Chesterfield schools could lose 525 jobs

» 55 Comments | Post a Comment

The Chesterfield County school system is proposing to eliminate more than 500 positions, funding for Advanced Placement testing and its elementary International Baccalaureate program to make up for a $52 million budget shortfall.

"To say that this is the most difficult budget process I have overseen as a superintendent would be a dramatic understatement," Superintendent Marcus J. Newsome said yesterday at a news conference.

School and department budgets will be reduced by 20 percent, and the expansion of foreign languages at elementary schools would be delayed. Also, employees would be required to take two days off without pay and would not receive raises.

Newsome announced the massive cuts in a presentation of the proposed $551.5 million 2009-10 budget to the School Board last night. The school system expects to lose $52 million in state and county revenue.

The 525 positions proposed for elimination include administrators, teachers and instructional aides. One hundred and eleven classroom teaching positions are included in that number.

Newsome said about half of the 525 positions would be eliminated by attrition and by not filling open positions. He said he has asked school principals to submit their staffing needs based on student enrollment.

Principals informed their staffs yesterday that the positions of dean on the high school level and administrative assistant on the middle school level -- a total of 30 jobs -- would be eliminated. A high school dean of students is an administrator one level under an assistant principal. The employees will have a chance to apply for other positions, he said.

Also in Newsome's budget proposal:

  • The student-teacher ratio would increase an average of one student per classroom.
  • Buses, vehicle and textbook replacement would be delayed.
  • Funding for employee tuition reimbursement, playground equipment and kinder-
  • garten through second-grade math workbooks would be eliminated.
  • Funding would be reduced for safety-net programs and secondary-level field trips.
  • The school system expects to save $514,700 by eliminating funding for AP testing and the majority of funding for industry certification tests. Specialty centers would lose $118,000 and special education $150,000.

    "Most initiatives that were implemented for the last three years have been eliminated," Newsome said. "I think that some of these programs that are being eliminated may never be restored."

    Meredith Ford, a parent of two children, said as she walked into the meeting that she was worried about the effect in the classroom.

    "They're cutting special-education teachers," she said. "Both of my kids are in special education. That's a biggie for me."



    Contact Juan Antonio Lizama at (804) 649-6513 or .

    Advertisement

     
    View More: schools,marcus j,chesterfield schools,chesterfield county,chesterfield,budget,
    Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
     

    Advertisement

    Reader Reactions

    Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on January 29, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    I am not a teacher. Social worker actually (not with social services just in case someone wanted to know).

    I was specifically talking to NotHorceMann in my comment… he made it clear he had the money to spend to send his child to private “elite” prep school and he certainly had the choice to use that money to buy/rent a place in a school zone that was more desirable to him.  It’s his deserving attitude that got on my nerves.

    I’m well aware of the perils of people who are stuck living in a not so hot spot.  Those are the families and students I work with every single day.  I think we all need to strive to improve said communities and put extra effort into those schools.  If the parents and neighbors aren’t willing to get involved no real change will happen.  I really just gets to me when people who do have the means to change the circumstances in their lives would rather complain about it then do something.  NotHoraceMann is just a complainer.

    Flag Comment Posted by concerned on January 29, 2009 at 7:24 pm

    MeToo and 12StepRevenge, I am not sure if you are public school teachers, but you are clobbering your own support of public schools by showing your obviously uncaring attitude toward student achievement and bullying manner toward NotHoraceMann.  :)

    Really “choice” is not a difficult concept to understand. We have lots of choices available to us in America. Many, many folks who are “pro-choice” (as in pro-abortion rights) are astonishingly opposed to parents choosing which school their child attends. I, and many others, find this particularly hypocritic.

    Government subsidies already give citizens’ choice in other areas. For instance, Medicare subsidizes health care for seniors. Seniors choose their health care providers, their physicians, specialists, and hospitals. Some even choose Bon Secours, a Catholic-run hospital. Also, Medicaid recipients can choose their health care providers but are limited to those who take Medicaid. Still, imagine the quality of health care if providers were government employees. Scary thought.

    Food stamp recipients can use them at the grocery store of their choice.

    I really don’t understand the confusion concerning school choice.

    BTW, there is no school choice for parents whose children go to failing schools, who cannot afford to move, and who cannot afford tuition at a private school. These parents have NO choice. And, YES, there are compulsory school laws FORCING children to attend failing schools that are no safer than prisons!  Parents can be arrested for truancy.  This is the travesty school choice proponents want to fix.

    I believe any fair-minded person should see the need for giving parents a voice, a say in the education of their children. Even poor, single parents DO care about their children’s education. Because they pay no taxes, the “system” bullies them into thinking they have no voice and no say.

    See if you can find the problem with reading “instruction” in public schools:
    http://www.nifl.gov/partnershipforreading/publications/reading_first1phonics.html

    Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on January 29, 2009 at 6:50 pm

    NotHoraceMann- if you chose to send your child to a private school, why are you complaining about not having a choice in public schools?  Sounds like you CHOSE to live in a neighborhood with a public school you didn’t like, so you CHOSE to send your kid to a private school.

    Cry us a river on how she didn’t get into UVA.  Oh Boohoo.  Perhaps they picked up on your obnoxious sense of entitlement and said no thank you.  We’re all so sorry that you and your “elite” family have to be around us mere average and “normal” people.  How do you cope?

    Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on January 29, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    Oh, the humanity! A typographical error! It must be indicative of my inferior intelligence. You win, Not Horace MaNN.

    P.S.I’m sorry your daughter couldn’t get into UVA… I did! It must’ve been due to my Inferior Public Education or maybe the “system working against her” (or maybe you’re just rationalizing).

    Flag Comment Posted by NotHoraceMann on January 29, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Hmmmm, a public educator who cannot spell Horace Mann’s surname correctly? (Two n’s, not one! That’s public education for you!) I did make the choice and sent my child to private schools grades K-12. Thankfully I had the financial resources to do that, but most are not so fortunate.

    My child worked very hard and intended to enroll in an elite private university after graduation from prep school, however the “system” worked against her. As Ron Melancon stated, the public schools in VA were teaching to SOLs, a strategy not employed at my child’s college prep school. Although her GPA and extracurricular activities were exemplary, she was not even admitted to UVA because of her comparatively low SAT scores!! During the time immediately following her rejection, I had an opportunity to speak w/ a high-ranking official at UVA who told me I should have sent my child to the best private schools K-11 and then pulled her out and enrolled her in George Wythe HS in Richmond for her senior year! The official stated that UVA is continuously seeking kids from public schools like GWHS, but they fall short of admission requirements! Now, you and the rest of the public school educrats can boast all you wish about your product, but in reality, it’s sorely defective when that is the educational paradigm. (Where did that creationism remark come from? Are all educrats so hidebound, or are you an anomaly?)

    Flag Comment Posted by concerned on January 29, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    First of all, I want to make a couple of apologies. I want to apologize for my criticism of teachers in Chesterfield County in an earlier post. I know there are good teachers, believe me, my children have had good teachers!  Dedicated, caring teachers who work hard. But I believe there are too few of these teachers. Else why are outcomes still so poor for minorities, the very groups NCLB was written to help. They are still left behind! I don’t hear voices of teachers shouting that researched-based instruction (must be PEER-REVIEWED under NCLB) must be taught to children in K-2 (i.e. phonics!! not whole language which is a joke!) Where are the teacher-advocates?  Their voices are only heard when they fear a salary cut or a job cut! Many teachers are good teachers, but they are buried under crippling policies and procedures dictated to them by bureaucrats and the school board. Their true talents are supressed, to say the least. Put them in a private school, and they would SHINE! I have many friends who are teachers, so I know what they have to put up with, and they are the ones who tell me what the problems are - lack of vision and politics rule the day in CCPS. Why do 25% of teachers put their own kids in private schools?  This is above the general average. Because they know what public schools are like.

    My second apology is mistakenly citing that 42% of 4th graders in Virginia failed to show proficiency in reading on the NAEP in 2007. This figure should have been 62%!  Sorry for the mistake!

    CCPS has become a bureaucratic Educational Industrial Complex (pronounced ICK) which just exists to perpetuate itself and provide lots of jobs to people. Most decisions are made, not in the best interest of educating students, but in the interest of getting more funding in order to keep and provide more jobs.

