National hospitality groups oppose Fort Lee hotel

» 1 Comment | Post a Comment

The Tri-Cities area's hospitality industry is receiving significant support in their campaign against an Army plan to build a 1,000-room hotel at Fort Lee.

On Monday, the National Restaurant Association and the American Hotel and Lodging Association sent a joint letter to key members of the House Armed Services Committee and its Military Personnel Subcommittee asking them to reject the proposed $114 million project.

"A hotel of this magnitude will usurp business from local lodging and restaurant businesses which have spent years investing in the local community and reinvesting in their businesses," said the letter co-signed by Marlene Colucci, AH&LA's executive vice president for public policy, and Beth Johnson, the restaurant association's executive vice president for public affairs.

Linas Kojelis, coordinator of the Greater Tri-Cities Hospitality Coalition, which represents about 160 local businesses in the area and has been a critic of the Fort Lee plan, welcomed the support from the national organizations.

The letter is addressed to Reps. Susan A. Davis, D-Calif., and Joe Wilson, R-S.C., chairwoman and ranking member, respectively, of the Military Personnel Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee, which is set to approve the project.

The American Hotel and Lodging Association, which has been around for nearly a century, represents individual hotel property members, hotel companies, student and faculty members, and industry suppliers. The National Restaurant Association, founded in 1919, represents more than 380,000 member restaurant establishments in the country and works as advocates for the industry.

The Fort Lee plan has been a divisive issue between the base and the community since the summer. Area hotel leaders say the lodging facility, which if built would be the largest in the state, would take the business they hoped to get from the installation.

The construction of the 15-story, 1,000-room hotel is necessary for the base to meet growing demand for temporary housing on post, in part because of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Commission process, Fort Lee officials say.

William Bradner, a deputy public-affairs officer for the Army Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Command, which would manage the hotel, said the Army is committed to proceeding with the project. The command, Bradner said, is awaiting a Department of Defense staff review to add the project to the fiscal 2010 non-appropriated funds major construction program. No taxpayer money would be used to build the hotel.

Fort Lee spokesman Matthew Montgomery said the hotel would bring economic benefits to the region and that soldiers still would use area hotels and restaurants. The installation, he said, continues to encourage its soldiers to get involved in the local communities and take advantage of the restaurants, shopping centers and events outside Fort Lee.

The letter points out concerns about small, privately owned hotels not being able to compete with the large government-owned and government-built business.

"A new 1,000-room complex represents a 25 percent increase in accommodations in the immediate area of the base," the letter states. "This hotel will immediately become, by far, the largest property in this region and as such will drive down demand in the entire lodging market for years to come and immediately capture much of the market share."



Contact Luz Lazo at (804) 649-6058 or .

Advertisement

 
View More: tri cities,fort lee hotel,fort lee,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Dinwiddie Boy on November 04, 2009 at 11:54 am

This argument is ridiculous.  This project has been on the books for years, and it will not be an appropriated funded project - i.e., no tax payer dollars.  Having the troops on the base, inside the secure perimeter is a security plus.  It takes as many as 1000 vehicles a day out of the mix trying to get onto the base each morning.  The base will provide buses/shuttles to classes, service members can ride bikes, or, if at LogU, take a pleasant 10 minute walk to class.  The troops will use their POVs, rentals, or taxis to go off base to eat most nights - there’s your economic impact.  Breakfast at the hotel is a convienence for the troop.  Lunch will be on station in a cafeteria, food court, or at the EDF.  And, as a taxpayer, I’d bet the Inn at Fort Lee nightly rate will be more reasonable (i.e., not max out the JTR per diem rate as the locals will always do everytime it is raised).  Oh, yeah, don’t forget the increase in NAF employee jobs - always a good jumping off point for folks wanting to get into appropriated fund civil service positions. As a 25 year employee of Fort Lee, with the troop base doubling, it will be nice to remove those 1000 vehicles from the mix.  And, MWR puts some of the money back into recreational activities for the base, which also drives the local market (jobs, construction, etc). There are several recreational type projects on the books that may be economical feasible now.  And since PG County, being in the Richmond Metro statistical area, is constantly in and out of ozone non-attainment, reducing the number of trips generated to and from the post meets Clean Air Act goals for air quality.  So, security, environmental, and welfare and recreation considerations make this a no brainer.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement