Proposed bus transfer station in Shockoe Bottom meets opposition

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

The Richmond Slave Trail Commission has lined up against a proposed bus transfer center for Main Street Station in Shockoe Bottom.

A majority of commission members agreed last week to oppose the $70 million project on the grounds that the related traffic would undermine efforts to commemorate the area's role in the slave trade, said chairwoman Delores L. McQuinn, a state delegate from Richmond.

"They just felt it would be too congested, too much going on with what we're trying to do," she said.

John M. Lewis Jr., GRTC Transit System chief executive officer, said he was surprised by the opposition and described the transfer center as part of a broader plan to make mass transit more efficient and more regional, and to improve a largely fallow area of Shockoe Bottom.

In its draft environmental-assessment report, GRTC says its preliminary design work shows the transfer center would not negatively impact historic resources, including the nearby site of Lumpkin's Slave Jail.

"We don't go through it. We don't go over it. We don't go anywhere close to it," Lewis said.

The Slave Trail Commission, established by the City Council, is working to erect signs and markers to highlight the path that slaves took as they were loaded off ships at Ancarrow's Landing and walked to Shockoe Bottom, where they were held, sold and traded.

McQuinn also expressed interested in establishing a museum on the city-owned train shed's second level, which GRTC wants to use.

The Shockoe Bottom Neighborhood Association and Historic Shockoe Partnership also are opposing the transfer center as needlessly expensive and incompatible with the historic neighborhood and its tight street grid.

Lewis said GRTC has worked with city officials for more than a year on the Main Street Station project and that about a dozen more-centralized sites across downtown had been considered.

Mayor Dwight C. Jones supports the project in concept but is now focusing on details, including its impacts on GRTC's city-supported operational costs, press secretary Tammy Hawley said.

GRTC is positioning the transfer center project to tap federal stimulus funds. As part of the project, ramps would be built on the north side of the train shed to allow buses to reach the second-level platforms.

While McQuinn cited potentially 1,600 bus trips per day, Lewis said the transfer center would likely serve only about 800 per day, giving passengers a covered place to get off one route and onto another. Most of the 11,000 weekday transfers currently occur between Broad and Main streets, and Second and Ninth streets, Lewis said.

The transfer center, east of downtown, is envisioned as working with other transfer points planned along Broad Street west of Belvidere Street.

The City Council hasn't taken a position on the transfer center but will need to see more details, President Kathy C. Graziano said.

"We definitely need a transfer center," she said. "The question is where should it be? I really don't have a sense of [whether Main Street Station is appropriate] because I don't know what [Lewis'] other options are."



Contact Will Jones at (804) 649-6911 or .

Advertisement

 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Simmertime on April 16, 2009 at 11:51 am

All of this controversy is a waste of time. First of all, only a few people care about a ballpark being built to watch a AA baseball team. Second, the GRTC transfer station may be in the wrong location to service, primarily the poor, to get to and from jobs. Third, only blacks are interested in the Slave Trail. It is not going to generate tourist dollars, even with Lumpkins and a Museum.

So as usual in the City we have questionable suggestions that will be little used or earn no dollars. Why not accept that City of Richmond business moved to Charlotte 20 years ago and that retail & entertainment has moved to Short Pump?

Flag Comment Posted by dklee on April 16, 2009 at 10:56 am

i agree that it is good to remember the past, but without moving on, we will always be stuck in the past.  who cares about preserving the historic aspects of richmond… a little reminder is good enough.

Flag Comment Posted by squier13 on April 16, 2009 at 9:52 am

The transfer station and the Slave Trail can both work in this area, let’s move forward with both projects.

Flag Comment Posted by james on April 16, 2009 at 9:30 am

These people just don’t want a baseball park in Shockoe and they understand a transfer station means a ballpark. McQuinn is talking like there’s no traffic there now! If the traffic that goes through there now hasn’t done damage, a few buses won’t do anything to the historical significance, either. There’s no good reason NOT to put the transfer station there.

Flag Comment Posted by Scott Burger on April 16, 2009 at 9:06 am

As much as I sympathise with the attempts to preserve history, I have to agree with many of the previous comments. We need high speed rail to come through downtown. We need the transfer station. Don’t let Richmond get left behind.

Flag Comment Posted by AnonVA on April 16, 2009 at 8:50 am

It never ceases to amaze me that Richmond would rather obsess about the past then work to improve the lives of citizens in the here and now.

Flag Comment Posted by AG on April 16, 2009 at 8:05 am

Are they serious??  Bringing more visitors can only help their cause!  What is their vision of Shockoe Bottom, a run-down slave theme park?  This begs the question, what is our communal vision of Shockoe Bottom?

I would like to see new development keeping with that old Richmond architecture.  I think this transfer station should be the main hub for future high-speed rail, light rail, buses, and taxis.

Flag Comment Posted by ramfan79 on April 16, 2009 at 7:30 am

The outcries of opposition seem to only really come when ideas (practical and sensible ones, at that) are brought to the table.  And yet, the area just sits there as a blighted and nearly useless plot of land.  If you want to commemorate the Slave Trail, Lumpkin’s, etc., then do it!  Just do something.  This area has been an eyesore for many many years and yet nothing has been done in regards to these commemorations.  Seems to me that all current proposed elements to this area could work, and dare I say thrive, but meanwhile the powers that be in Richmond manage to just keep spinning their wheels in the mud.

Flag Comment Posted by ddub28 on April 16, 2009 at 7:13 am

Richmond still stuck in the past… Another day, another dollar!

Flag Comment Posted by CommonSense on April 16, 2009 at 7:02 am

Surprise - surprise - once again the Commission wants to let this area of Richmond rot into nothingness.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Videos
Weekend
 

Advertisement