GRTC wants to merge routes that serve the West End
GRTC Transit System may scale back but not eliminate bus service to the West End, including the University of Richmond.
Officials are revamping their months-old plan to scrap inefficient routes by proposing to combine, rather than cut, the No. 16 Westhampton and No. 13 Main Street/Church Hill routes.
The new, merged route would extend from downtown as far west as Carytown, said John M. Lewis Jr., GRTC chief executive officer.
To offset the loss of service to UR that's now available on the Westhampton route, GRTC is proposing a new express route that would stretch between downtown and the university campus with potentially two stops along the way. That route would cater to weekday commuters and allow transfers onto the merged Westhampton/Main Street route.
If approved by the City Council, the express route could start as early as July, but it's also dependent on UR providing a park-and-ride lot, Lewis said. He would not release a map of the proposed route because it hasn't been presented to the council.
"We will still have considerable savings and still be able to provide service along that [Cary Street] corridor," Lewis said of the changes.
UR officials are weighing the impacts of using the bus-turnaround area off Campus and Boatwright drives as a commuter parking lot with at least 20 spaces.
"We're very supportive of working with GRTC to keep a bus stop close to the university," said Carl Sorensen, associate vice president for human resources. "We still haven't resolved whether we can give up parking spaces."
GRTC would receive $11 million from the city to operate in fiscal 2009-10 -- the same amount as this year -- under the budget proposed last week by Mayor Dwight C. Jones.
That means the City Council will need to approve GRTC's route-cutting plan or face the likely need for fares to be increased to at least $1.50 from $1.25 for the local, nonexpress routes, Lewis said.
"If we're able to cut back on our underperforming routes, I think we'll be OK," he said.
By continuing the routes, GRTC faces a deficit of $4 million in fiscal 2009-10. Lewis believes the deficit can be completely or largely erased by making the route changes as proposed and by using state and federal money.
Council President Kathy C. Graziano said she expects a vote once the details of the West End changes are resolved. She also isn't ruling out the need for a fare increase.
"We've got to balance the needs of the buses and the use, and the money the city is paying into the system," she said.
City Councilman Bruce W. Tyler, who represents the West End, said he supports the idea of consolidating routes but said GRTC also needs to look at ways to operate more efficiently, by using smaller vehicles and providing more service on demand.
"It's time to stop running these oversized buses around the city of Richmond with one or two passengers on them," he said.
Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or
.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I don’t understand Mr Lewis’ obsession with eliminating the Westhampton bus route. In GRTC’s own report it outlines how the #16 is barely under performing based on their own standards, and the data used is several years old. There are other routes that perform worse that are not targeted. There has been a lack of transparency on the part of Mr Lewis regarding the impact of raising fares. He says that raising fares will cause a drop in ridership and gives his own numbers but offers no data to back it up. His behavior regarding U of R borders on extortion. GRTC and U of R entered into a partnership last year and within a few months Mr. Lewis proposed the elimination of the #16. GRTC made changes to some routes and I thought it was over, but here we are again hearing talk of the end of the only bus route that serves the fan and U of R. People rely on this route to get to work and school. GRTC needs to raise it fares. It has been 15 years since they last had a fare hike. Mr Lewis is a one trick pony when it comes to #16, eliminate it. His inability, or more likely, unwillingness to use smaller buses and/or cut back on the route during non-commuter hours raises the question of a bias against the people in the fan and at U of R. There is a quote attributed to Mr. Lewis, “If the route is so important to them, then let them pay for it.“ If that does not imply bias, I don’t know what does. Mr. Lewis’ Southern Maryland sensibilities do not translate well to Richmond’s when it comes to public transit. I question his leadership.
GRTC needs to take it a step further and evaluate ALL the buses that service the West End, particularly the express routes. I ride the 27 Glenside Express daily and have been on an evening bus going to the West End with onl 3 or 4 people on it and there will be the same bus either directly in front of or behind the bus I’m on also going to Glenside with only a few passengers. Why run 2 buses to the same stop when one could accommodate as well. There needs to be some type of communication so that if the buses get “double stacked” like that one bus will not make the run. Actually, I don’t see why all the West End express buses, at least in the evening, don’t become tri-stop buses and service Gaskins, Parham and Glenside on each run. Plenty of times I’m at the bus stop waiting on the Glenside Express and at least 2 each of the Gaskins and Parham buses will go by before I see one Glenside.
If the GRTC will extend the end of the 16 bus route (or its express replacement) a mile down Three Chopt to the Village Shopping Center, I bet the UR students going back and forth between campus and the shopping center will multiply the ridership on the route. Plus the UR turnaround can then be converted to parking.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement