30 jobs -- would be eliminated. A high school dean of students is an administrator one level under an assistant principal. The employees will have a chance to apply for other positions, he said.

Also in Newsome's budget proposal:

  • The student-teacher ratio would increase an average of one student per classroom.
  • Buses, vehicle and textbook replacement would be delayed.
  • Funding for employee tuition reimbursement, playground equipment and kinder-
  • garten through second-grade math workbooks would be eliminated.
  • Funding would be reduced for safety-net programs and secondary-level field trips.
  • The school system expects to save $514,700 by eliminating funding for AP testing and the majority of funding for industry certification tests. Specialty centers would lose $118,000 and special education $150,000.

    "Most initiatives that were implemented for the last three years have been eliminated," Newsome said. "I think that some of these programs that are being eliminated may never be restored."

    Meredith Ford, a parent of two children, said as she walked into the meeting that she was worried about the effect in the classroom.

    "They're cutting special-education teachers," she said. "Both of my kids are in special education. That's a biggie for me."



    Contact Juan Antonio Lizama at (804) 649-6513 or .

    Advertisement

     
    View More: schools,marcus j,chesterfield schools,chesterfield county,chesterfield,budget,
    Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
     

    Advertisement

    Reader Reactions

    Flag Comment Posted by hjackson on January 30, 2009 at 1:34 pm

    Public vs Private schools is an issue that should be covered in a separate thread. The issue here is the gross mismanagement by the Chesterfield School Board in allowing Mr. Newsome and the administration get into a position that requires severe impact on classroom teachers and students. Mr. Newsome wants to cut the educational opportunities for students while at all costs protect the bureaucratic empire of the school administrators where the top 150 employees make more than $75,000 per year not counting benefits.

    The Chesterfield school system for years has sucked up more and more tax money only more and more students are housed in trailers to show for it. Yes they have built several new schools like Cosby built like a resort costing untold millions more than needed for the affluent population in the area while starving the older parts of the county.

    The current Chairman of the school board is Marshall Trammell who has made a career out of being on the board. It’s time for term limits as Mr. Trammell and the other board members have in my opinion failed in overseeing the school system. When a board elected by citizens refuses to act in the public interest instead of their own interests and agendas then it’s time for citizens to make corrections.

    Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on January 30, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Hey, Genius (since you like to nitpick), it’s not “in tact” (sic). INTACT. One word.

    Flag Comment Posted by NotHoraceMann on January 30, 2009 at 8:37 am

    “I find my sympathy for people who are wealthy enough to send their kids to private schools while demonizing the public is very limited. Boo-hoo. You spend alot (sic) of money on it and your kid didn’t get into UVA. Cry me a river.” (12step revenge)

    Tommyrot! She wasn’t admitted to UVA because of Virginia’s public school method of teaching to SOLs. Private school students, whose parents are seeking a better education for their children than that offered in the public school system, suffer on the SATs because they have not been taught to the SOLs, the educrats’ notion of an “education.” I’m not crying because she was admitted to Stanford, Northwestern, and Princeton. Credit is due to admissions officers at these institutions for seemingly recognizing the inanity of the “teaching to the SOL approach in Virginia.” And as difficult as it may be for you public school educrats to comprehend, her self esteem is in tact!

    Flag Comment Posted by concerned on January 29, 2009 at 11:31 pm

    12steprevenge, 

    Check out Elijah House Academy:
    http://elijahhouseacademy.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17&Itemid=36

    This school is already making a difference for inner city kids. They will find a way out of generational poverty if given an education. An education is every child’s ticket to equal opportunity. These childrens’ tuition is paid for by benefactors and private donations. 

    Also check out the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program:
    http://www.examiner.com/x-2763-DC-Charter-Schools-Examiner~y2009m1d26-The-DC-Opportunity-Scholarship-Program

    Also, in today’s paper Gerard Robinson with the Black Alliance for Education Options:
    http://www.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/opinion/op_ed/article/SCHOOLCHOICE_20090128-180137/191432/

    We cannot accept the status quo. This is not the answer. There must be systemic change.

    Best to you…

    Flag Comment Posted by ChloeObrien2004 on January 29, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    What you are neglecting to bring up in the private school vs public school debate is that yes private schools are working with less dollars, less staff, less whatever, but they are also working with LESS STUDENTS.  The biggest downfall here with these cuts is going to be the increase in class size.  Differentiation is hard with 20 kids, but 35 is nearly impossible. 

    Just think back to the comparison between listening to a lecture when you were in college to the study group you had with a TA.  No matter how you want to argue about it, the smaller the teacher to student ratio, the more attention each student will receive and the better the classroom will be. 

    Sure private schools do better, but private schools can also keep enrollment low and perhaps more importantly they can eliminate problem students.  We have to take ALL kinds in public schools and find a way to help them learn, so the mean result is always going to be lower than that of private institutions, who can kick a kid out after he punches a teacher in the face, when in a public school, the kid would get 10 days and be right back in the classroom.  I know it sounds dramatic, but these are the realities public schools face.

    Flag Comment Posted by Interested Read on January 29, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    I’m glad I live in Henrico county and don’t have to deal with this issue.  As for my personal experience, I routinely had over 30 kids in my class, teachers gave individual attention, if necessary, and we still ALL came out OK.  In junior high (or now middle school) and high school, we had to pay for literature books.  All other supplies, we furnished, too.  Textbooks were issued at the beginning of each semester.  We had no laptops, no calculators (imagine, we used the slide rule in chemistry!! kids today probably don’t know what a slide rule is!), had to pay for gym clothes and shoes.  We made do with much less than kids do today.  There were no such things as counselors, except for the guidance dept. and then there was one for each class (3), aides, assistants, etc.  In fact, we had an overflow in our school that instead of homeroom at the beginning of the day, we had homeroom/lunch during period 4 or 5, so everyone could be accommodated within a reasonable time frame and we still put in 7 periods in a school day.  There was no such thing as “instructional day” or “inservice day” nor did we have all of the days off that kids have today.  We had school on Columbus Day, King/Jackson Day, President’s Day, only got Good Friday off, NO spring break, and school was held on Memorial Day and we still had to attend school through June 12 because we missed school days due to snow.  The point I’m making here is that we had more school days and fewer holidays than kids do today.  Yes, we did have gobs of homework AND classwork and yes college entrance was important, too.  Yes, teachers were still stressed out, so that is not new.

    Reading the posts here seems to indicate the personnel per student has mushroomed, and generally has not benefitted the student.  More is not better.  But then again, the worst offenses were chewing gum in class, skipping class (not school), walking in the hall without a hall pass, talking in class, underclassmen parking in senior parking spaces.  My, how times have changed.  But is it for the better??

    Granted, Henrico county may have educational issues too, but if Chesterfield schools are so great, why does every school have trailers?  To see kids educated in these facilities is disgusting.

    Real estate agents give newcomers snow jobs about how great Chesterfield is—schools, facilities, quality of life, more house for the dollar, etc….

    Everyone is bemoaning the fact that housing construction, for all practical purposes, has come to a halt.  Maybe it’s time to improve the quality of life and not build wall-to-wall highways, houses, schools, malls ad infinitum, and traffic snarls.  Maybe then Chesterfield can catch up with its school population.  Quit building so many houses.

    So, with these job cuts, education may actually improve!

    Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on January 29, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    Your very welcome admin.  I am an adult and a social worker, thank you so much for asking.  It was really polite of you.  I’m also curious to know if you are an actual admin?  If you aren’t I really hope you can be one day.

    I’m so sorry that I have an opinion and I feel like expressing it and engaging people who I don’t agree with.  The only way issues in this world get solved is to get into it with one another sometimes. If we had happy go lucky, aww shucks debates, how would you decide which side to choose?  Well, she was a much nicer person, I think I’ll pick her even though she didn’t say anything that made sense.

    I’ll try not to be such a meanie pants.  As for extending respect… more than enough people have posted plenty of rude responses directed at me, so I don’t see a lot of respect coming my way.  I’m sorry that you see me disagreeing disrespectful, but we can’t all smile, look pretty, and be seen and not heard all the time.

    Flag Comment Posted by admin on January 29, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    “I am not a teacher. Social worker actually (not with social services just in case someone wanted to know).“

    If that were really true then you’d know what discretion & patience are. People here so far ‘ve been very patient with your ‘going off the beam’ (maybe you can’t help it?). But its high time you started extending to others the same degree of tolerance and respect granted to you. This is meant to be an adult forum believe it or not. Maybe one day you can be a social worker. Thanks. js

    Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on January 29, 2009 at 7:54 pm

    ... and just where do you get that I have an uncaring attitude towards student achievement? I give every bit of myself every day at school. I care very much about the achievement of my students. However, with the population I serve, that’s not always something you can find in the Standards of Learning Curriculum, so please forgive my lack of regard for “rigorous standards in education” that so many applauded. I find my sympathy for people who are wealthy enough to send their kids to private schools while demonizing the public is very limited. Boo-hoo. You spend alot of money on it and your kid didn’t get into UVA. Cry me a river.

    Having worked in the city schools for a number of years (including what had to be the most dismal school in existence, Whitcomb Court Elementary… I’m glad it was shut down, if only to get those kids out of that neighborhood for awhile), I know what the worst of the worst of public school can be. Would any parent who had the means send their child to that school? Certainly not! But what do you think the solution is? Vouchers? Those kids will be stuck in the same old project’s school because they can’t afford to make up the difference in cost between the share the government will provide and the cost of a private school. Those who had that kind of money moved out of the neighborhood as soon as they possibly could. What you’d be left with is poor kids in an even poorer school. I see that already benefitting people of means and kicking those who are already down (yeah, yeah… my bleeding liberal heart, et cetera).

    What else? Are we going to shut down those schools and bus them to the suburbs? Oh, I bet you wouldn’t like that one either. It’s easy to take a kid out of the ghetto, it’s a little harder to take the ghetto out of the kid when they go back home to the same old street corner. Perish the thought of all of the suburban kids rubbing elbows with the kids from the undesirable neighborhoods. Parents’ heads would explode.

    In all seriousness, I’d like to hear how you’d like to see “school choice” pan out.

    Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on January 29, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    Also, I’m just throwing this out there, because I’m curious what other people think. 

    If parents had the choice to send their child to any school in the county in which they live, what would happen if more parents than capacity allowed wanted to send their child to James River, Deep Run, Hanover High (as examples)?  If the school had 1,600 capacity and 1,590 were taken by the kids who do live in the zone.  25 parents apply to send their kids to said school.  How do you decide which 10 out of that 25 get the spaces? 

    Random lottery?  I can’t think of another way that wouldn’t be discriminating and create a new set of social problems (such as all the “bad” kids ending up at one school).

    Also, then what happens to the 15 kids (above) who don’t the spots at ___ High School? Do they keep shopping around until they get a different school or do they just have to go back to the zone where they live?

    I think it’s really interesting point to debate and both sides of a good argument (sometimes).  To me it just seems like it’s one of those things that will either create defacto segregation or so many crazy policies and regulations for large school systems that it would become cumbersome and we’d just end up back where we are now.

    Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

    • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
    • Respect others.
    • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
    • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
    Click here to post a comment.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Online Features
    Blogs
    DataCenter
    Videos
    Weekend
     

    Advertisement