    Our private school runs on a shoestring budget, parents are happy, students are happy, teachers are paid 20% less (that’s right 20% less) than public school teachers, tuition is $6,000 per year, and 90+% of all students score higher than grade level on the Standford 10, given each year in the spring. And there is not one aide. Only one secretary. Quality textbooks. All 4th graders can read, even those with disabilities. (There is one NILD teacher for the entire school.) And students are not subjected to bullying, violent environments, profanity. (What’s up with the 18,000 acts of violence in CCPS last year?) The Otis-Lennon ability test is also given along with the Stanford 10 which shows basically an IQ score for the students. Again, 90% of all students have an AVERAGE ability score, but yet over 90% score ABOVE grade level!!!!!!  Fewer dollars, fewer resources, fewer teachers!  Wake up, taxpayers!


    If CCPS really thinks it is striving for excellence (before budget cuts), then prove it to the taxpayers of Chesterfield by giving all 4th graders the Stanford 10 in the spring and compare to the scores of private schools and homeschoolers. If CCPS scores are comparable, then we taxpayers will plead your case. In the meantime, many of us will plead for school choice in order to give taxpayers a huge tax cut!

    I fear the “dumbing down” of Americans is really the creation of the proletariat that has been in the process for over 100 years!

    Flag Comment Posted by MeToo on January 29, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    NotHoriceMann- you do have a choice… move!  Live in the district where you want to send your child.  Can’t afford the area you want? Then get involved in your child school and make it better!  I’ve seen plenty of schools in less desirable areas attract great teachers and create a great environment because they have a strong parental and community visibility within the school.

    Flag Comment Posted by 12steprevenge on January 29, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    NHM: You DO have a choice. There’s nothing mandating your children attend public school. No, wait… you want the government to SUBSIDIZE YOUR CHOICE. Oh, you’re such a fine American (while I am clearly not, right?). You want the public to create a school that embodies what YOU think should be taught in PUBLIC school. How many schools will we have to create to satisfy every complaintant? It’s simply not feasible. Drop the PUBLIC part from your argument and it might hold water. Here’s something: read up on Social Contract Theory. It may provide you with some insight.

    Honestly, if you feel that the public education system as it stands is failing your child, you should exercise your options by sending your child to a private school where you can have them taught creationism or whatever the heck else you want them to learn. Better yet, take on the responsibility your self and homeschool.

    You want

    Flag Comment Posted by NotHoraceMann on January 29, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    12steprevenge, I do not know if our nation was “better” before public ed or not - I wasn’t around to savor that period in history. What I do know is that a new paradigm is needed. And who are you to define what “shared knowledge” our youth “need?“ That sort of thinking is typical of your education establishment and the NEA - you know what’s best for me and my family, not I, a freedom-loving American. Perhaps you should consider teaching in a socialist state where that sort of thinking is cultivated.  And answer my question: Why do I have a choice in every aspect of my child’s life except where he goes to public school?

    Flag Comment Posted by Ron Melancon on January 29, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    today teachers teach to test… they teach to pass the SOL’s.  If they are good teachers then why do we have Sylvern Learning centers… Hunnington Learning Centers and so on… These learning centers are being put everywhere it seems that we might have more of these learning centers than pay day loan locations.  Seriously… I believe we are teaching children to pass an sol.  What is needed is politicians to get out of the way of our teachers and administrators and let them teach!!!!!  We need innovation but to often an excellent teacher cannot express fully what they want to do because they know they will get passed over.  We need to focus on getting our children to learn how to live… how to balance a budjet… how to live within their means… teach them how to buy a home… how to read a mortgage document… the problem is the MORTGAGE document is not laid out in a A-B-C-or D- answer.  I bet if all of these people who bought these sub prime loans were given a Mortgage Document formatted like a SOL test then people would understand.  So what we need to do ... is get all legal documents formatted like an SOL test and our children would understand.

    Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

    • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
    • Respect others.
    • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
    • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
    Click here to post a comment.

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Online Features
    Blogs
    DataCenter
    Videos
    Weekend
     

    Advertisement